MONTREAL — The Montreal police hate-crimes unit has launched an investigation following a weekend protest where demonstrators hanged three figures in effigy. The display, which took place during a rally organized by the group Montreal4Palestine, has ignited a sharp debate over the boundaries of free speech and political expression in the city.
Footage shared on the activist group’s Instagram page depicted effigies representing U.S. President Donald Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir. The display prompted immediate condemnation from local officials and advocacy groups, who labeled the act as intimidation and antisemitic.
Mayor Soraya Martinez Ferrada addressed the incident on social media, stating that the use of hanging imagery and hate symbols has no place in Montreal. “The incitement of violence, hate symbols and intimidation that we see in our streets are unacceptable,” she wrote.
Leslie Roberts, the Ensemble Montréal councillor for Peter-McGill, confirmed he contacted the local police commander after witnessing the rally while in his district. Roberts emphasized that his concerns were not tied to the specific identities of the figures, but to the nature of the protest. “In my view, depiction of violence against anyone crosses the line,” Roberts said, noting specifically that one effigy appeared to feature a Jewish kippah. Anthony Housefather, Member of Parliament for Mount Royal, echoed these concerns, calling the act “disgusting” and “clear incitement to hatred.”
Montreal4Palestine has rejected these characterizations. In a statement, the group maintained that the effigies were intended solely to represent the named political figures and were not meant to target Jewish people or the Jewish faith. The group further defended its actions as protected political expression, condemning what it described as “defamatory accusations and deliberate distortion of events.”
The incident follows a similar controversy earlier this month, when protesters at a May Day rally used a makeshift guillotine to decapitate an effigy resembling Quebec Labour Minister Jean Boulet. While that group described their actions as a “carnivalesque performance,” it also drew condemnation from politicians and prompted a police investigation.
The current investigation highlights a complex legal landscape regarding public protest. Pearl Eliadis, a lawyer and associate professor at McGill’s Max Bell School of Public Policy, noted that the Canadian and Quebec Charters of Rights and Freedoms provide robust protection for political speech, creating a high legal threshold for authorities seeking to pursue charges.
“The courts have said over and over again that political speech is, in a sense, the highest form of free speech,” Eliadis explained. She noted that while depictions of violence are generally considered protected, prosecutors would need to prove that the conduct necessitates reasonable limits on free expression.
As the investigation continues, authorities may face the challenge of determining whether the protest crossed the line from protected political dissent into criminal incitement. While police have confirmed the hate-crimes unit is involved, they have provided no further details on the scope or potential outcomes of the probe. Future developments could depend on whether investigators find sufficient evidence to meet the high legal bar required to limit expression protected by the Charters.
Keep reading