Former German Defense Minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, 54, has publicly stated that a military attack by US President Donald Trump, 79, on Greenland is a possible scenario. “With this man, nothing can be ruled out,” Guttenberg said Tuesday evening on the program “Maischberger.” He warned that Europe must now stand up to the US President and “find the right language,” though he expressed skepticism about Europe’s ability to do so.
European Strategy Questioned
Guttenberg questioned whether Europe has a coordinated strategy to counter Trump’s actions. He described the approach of NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, 58, as a “slime trail,” suggesting Rutte is overly cautious. He also criticized French President Emmanuel Macron, 48, for threatening a “trade bazooka” against the US, arguing that such displays require follow-through or risk provoking a retaliatory response from Trump, “like a bully will react.”
European leaders are scheduled to meet with the US President at the World Economic Forum in Davos today, with Trump expected to deliver a highly anticipated speech this afternoon. It remains to be seen whether European leaders will directly confront Trump outside of his prepared remarks or seek a compromise.
“The Next Fist to the Face”
Guttenberg warned that vigilance is crucial, stating, “The moment you breathe a sigh of relief with Donald Trump, you get the next fist in the face.” He dismissed Trump’s rationale for potentially taking Greenland – to secure it – as a “complete farce,” noting the US already has existing means to do so without annexation. Guttenberg attributed Trump’s interest in Greenland to two primary motivations: the US President’s “incredibly narcissistic ego” and economic interests.
Guttenberg summarized Trump’s behavior as akin to “a third-grader having his Frisbee taken away.” US political advisor Andrew Langer, also appearing on “Maischberger,” disagreed with the invasion scenario, recommending it be “categorically excluded” and characterizing European concerns as exaggerated.
Frequently Asked Questions
Could the US realistically invade Greenland?
According to Guttenberg, the US already has the means to secure its interests in Greenland without annexation, suggesting a full-scale invasion is not a necessity.
What is Guttenberg’s assessment of European unity in responding to Trump?
Guttenberg expressed doubt that Europe has a coordinated strategy to counter Trump’s actions, criticizing both the cautious approach of NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte and the confrontational stance of French President Emmanuel Macron.
What motivations does Guttenberg attribute to Trump’s interest in Greenland?
Guttenberg believes Trump’s motivations are driven by his “incredibly narcissistic ego” and economic interests.
Given these warnings about potential instability and differing approaches to engagement, how might a more unified European response alter the current trajectory of transatlantic relations?
