Petro Accuses US of Bombing Venezuela Factory & Warns of Escalation

by Chief Editor

Colombian President Gustavo Petro has publicly stated that the United States government bombed a factory in Maracaibo, Venezuela, alleging it was used for cocaine processing. The assertion, made via a post on X (formerly Twitter), carries implications for regional stability and has prompted a strong defense of Petro’s own position.

Allegations and Regional Concerns

According to Petro, “We know that Trump bombed a factory in Maracaibo, we fear that they mix the coca paste there to make cocaine and take advantage of the location in the Maracaibo Sea.” He further stated his concern over potential military escalation in the region. Petro also refuted claims linking him to Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, asserting that former President Trump had been misinformed and influenced by individuals he described as “greedy far-right extremists.”

Did You Know? In late November 2025, Petro stated the problem with Maduro is a lack of democracy, but distanced him from involvement in drug trafficking.

Petro indicated he plans to share details regarding his relationship with the Chavista movement, expressing both connection and frustration with its evolution following the death of Hugo Chávez.

Disputes Over Drug Trafficking and Accusations

The Colombian President was emphatic that there is no evidence within Colombia linking Maduro directly to drug trafficking. He stated, “I do not know if Maduro has illegitimately taken wealth from Venezuela, in our country there is no proof of drug trafficking on his part.” Petro claimed that Colombian generals previously involved in cocaine negotiations were acting in sedition against the Colombian government.

Petro also challenged the prevailing narrative surrounding anti-drug operations, stating that many vessels targeted with missiles in the Caribbean have been carrying cannabis, not cocaine, and that the victims have often been humble fishermen. He highlighted the “paradox” of cannabis legality in many US states, contrasted with its rejection by the Colombian Congress by a single vote, a decision he believes has cost lives.

Expert Insight: Accusations of external military action within a neighboring country, even when framed as anti-narcotics efforts, carry significant risk of escalating tensions and destabilizing an already complex geopolitical landscape. The assertion by President Petro introduces a new layer of complexity to US-Colombia relations and regional security dynamics.

The ELN and Shifting Drug Markets

Regarding the situation in the Catatumbo region, Petro issued an ultimatum to the ELN, demanding they choose between competing for control of the cocaine trade or pursuing peace. He stated that the area accounts for only 5% of Colombia’s total cocaine production. He also warned that the ELN’s actions are facilitating incursions into Venezuela.

Petro called for decisive action from the Colombian Army in the Catatumbo region, urging them to “take ‘filo Gringo’ and substitute crops.” He further noted a broader shift in the drug market, citing an increase in coca cultivation across Latin America and a resulting price drop for cocaine, with cannabis and illicit gold now proving more profitable.

Petro concluded by stating his last phone conversation with Maduro focused on jointly combating the ELN at the border, reaffirming his commitment to freedom and independence.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did President Petro allege regarding US actions in Venezuela?

President Petro alleged that the US government bombed a factory in Maracaibo, Venezuela, which he believes was being used for cocaine processing.

What is Petro’s stance on his relationship with Nicolás Maduro?

Petro refuted claims linking him to Maduro, stating that Trump was misinformed and that he plans to reveal details about his relationship with the Chavista movement.

What did Petro say about the types of drugs being transported on vessels targeted in the Caribbean?

Petro stated that many of the vessels attacked with missiles were carrying cannabis, not cocaine, and that the victims were often fishermen.

Given these developments, what impact might this public disagreement have on future cooperation between Colombia and the United States regarding regional security and drug interdiction efforts?

You may also like

Leave a Comment