The heirs of Colombian screenwriter Fernando Gaitán, Ana María and Luisa Gaitán, have initiated legal action against RCN Televisión, claiming the network failed to secure proper patrimonial rights for the exploitation of their late father’s work. Filed in March 2025, the lawsuit specifically challenges the transition of classic telenovelas—including Yo soy Betty, la fea—from broadcast television to streaming platforms, asserting that these digital rights were never formally ceded by the author.
The Core Legal Dispute: Streaming vs. Broadcast Rights
The central conflict rests on the interpretation of original contracts signed during Fernando Gaitán’s 30-year tenure at RCN. According to Luisa Gaitán, the existing agreements authorized the network to broadcast the works on television, but failed to grant explicit permission for digital distribution. Carolina Polanco García, an attorney representing the heirs, stated that the legal claim focuses on the infringement of patrimonial rights, noting that the network lacked the necessary authorization to host these productions on streaming services.
Pro Tip: In modern copyright law, “patrimonial rights” refer to the economic benefits derived from a work. When legacy contracts are silent on new technologies like streaming, creators or their heirs may hold a strong position to renegotiate or reclaim control over those specific distribution channels.
Impacted Productions and Creative Legacy
The litigation encompasses several of the most significant works in Latin American television history. Beyond the global success of Yo soy Betty, la fea, the lawsuit includes claims regarding:
- Café con aroma de mujer
- Hasta que la plata nos separe
- Todos los novios de Laura
- Que no muera el amor
- María de los Guardias
Ana María Gaitán noted that after her father’s death in 2019, the family observed unauthorized creative changes and remakes of his work. She expressed concern that the adaptations of Café con aroma de mujer and Hasta que la plata nos separe deviated from the original vision, leading the family to feel that their father’s creative legacy was being exploited rather than honored.
Future Industry Implications for Legacy Content
The case highlights a growing trend of “copyright reclamation” in the streaming era. As networks and production houses move content from linear TV to global platforms, original contracts written in the 1990s and early 2000s are increasingly coming under scrutiny. The Gaitán family’s legal stance—that their father never ceded rights for these new formats—could set a precedent for how production companies handle the digital migration of legacy catalogs.
Did you know? Disputes over “moral rights” and “patrimonial rights” often arise when the original creator is no longer alive to provide consent for modern adaptations, as seen in the Gaitán family’s opposition to certain sequels like Betty, la historia continúa.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why are Fernando Gaitán’s daughters suing RCN?
The heirs allege that RCN utilized their father’s works, particularly on streaming platforms, without obtaining the necessary transfer of patrimonial rights. They are seeking judicial recognition as the sole holders of these economic rights.
What specific rights are being claimed?
The lawsuit targets the patrimonial rights—the rights related to the economic exploitation of the works. The legal team is asking the court to declare that the heirs, not the network, hold these rights for digital and cinematographic distribution.
Which productions are involved in the lawsuit?
The claim covers Yo soy Betty, la fea, as well as Hasta que la plata nos separe, Café con aroma de mujer, Todos los novios de Laura, Que no muera el amor, and María de los Guardias.
Are you interested in the intersection of entertainment law and intellectual property? Subscribe to our newsletter for deep dives into how landmark cases are shaping the future of global media.
Related reading