Only the US Opposes the New World Map

According to reports from the United Nations and outlet akcent.bg, the UN General Assembly voted 164 to 1 on September 7, 2026, to adopt the Equal Earth map projection, moving away from Gerardus Mercator’s 1569 design to correct centuries of geographic distortion that disproportionately minimized continents like Africa. The resolution, titled “Let’s Fix the Map,” was spearheaded by member states of the African Union alongside the Bahamas.

The 500-Year Mercator Distortion Debate

For nearly five centuries, standard global navigation relied heavily on the Mercator projection. While effective for maintaining constant compass bearings relative to the equator, the design severely distorts landmass sizes based on distance from the equator. According to official UN discussions cited by akcent.bg, this distortion makes regions far from the equator appear vastly larger than their true surface areas.

For instance, Greenland appears roughly the size of the entire continent of Africa on traditional maps. In reality, according to verified geographic data reported by both sources, Greenland is approximately 14 times smaller than Africa and 8 times smaller than South America, roughly matching the size of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Similarly, Asia appears 3.5 times larger than Africa on standard maps, whereas the actual difference is only 1.5 times.

UN General Assembly Vote Breakdown

The resolution passed with 164 votes in favor at UN headquarters in New York. Togo led the campaign on behalf of the African Union, arguing that the traditional map format created lasting cognitive and socio-economic biases against the continent. Togolese Minister of Foreign Affairs Robert Dussey stated before the vote, as recorded in the source material, that the debate is fundamentally scientific rather than political.

Only one country opposed the measure. According to the UN record, the United States voted against the resolution, with its representative dismissing the initiative as unnecessary. Meanwhile, six nations abstained from the vote: Georgia, Estonia, Lithuania, Moldova, Serbia, and Ukraine.

Did you know? A petition on Change.org in support of the #CorrectTheMap campaign gathered nearly 13,000 signatures, highlighting that Africa is vast enough to comfortably hold the United States, China, India, Japan, Mexico, and a large portion of Europe combined, with space to spare.

Practical Impacts on Education and Technology

Because UN resolutions are non-binding, governments, schools, and tech companies are not legally forced to abandon the Mercator projection entirely. However, institutional adoption of the Equal Earth design—created in 2018—is expected to gradually reshape school curricula, digital mapping tools, and global governance frameworks over time.

500 години в заблуда: Само САЩ са против новата карта на света
Photo: akcent.bg

Historians and activists supporting the shift have frequently criticized the legacy of Mercator’s map, with some utilizing terms like “cartographic colonialism” to describe how western regions were visually centered and magnified in the global collective imagination. With the new UN backing, educational publishers face renewed pressure to modernize how young students visualize world geography.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the UN adopt a new world map?

According to UN reports, the General Assembly adopted the Equal Earth-based resolution to correct centuries of geographic distortion that symbolically minimized the true sizes of Africa and other equatorial regions.

Which country voted against the UN map resolution?

The United States was the sole nation to vote against the resolution, with its representative calling the measure unnecessary.

Does this UN resolution ban the old Mercator map?

No. UN resolutions are non-binding, meaning institutions and governments are not legally required to stop using the Mercator projection, though educational and tech changes are anticipated.

Join the Conversation

How will adopting a more accurate global map change the way future generations view international geography? Share your thoughts in the comments below, and subscribe to our newsletter for more updates on global policy shifts.

Leave a Comment