A couple was fined for failing to hold a valid transport ticket while riding the coastal tram near Ostende on May 11. Ronny and his wife, who suffers from COPD, were boarded with their border collies when they were approached by ticket inspectors. Despite the passenger’s attempt to pay for the journey shortly after boarding, the transit authority, De Lijn, upheld the fine, citing a strict, non-discriminatory enforcement policy.
The incident on the coastal tram
The conflict began shortly after the couple boarded the tram in Raversijde. According to Ronny, his primary focus was his wife’s health, as her chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) made traveling difficult during the inclement weather. He stated that he attempted to secure a seat for her before immediately seeking information on how to purchase a ticket.
Ronny reported that he was in the process of inquiring about payment procedures with another passenger when two inspectors intervened. Although a fellow traveler reportedly confirmed that the couple was in the process of arranging payment, the inspectors declared the couple in violation of transit rules. The encounter resulted in a verbal citation, which the couple contested.
The incident occurred on May 11 while the couple was traveling with their border collies on the coastal tram near Raversijde, seeking shelter from poor weather conditions.
De Lijn’s enforcement policy
Following the incident, the public transport operator, De Lijn, reviewed the case and maintained the validity of the fine. A spokesperson for the company stated that inspectors apply regulations systematically to all passengers. The company emphasized that its policy does not differentiate based on a passenger’s personal circumstances, health status, or background.
The situation highlights the friction that can occur when rigid, automated-style enforcement policies meet the unpredictable needs of passengers with health conditions. While public transit authorities prioritize consistent rule application to maintain operational standards, such cases often create significant public debate regarding the necessity of flexibility in enforcement.
What happens next
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was the couple fined?
The couple was fined because they did not have a valid ticket at the moment the inspectors requested one, despite their attempt to purchase one shortly after boarding.
What is the position of De Lijn regarding the fine?
De Lijn maintains that its inspectors apply rules to all passengers without exception, citing a policy where all infractions are sanctioned systematically regardless of personal health or individual circumstances.
Did the couple intend to travel without a ticket?
No, the couple stated they had no intention of traveling without a ticket and noted that they had successfully purchased tickets upon their arrival in Ostende.
How should public transit authorities balance strict rule enforcement with the needs of passengers facing health-related challenges?
