Kenya’s Activist Under Surveillance: A Growing Trend of Digital Crackdowns
Kenyan pro-democracy activist Boniface Mwangi, who plans to run for president in 2027, recently discovered his phone had been compromised after its return by Kenyan authorities following his arrest last July. The device was reportedly accessed without a password, raising serious concerns about privacy and security. A new report by Citizen Lab confirms authorities used Israeli technology to break into Mwangi’s phone while it was in police custody.
The Cellebrite Connection and Global Implications
The Citizen Lab report highlights a disturbing pattern: the abuse of Cellebrite technology by government clients. Cellebrite, an Israeli firm, provides digital forensics tools used to extract data from mobile devices. While the company maintains it has a “rigorous process” for reviewing misuse allegations and takes “decisive action” when evidence is presented, the findings suggest these measures are insufficient.
This isn’t an isolated incident. Citizen Lab previously found FlexiSPY spyware installed on the phones of Kenyan filmmakers Bryan Adagala and Nicholas Wambugu while in police custody. Similar concerns have surfaced in Jordan, where authorities appear to be using Cellebrite to target activists critical of Israel and supportive of Gaza. Reports as well indicate potential misuse in Myanmar, Botswana, Serbia and Belarus.
Beyond Kenya: A Worldwide Pattern of Surveillance
The use of surveillance technology against activists and journalists is a growing global trend. John Scott-Railton, a senior researcher at Citizen Lab, emphasizes the danger: “Your phone holds the keys to your life, and governments shouldn’t be able to help themselves to the contents just because they don’t like what you are saying.”
This trend extends beyond Cellebrite. The January report from Citizen Lab detailing the use of Cellebrite technology in Jordan follows a pattern of governments leveraging digital tools to suppress dissent. The implications are far-reaching, potentially chilling free speech and hindering democratic processes.
The Impact on Pro-Democracy Movements
Boniface Mwangi’s case underscores the risks faced by pro-democracy activists. He stated he operates under constant surveillance, with authorities already possessing information gathered from others’ phones. He believes “non-state actors” are enabling the surveillance, jeopardizing his safety.
Amnesty International noted that the legal campaign against Mwangi, including charges of unlawful possession of ammunition, appeared to be part of a broader effort to intimidate dissent. This highlights how surveillance can be used not just to gather information, but to actively suppress opposition.
What’s at Stake: Privacy, Security, and Democratic Values
The unchecked proliferation of surveillance technology poses a significant threat to fundamental rights. The ability of governments to access private communications and personal data erodes trust, stifles activism, and undermines democratic institutions.
FAQ
Q: What is Cellebrite?
A: Cellebrite is an Israeli company that develops digital forensics tools used to extract data from mobile devices.
Q: What is Citizen Lab?
A: Citizen Lab is a research laboratory that tracks digital threats against civil society.
Q: Is this surveillance legal?
A: Cellebrite states its technology is used legally, with due process or consent. However, reports suggest misuse and lack of oversight.
Q: What can be done to protect against this type of surveillance?
A: Activists and journalists can employ encryption, secure communication apps, and practice digital security hygiene. Increased regulation and oversight of surveillance technology companies are also crucial.
Did you know? Activists are increasingly using encrypted messaging apps and secure communication tools to protect their communications from surveillance.
Pro Tip: Regularly update your phone’s operating system and apps to benefit from the latest security patches.
What are your thoughts on the increasing use of surveillance technology? Share your opinions in the comments below and explore our other articles on digital rights and privacy.
