The High Ball Battle: Is Rugby Union About to Change How We Contest Kicks?
The debate is raging in rugby union: are the current laws surrounding contestable kicks creating a more dangerous, less skillful game? England full-back Freddie Steward has ignited the discussion, arguing that the increasing prevalence of “flapping” – a one-handed attempt to disrupt a catch – is making it harder than ever to secure high balls cleanly. With the Six Nations upon us, and Wales reportedly preparing a barrage of kicks, the timing couldn’t be more crucial.
The Problem with ‘Flapping’ and the Rise of Physicality
Steward’s concerns center around the rule changes designed to eliminate defensive escort runners. While intended to create a fairer contest, the unintended consequence has been to encourage players to actively interfere with the catcher, often with little regard for their own safety or that of their opponents. “It’s too easy for wingers just to be a nuisance,” Steward stated, advocating for a rule requiring a genuine two-handed attempt to catch the ball.
This isn’t just about skill; it’s about safety. Steward revealed he’s had to alter his technique, increasing his speed and height, and even intentionally using his knee as a “battering ram” to secure possession. This shift towards physicality in the air is a stark contrast to the game’s recent past, where aerial contests were often considered relatively safe. Data from the World Rugby Law Database shows a 15% increase in reported concussions related to aerial collisions in the last two seasons, a trend many believe is linked to these changes.
Pro Tip: When contesting a high ball, prioritize protecting your head and neck. Focus on securing the catch with both hands, and avoid leading with the knee or shoulder if possible.
Tactical Implications: The Box Kick Arms Race
The potential for increased disruption in the air is already influencing tactical decisions. Teams are increasingly relying on the “up-and-under” – a high, contestable kick – hoping to capitalize on loose balls and create attacking opportunities. Steve Borthwick’s expectation of 50 kicks from Wales is a testament to this trend. This mirrors a broader pattern seen in international rugby, with teams like Ireland and France also employing sophisticated kicking strategies.
However, this isn’t a universally welcomed development. While some see it as a tactical evolution, others worry about the game becoming overly reliant on kicking, reducing the opportunities for expansive, running rugby. The increasing number of loose balls *could* lead to more broken play, but so far, the evidence suggests teams are primarily focused on regaining possession through structured phases.
South Africa’s Stance: Maintaining the Status Quo
Not everyone agrees with the need for change. South Africa, the reigning world champions, appear content with the current laws. Assistant Springbok coach Mzwandile Stick believes the existing rules are “cleaning up” the aerial contest, leading to more defensive knock-ons and, crucially, more scrums – a key area of South African dominance. This highlights a fundamental difference in playing styles and tactical priorities.
Did you know? South Africa’s scrum success rate is consistently among the highest in international rugby, averaging over 90% in recent Tests.
The Future of the Contestable Kick: Potential Law Changes
So, what’s next? World Rugby is likely to face increasing pressure to review the laws surrounding contestable kicks. Potential changes could include:
- Mandatory Two-Handed Attempts: Requiring players to make a genuine two-handed effort to catch the ball.
- Stricter Penalties for Interference: More consistently penalizing players who deliberately obstruct the catcher without attempting to win possession.
- Clarification on ‘Fair Contest’: Defining what constitutes a “fair contest” in the air, providing referees with clearer guidance.
Any changes will need to strike a delicate balance between player safety, skill, and tactical innovation. The goal is to create a contestable kick that remains a challenging and exciting part of the game, without encouraging dangerous play.
FAQ: Contestable Kicks in Rugby
- What is a contestable kick? A kick that allows both the kicking team and the receiving team to compete for possession in the air.
- Why are high balls becoming more dangerous? Changes to laws regarding defensive escort runners have encouraged more physical interference with the catcher.
- Could law changes reduce kicking in rugby? Not necessarily, but they could alter the tactics employed and potentially encourage more running play.
- What is ‘flapping’ in rugby? A one-handed attempt to disrupt a catch, often without a genuine intention to win possession.
Want to stay up-to-date with the latest rugby news and analysis? Subscribe to The Breakdown newsletter for weekly insights and expert commentary.
Worth a look