Missouri Could Join Push for Constitutional Amendment to Limit Big Money in Politics

by Chief Editor

The Rising Tide Against Big Money in Politics: Could Missouri Be a Turning Point?

For decades, the influence of large financial contributions has been a persistent challenge in American politics. Now, a bipartisan movement is gaining momentum to reclaim control of elections from wealthy donors and corporations, and Missouri could soon be at the forefront of this effort.

Recent Missouri elections, like the 2024 amendment legalizing sports betting, saw record-breaking spending from out-of-state corporations. (Vaughn Wheat/The Beacon)

The Limits of Current Regulations

Since 1976, federal courts have consistently struck down attempts to restrict campaign spending, including limitations on foreign and corporate contributions. This has led to situations where the voices of ordinary citizens are drowned out by massive financial infusions. In Jackson County, Missouri, in 2024, the campaigns for and against a sales tax subsidy for sports stadiums demonstrated this imbalance starkly: the Royals and Chiefs spent $3 million, over 250 times the $11,511 raised by opponents. The 2024 Missouri sports betting amendment broke state records with $46 million in spending, largely from DraftKings and FanDuel.

American Promise and the Push for a Constitutional Amendment

The advocacy group American Promise believes the only viable solution is a constitutional amendment to overturn Supreme Court rulings like Buckley v. Valeo (1976) and Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010). They are actively recruiting states to pass resolutions calling for such an amendment. Missouri is poised to become the 24th state to join this bipartisan coalition, with resolutions HCR 23 and SCR 11 currently under consideration by the General Assembly.

American Promise argues that the current system effectively delegates campaign finance policy to unelected federal judges, a situation they aim to “deconstitutionalize.”

The Path to Ratification: A Steep Climb

Amending the U.S. Constitution is a rigorous process. Any proposed amendment must pass both houses of Congress with a two-thirds majority and then be ratified by 38 states. Currently, 23 states have already passed resolutions supporting a constitutional amendment. If Missouri and the 12 other states considering resolutions this year succeed, the total could reach 37 – just one state short of the required 38 for ratification.

A recent poll indicates significant public support for reform: 63% of Americans disagree with the Citizens United decision, and three out of four believe big money in politics erodes faith in democracy.

Federalism and State Control

Supporters of the resolutions, like Missouri State Senator Curtis Trent and Representative Chad Perkins, emphasize the principle of federalism, arguing that states should have the power to regulate their own election laws. They believe returning control to the states would allow for more tailored solutions to address specific challenges.

Though, some Democrats express caution, seeking clarity on what specific regulations would be pursued. Concerns have been raised about the potential for arguments regarding foreign money in elections to be used to challenge legitimate ballot measures, referencing allegations surrounding the 2024 Missouri abortion amendment.

Looking Ahead: A Potential Shift in Power

The movement for campaign finance reform is gaining traction, fueled by widespread public dissatisfaction with the current system. If Missouri joins the bipartisan coalition, it will bring the nation closer to a potential constitutional amendment that could reshape the landscape of American elections. The ultimate goal, according to American Promise, is to empower constituents and restore a more level playing field in the political arena.



Frequently Asked Questions

What is Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission?

This 2010 Supreme Court decision ruled that corporations and unions have the same First Amendment rights as individuals, allowing them to spend unlimited amounts of money on political advertising.

What is Buckley v. Valeo?

A 1976 Supreme Court decision that established that limiting campaign spending violates the First Amendment.

What is American Promise?

An advocacy group focused on campaign finance reform, working to pass a constitutional amendment to overturn current Supreme Court rulings.

How many states need to ratify an amendment for it to become law?

38 states must ratify an amendment after it has been passed by a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress.

Want to learn more? Explore the resources available at American Promise and stay informed about the latest developments in campaign finance reform.

You may also like

Leave a Comment