Former Russian President Dmitri Medvedev has suggested the possibility of retaliatory “kidnapping” operations against foreign leaders, mirroring what he characterized as actions taken by the USA in Venezuela. Specifically, Medvedev mentioned German Chancellor Friedrich Merz as a potential target, labeling him a “Nazi” and stating his capture “could be an excellent turn in this carnival series.” He further suggested there were grounds to pursue Merz within Germany, adding that citizens would not suffer a loss as a result.
Medvedev, currently the Vice Chairman of Russia’s National Security Council, served as President from 2008-2012. In recent years, he has become known for increasingly strong rhetoric against the West, frequently attacking Ukraine and Western nations.
Threats Directed at Zelenskyy
Medvedev also questioned the legitimacy of Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro, stating that claims of his illegitimacy would not withstand scrutiny. He criticized what he described as a “double standard” in European reactions to the situation.
Turning to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Medvedev stated that, from his perspective, it would “certainly be better not to relax” given that Zelenskyy’s term had ostensibly expired. However, he acknowledged that Zelenskyy remains in office due to the constitution during wartime.
The comments come after reports detailing what has been described as a US operation involving the military apprehension of Nicolás Maduro.
Frequently Asked Questions
What action did Medvedev suggest could be taken against Friedrich Merz?
Medvedev suggested the possibility of a “kidnapping” operation against German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, framing it as a potential response to actions taken by the USA in Venezuela.
What is Medvedev’s current role in the Russian government?
Medvedev currently serves as the Vice Chairman of Russia’s National Security Council.
What did Medvedev say about Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s presidency?
Medvedev stated that, in his view, it would “certainly be better not to relax” as Zelenskyy’s presidential term had, according to him, expired, though he acknowledged Zelenskyy remains in office due to wartime provisions.
Given the increasingly volatile rhetoric, what impact might these statements have on international relations and diplomatic efforts?
Related reading