Garmin Forerunner 70 vs. 170 Review

by Chief Editor

Garmin’s Forerunner 70 and 170 series represent the company’s current strategy of segmenting entry-level running watches by feature sets rather than core performance. While the base Forerunner 70 provides essential GPS tracking for 2,899 SEK, the 170 and 170 Music models add contactless payments, barometric altimeters, and onboard storage for premiums of 550 to 1,150 SEK, according to the manufacturer’s product specifications.

Why do entry-level running watches differ in price?

Manufacturers differentiate entry-level models by gating specific lifestyle features behind higher price points. According to Garmin’s product data, the primary distinction between the Forerunner 70 and the 170 is the inclusion of a barometer, gyroscope, and compass in the latter. These sensors enable the 170 to track elevation gain and stair climbing, metrics absent from the base 70 model. Market analysis suggests that while these hardware additions cost relatively little to manufacture, they serve as the primary leverage for moving consumers toward mid-range pricing tiers.

Pro tip: If you train primarily on flat terrain, the missing barometric altimeter in the Forerunner 70 is unlikely to impact your performance data, potentially saving you over 500 SEK.

How does sensor integration change the training experience?

The inclusion of sensors like the gyroscope and altimeter shifts the utility of a watch from simple distance tracking to comprehensive environmental analysis. As noted in product testing, the Forerunner 170’s ability to measure vertical movement provides a more accurate picture of trail running or hilly road courses. Conversely, the Forerunner 70 relies on GPS data for distance, which remains sufficient for standard road running but lacks the sophisticated elevation logging found in the 170. Both models utilize a hybrid interface, allowing users to toggle between physical buttons and OLED touchscreen navigation.

How does sensor integration change the training experience?

What is the future of wearable payment and storage?

The integration of NFC-based contactless payments and offline music storage is becoming a baseline expectation for consumer fitness wearables. Data from current product lineups indicates that “Music” variants—like the Forerunner 170 Music—are designed to decouple the watch from the smartphone entirely. By allowing users to pair Bluetooth headphones directly to the watch, Garmin removes the need for a secondary device during exercise. Industry trends suggest that as memory storage costs continue to drop, these features will likely migrate further down the product chain, eventually becoming standard in even the most affordable fitness trackers.

Did you know?

Garmin’s “Body Battery” feature, present in these models, uses heart rate variability (HRV) and activity data to estimate your energy reserves. It acts as a guide to determine whether you should push for a high-intensity workout or prioritize recovery.

Garmin Forerunner 70 & 170 Review // Best Garmins on a Budget!

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use the Forerunner 70 for swimming or cycling?

Yes, both models support these activities, but the Forerunner 170 offers more advanced metrics for these sports compared to the base 70 model, according to technical specifications provided by Garmin.

Do these watches require a phone to track a run?

No. Both the Forerunner 70 and 170 feature built-in GPS, allowing you to log pace, distance, and route without carrying a smartphone.

Can I answer calls on these watches?

No. None of these models include a microphone or speaker for phone calls. While Android users can respond to notifications with pre-set messages, the hardware does not support voice communication.


Are you considering an upgrade to your current training gear? Share your experiences with Garmin’s ecosystem in the comments below or subscribe to our weekly newsletter for more in-depth product reviews.

You may also like

Leave a Comment