LA County wildfires: 1 year later, some residents whose homes survived Eaton and Palisades fires fear living in them

by Rachel Morgan News Editor

ALTADENA, Calif. — A year after the most destructive wildfires in Los Angeles area history, residents are confronting a second wave of trauma: the lingering threat of toxic contamination in their homes. Signs warning of “DANGER: Lead Work Area” are becoming a common sight, a stark reminder of the hidden hazards remaining after the blazes that ignited on January 7, 2025.

People Forced Back Into Their Altadena Homes

The fires, which destroyed nearly 17,000 structures and claimed at least 31 lives, left behind a legacy of ash containing a dangerous cocktail of pollutants. For homeowners like Nina and Billy Malone, returning home has meant living with the fear of unseen toxins. Despite professional cleaning, lead remains present on the floors of their Altadena home, forcing them to return in August after their rental assistance was cut off. Nina Malone now experiences daily headaches and a sore throat, while Billy requires an inhaler for worsening respiratory issues.

Did You Know? More than 70% of homes within the Eaton Fire area were built before 1979, when lead paint was still commonly used, increasing the risk of lead contamination after the fires.

Data Shows Dangerous Lead Levels Still in Homes

A November report by the Eaton Fire Residents United, a volunteer group, revealed the extent of the problem. Based on data from 50 homeowners, the report found that six out of 10 homes damaged by the Eaton Fire contain dangerous levels of cancer-causing asbestos, brain-damaging lead, or both. Lead levels were, on average, almost 60 times higher than EPA standards.

The ash left behind isn’t simply soot; it’s a toxic mixture of incinerated materials – cars, electronics, furniture – containing pesticides, plastics, and heavy metals. Even after the fires were extinguished, volatile organic compounds, some known carcinogens, continued to linger indoors.

‘We Have to Live in the Scar’

Residents are facing a difficult battle with insurance companies, who often resist covering the full cost of thorough cleanup and testing. Julie Lawson, an Altadena resident, has already spent $7,000 on soil testing and anticipates further expenses for remediation. The situation is compounded by the fact that rebuilding will take years, leaving many living in a prolonged state of uncertainty.

Expert Insight: The challenges faced by residents highlight a critical gap in disaster response: the often-overlooked long-term health consequences of urban wildfires and the complexities of navigating insurance claims for environmental contamination. This situation underscores the need for more comprehensive testing protocols and greater accountability from insurance providers.

Annie Barbour, with the nonprofit United Policyholders, notes the significant mental health toll this ongoing crisis is taking on residents. Many initially felt relief that their homes survived, only to find themselves facing a new, invisible threat.

Frequently Asked Questions

What contaminants are homeowners concerned about finding in their homes?

Homeowners are concerned about finding asbestos, lead, and volatile organic compounds in their homes, all of which were released during the fires and can pose significant health risks.

What did the Eaton Fire Residents United report find regarding lead levels?

The report found that 63% of the 50 homes tested had lead levels above the Environmental Protection Agency’s standard, with average levels almost 60 times higher than the EPA’s rule.

What are residents doing to mitigate the risks of contamination?

Residents are ventilating their homes, using HEPA filters with charcoal filters, and, in some cases, paying out-of-pocket for additional testing and remediation.

As residents like the Malones painstakingly sort through their belongings, fearing contamination, the long road to recovery continues. The fires may have been extinguished, but for many, the battle for a safe and healthy home is far from over.

What steps do you think communities can take to better prepare for the long-term health consequences of wildfires?

You may also like

Leave a Comment