County Court at Law Judge Rosie Speedlin-Gonzalez was arraigned in court Thursday, not to preside over a case, but as the subject of one. She faces criminal charges stemming from an alleged incident that occurred in December of 2024.
Charges Filed Against Judge
Speedlin-Gonzalez has been charged with one count of unlawful restraint by a peace officer or judge, a second-degree felony, and official oppression, a Class A misdemeanor. According to the indictment, prosecutors allege she intentionally or knowingly restrained an individual by restricting their movements without consent, substantially interfering with their liberty.
Efforts to reach the alleged victim, identified as a local attorney, for comment have been made, but a response is pending. Similarly, a request for comment sent to Speedlin-Gonzalez’s office remains unanswered.
Recusal and Special Prosecutor
The Bexar County District Attorney’s Office filed a motion for recusal from the case, leading to the appointment of Special Prosecutor Brian Cromeens of Goliad County. The District Attorney’s Office stated they are “prohibited from providing any further comment on the matter.” The motion for recusal was granted, and Cromeens is now handling the prosecution.
County officials have confirmed that Speedlin-Gonzalez is currently being paid, though her existing caseload has been redistributed to other judges. This suggests an attempt to maintain court operations while the legal proceedings unfold.
RELATED: Judge Speedlin Gonzalez pays $2400 fine for bringing loaded gun to the airport
Frequently Asked Questions
What charges is Judge Speedlin-Gonzalez facing?
She is charged with one count of unlawful restraint by a peace officer or judge, a second-degree felony, and official oppression, a Class A misdemeanor.
When did the alleged incident occur?
The indictment states the alleged incident occurred in December of 2024.
Who is now handling the prosecution of the case?
Special Prosecutor Brian Cromeens of Goliad County is now handling the case after the Bexar County District Attorney’s Office recused itself.
How will these charges impact the ongoing work of the Reflejo Court, and what steps might be taken to ensure continuity of services for those involved?
Worth a look