Mars remains humanity’s most likely second home in conceptual roadmaps, but a NASA-funded study warns the planet cannot be terraformed with present-day technology. Meanwhile, past commercial attempts like Mars One have collapsed into bankruptcy, highlighting the stark gap between billionaire ambitions and the grim realities of off-world survival.
The idea of a human colony on the Red Planet has long occupied a comfortable space between speculative fiction and corporate slide decks. Yet when stripped of its optimistic marketing, living on Mars presents an extraordinarily hostile environment that current engineering cannot easily alter.
The Harsh Environmental Realities of the Martian Surface
According to NASA’s summary of the planet, Mars features an atmosphere composed of about 95 per cent carbon dioxide. Surface pressure averages less than one per cent of Earth’s sea-level pressure, creating conditions close enough to a vacuum that unshielded water boils at human body temperature.
An unprotected human on Mars would not simply suffocate slowly; a pressurized suit would be required immediately to prevent blood and tissues from turning to vapor.
- Temperatures hover around an average of minus 60 degrees Celsius.
- Surface gravity sits at roughly 38 per cent of Earth’s pull.
- Radiation levels are severe, with NASA’s Curiosity rover measuring a surface dose of approximately 0.7 millisieverts daily—many times higher than typical terrestrial exposure, driven by a lack of a global magnetic field and thin air.
- Soil across the planet is laced with perchlorates, toxic chemicals that would require intensive scrubbing before anything could be grown.
While water exists on the planet, it is locked away as ice at the poles and underground.
Why Terraforming Mars Remains Out of Reach
The ultimate fix often proposed by science fiction writers and tech visionaries is terraforming: thickening the atmosphere to trap heat, warm the planet, and allow liquid water to flow freely. However, a rigorous scientific evaluation published in 2018 poured cold water on that concept.
Researchers Bruce Jakosky and Christopher Edwards published a study in Nature Astronomy analyzing two decades of spacecraft data to tally every source of carbon dioxide remaining on Mars, including polar ice, mineral deposits, and soil. Their conclusion was definitive: even if every accessible source of the gas were released, it would raise atmospheric pressure to only about seven per cent of Earth’s.
That increase falls drastically short of what is needed to warm the planet meaningfully, and much of that carbon dioxide remains trapped in forms that human technology cannot readily mobilize. As those researchers established, terraforming Mars is not possible with present-day technology.
Lessons From the Collapse of Mars One
Long before current space agencies laid out roadmaps for crewed missions, private ventures attempted to fast-track human settlement through unconventional funding models. In 2012, a Dutch not-for-profit initiative called Mars One announced plans to send four astronauts on a one-way trip to the Red Planet, with follow-up flights every few years to build a self-sustaining colony.
Despite opening applications to anyone worldwide without requiring prior aerospace experience, the project’s financial structure dissolved under scrutiny. Nearly 3,000 formal applicants were whittled down to 100 finalists before the lack of broadcast deals and viable revenue streams caught up with the organization. Mars One filed for bankruptcy in 2019.
What Long-Term Survival on Mars Would Actually Involve
With terraforming off the table for the foreseeable future, establishing a human presence requires entirely enclosed, pressurized habitats. Engineers suggest these outposts would likely need to be buried beneath Martian soil or constructed underground to provide adequate shielding against cosmic radiation.

Certain foundational technologies are slowly taking shape. NASA’s Perseverance rover has successfully demonstrated the extraction of breathable oxygen from the thin carbon dioxide atmosphere on a small scale, while subsurface ice deposits could theoretically be mined for drinking water and rocket propellant.
Yet enormous biological unknowns remain unaddressed. While decades of research exist regarding human physiology in normal gravity and near-weightlessness, science has virtually no data on how the human body adapts to generations or multi-year stays under 38 per cent gravity, nor how chronic radiation exposure and toxic perchlorate dust would impact long-term health.
Related reading