Following the shootings of U.S. citizens Renee Good and Alex Pretti by federal agents in Minneapolis, a debate has emerged among police chiefs regarding the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement policies. While some leaders have publicly criticized the administration, Los Angeles Police Department Chief Jim McDonnell has maintained a more reserved stance.
A Delicate Balance
This week, Chief McDonnell reaffirmed the LAPD’s close working relationship with federal law enforcement. He stated he would not direct his officers to enforce a new state law prohibiting face coverings by federal agents – a law currently facing a constitutional challenge. This position reflects a broader trend among top police officials who often prioritize collaboration with federal partners, a relationship vital for investigations into gangs, extremist groups, and other serious crimes, as well as securing federal funding.
McDonnell and the LAPD are navigating a particularly sensitive situation. Los Angeles has experienced immigration raids and protests, with local leaders, including Mayor Karen Bass, voicing criticism of the White House. With the upcoming World Cup and Olympics requiring federal coordination, the chief appears to be carefully weighing his public statements.
A Policy of Non-Intervention
Over the past year, McDonnell has consistently emphasized the LAPD’s long-standing policy of not engaging in civil immigration enforcement. He has largely refrained from commenting on the tactics employed by federal agents, focusing instead on addressing vandalism and violence associated with protests. He described the LAPD’s relationship with federal partners as “best in the nation.”
Recently, McDonnell appeared alongside FBI Director Kash Patel to announce the capture of a Canadian former Olympic snowboarder accused of cocaine trafficking. At a press conference highlighting historically low homicide rates, he acknowledged being “disturbed” by events elsewhere, alluding to the shooting of Alex Pretti without naming him. He reiterated the department’s commitment to continued collaboration with federal agencies on matters outside of immigration.
McDonnell explained his decision not to enforce the mask ban, stating he would not risk escalating conflict with “another armed agency” over a misdemeanor offense. He characterized the law as “not a good policy decision and it wasn’t well thought out.”
A National Trend
McDonnell’s cautious approach contrasts with the responses of other police chiefs. In Minneapolis, Chief Brian O’Hara reportedly warned officers they could lose their jobs for intervening if federal agents used excessive force. Philadelphia Sheriff Rochelle Bilal publicly criticized ICE agents, while other cities have re-evaluated collaborative efforts with federal agencies. The International Association of Chiefs of Police has called for a meeting between local, state, and federal partners to discuss a path forward.
Supporters of McDonnell argue that the chief’s role is apolitical, and that speaking out could jeopardize federal funding, including resources for de-escalation training. Assemblyman Mark González, while previously critical of McDonnell’s collaboration with ICE, now considers him a “great partner,” but expressed disappointment in his reluctance to condemn federal actions in other cities.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the LAPD’s official policy regarding civil immigration enforcement?
The LAPD has a long-standing policy of not getting involved in civil immigration enforcement, according to Chief McDonnell.
Why is Chief McDonnell choosing to maintain a close relationship with federal law enforcement?
Chief McDonnell believes a strong working relationship with federal partners is “critical” for Los Angeles, given the city’s size and its status as a potential target for terrorism. He also points to the need for collaboration on investigations into gangs, extremist groups, and other major crimes.
What is the status of the new state law regarding face coverings for federal agents?
The new state law prohibiting face coverings by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal agents is currently being challenged as unconstitutional.
As other cities grapple with the implications of federal immigration enforcement, will Chief McDonnell’s approach of quiet diplomacy prove effective in balancing local concerns with the need for federal cooperation?
Worth a look