Financial analyst Abdullah Kurdi has revealed key operational indicators for the delivery platforms Keeta and Jahez for the year 2025. The data highlights a significant divergence in how the two companies are managing their growth and operational efficiency within the market.
Keeta’s High-Density Performance
The data shows that Keeta has achieved a substantial volume of activity despite a more concentrated geographic presence. The platform recorded approximately 150 million orders.
In terms of value, Keeta’s average order price reached 68.7 Saudi Riyals. These operations were concentrated within a geographic range of approximately 23 cities.
Jahez’s Extensive Reach and Operational Challenges
Jahez presents a different strategic model, focusing on wide-scale geographic expansion. The platform recorded a total of 111.6 million orders, with 101.4 million of those originating from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Bahrain.
The average order value for Jahez was 62.3 Saudi Riyals. This performance was spread across a vast network covering 100 cities and governorates.
Efficiency vs. Expansion
Analysis of the figures indicates that while Jahez has a significantly larger geographic footprint, this expansion has approach with a cost. The results suggest a dispersion in operational efficiency for Jahez.
Moving forward, this disparity may lead to strategic adjustments. Companies could potentially shift their focus toward optimizing efficiency in existing hubs or refining the logistics of wide-scale distribution to close the performance gap.
Frequently Asked Questions
What were the operational figures for Keeta in 2025?
Keeta recorded approximately 150 million orders with an average order value of 68.7 Saudi Riyals, operating across roughly 23 cities.
How does Jahez’s geographic reach compare to Keeta’s?
Jahez has a much broader reach, covering 100 cities and governorates, whereas Keeta’s operations are concentrated in about 23 cities.
What is the primary concern regarding Jahez’s operational model?
Despite its extensive geographic coverage of over 100 cities, the results indicate a dispersion in operational efficiency.
Do you believe a concentrated city-based strategy is more sustainable than wide-scale geographic expansion in the delivery sector?
Keep reading
