Surabaya Song Modification Controversy Sparks Legal and Cultural Debate
DJ Icha Chellow and singer Mala Agatha face police reports over a modified version of Anisa Bahar’s song “Gapapa,” which they allegedly altered to include pornographic lyrics.
Legal Framework and Charges
The case centers on alleged violations of Indonesia’s UU ITE (Information and Electronic Transactions Law) and UU Pornografi (Pornography Law). According to Baihaqi Akbar, head of Aliansi Madura Indonesia (AMI), the modified lyrics contain “vulgar language” deemed inappropriate for minors. AMI filed a report with Polrestabes Surabaya on July 8, 2026, citing concerns about the song’s “dangerous influence on children.”
Yakuza Maneges, another group, submitted a separate report to Polresta Malang Kota on July 13, 2026. Their legal team, led by M Zakki, cited Article 34 juncto Article 8 and Article 36 juncto Article 10 of the Pornography Law. They also referenced provisions in the Criminal Code (KUHP Pidana), including Article 407 and 406 huruf A.
Cultural Context and Public Reaction
AMI emphasized the “risk of exposing minors to inappropriate content.”
Industry Implications and Precedents
Did You Know?
Indonesia’s UU ITE criminalizes “offensive” online content.
Pro Tips for Artists and Creators
FAQ: Understanding the Surabaya Song Controversy
What is the “Gapapa” song modification about?
The original song by Anisa Bahar was altered by Icha Chellow and Mala Agatha to include lyrics alleged to contain pornographic content. The modified version was uploaded online, prompting complaints from advocacy groups.
What legal penalties could the artists face?
Stay Informed: Explore Related Stories
How Indonesia’s Digital Laws Impact Creative Expression
Case Studies: Music, Censorship, and Legal Challenges in Southeast Asia
Have thoughts on this story? Share your perspective in the comments below.
Worth a look
