New York City Council Speaker Julie Menin and Majority Leader Shaun Abreu are pushing back against proposals for citywide free buses, choosing instead to champion an expansion of the half-priced Fair Fares program as the most practical way to tackle transit affordability. Speaking at City & State’s Transportation in New York Summit on Friday, Abreu pointed to the steep price tag of a fare-free transit model during a fireside chat about city affordability. “When you’re thinking about a free bus program, we’re talking about anywhere from $900 million to $1.3 billion,” said Abreu, who also chairs the council’s transportation committee. “That’s not something I think we have the capacity to be doing.”
City Leaders Push Fair Fares Over Free Buses
The debate highlights a distinct policy split between city council leadership and Mayor Zohran Mamdani. While Mamdani campaigned on providing free buses for everyone regardless of income level, that pitch did not take priority during the recent state legislative session as the mayor turned his focus to securing state funding for universal childcare. Menin and Abreu remain unconvinced by the free-bus proposal, arguing that Fair Fares delivers targeted relief where it is needed most. “We must focus on what we can control at the city level,” Abreu noted regarding municipal budgetary limits.
Did You Know? The Fair Fares program provides transit relief to low-income residents, and a recent expansion pushed the eligibility threshold to 200% of the federal poverty level, making roughly 1.3 million New Yorkers eligible for the half-priced transit benefit.
Earlier this year, Menin successfully fought to get expanded eligibility for Fair Fares included in the final budget for Fiscal Year 2027. The adjustment raised the qualifying threshold from at or below 150% of the federal poverty level to at or below 200%, opening the program to an additional 340,000 residents. Unlike a single-mode free bus initiative, Menin emphasized that the half-priced program covers multiple transit options. “We felt it was really important to get to those New Yorkers that need it the most with this large expansion of Fair Fares, so that they can take the subway, bus or paratransit,” Menin said.
City leaders weigh raising eligibility limits
City leaders are already eyeing further adjustments to the initiative for future legislative sessions. “If anything, maybe next year we focus on 250% … below the federal poverty line,” Abreu said of potentially broadening access even further. However, significant logistical hurdles remain in getting eligible residents signed up for the benefit. An estimate published in June by the Independent Budget Office revealed that only 41% of eligible New Yorkers are currently enrolled in the program.
Menin and Abreu attribute the low uptake to a combination of public unawareness and a burdensome application process. “We need to continue to do more outreach so that New Yorkers are aware,” Menin said, pointing out that the paperwork itself deters participation. “It’s like a 13-page application. It’s not very user-friendly. That creates barriers to entry, and that’s very problematic.”
Compare Fair Fares with the free bus proposal
What is the difference between Fair Fares and the proposed free bus program?
Fair Fares is a half-priced transit program targeted at low-income New Yorkers that covers subways, buses, and paratransit, whereas the free bus proposal championed during the mayoral campaign aimed to provide free bus rides for everyone regardless of income level.
Who is currently eligible for the Fair Fares program?
New Yorkers living at or below 200% of the federal poverty level qualify for the program, following an expansion secured for the Fiscal Year 2027 budget that brought total eligibility to roughly 1.3 million residents.
Why are eligible residents failing to use the transit discount?
City council leaders attribute the low 41% enrollment rate to a lack of public awareness and a complicated, user-unfriendly application process that functions as a barrier to entry.
Related reading