The Criminalization of Dissent: A Global Trend?
The recent conviction of journalist Frenchie Mae Cumpio and human rights defender Marielle Domequil in the Philippines on terrorism financing charges is not an isolated incident. It’s a stark example of a worrying global trend: the increasing criminalization of dissent, where governments are leveraging security laws to silence critics and suppress activism. This case, and others like it, highlight how easily legitimate work – journalism, human rights advocacy, even providing humanitarian aid – can be misconstrued as threats to national security.
Red-Tagging and the Erosion of Due Process
A key tactic in the Philippines, and increasingly elsewhere, is “red-tagging” – publicly accusing individuals or organizations of communist or terrorist links without evidence. This practice, as documented in the case of the “Tacloban 5,” creates a climate of fear and suspicion, subjecting those targeted to surveillance, harassment, and even arbitrary arrest. The lack of due process is particularly concerning. Evidence, as seen in the Cumpio and Domequil case, often relies heavily on testimonies from questionable sources, such as ‘rebel returnees’ with potential biases, while legitimate evidence presented by the defense is dismissed.
Anti-Terrorism Laws as Tools of Repression
The Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 in the Philippines, and similar legislation around the world, contain broad and vague provisions that can be easily abused. These laws often fail to clearly define “terrorism,” allowing authorities to associate peaceful activities – like community organizing or reporting on human rights abuses – with armed groups. This creates a chilling effect on civil society, discouraging individuals from speaking out against injustice for fear of reprisal. The case of Frenchie Mae Cumpio, who was reporting on red-tagging *before* her arrest, exemplifies this danger.
The Role of Government Task Forces
The celebration of the conviction by the National Task Force to Conclude Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC) in the Philippines reveals a disturbing pattern. Government bodies designed to address security threats are instead actively participating in the persecution of activists and journalists. This demonstrates that the legal proceedings are often politically motivated, aimed at silencing dissent rather than upholding justice. The NTF-ELCAC’s systematic targeting of individuals and organizations through red-tagging creates a pretext for raids, arrests, and prosecutions.
Beyond the Philippines: A Global Pattern
While the Philippines case is particularly prominent, the criminalization of dissent is occurring in numerous countries. Reports from organizations like CIVICUS consistently document restrictions on freedom of expression, assembly, and association worldwide. Similar tactics – including the misuse of anti-terrorism laws, arbitrary detention, and smear campaigns – are used to suppress opposition in various contexts. The pattern is consistent: governments seeking to consolidate power are increasingly willing to silence those who challenge their authority.
The Fate of the Tacloban 5 and Ongoing Concerns
The situation for the remaining members of the Tacloban 5 remains precarious. While some have been released on bail, they continue to face legal challenges and harassment. Alexander Philip Abinguna remains in pretrial detention, with his trial repeatedly delayed. This prolonged detention, coupled with additional trumped-up charges, is a common tactic used to wear down activists and discourage them from continuing their work. Karapatan’s documentation reveals that approximately 700 political prisoners are currently detained in the Philippines, many facing similar circumstances.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is “red-tagging”?
- Red-tagging is the act of publicly accusing individuals or organizations of being communists or terrorists without credible evidence.
- How do anti-terrorism laws contribute to the problem?
- Broadly defined anti-terrorism laws can be misused to criminalize legitimate activities like journalism and human rights advocacy.
- What can be done to address this issue?
- Repealing or amending overly broad laws, holding perpetrators of red-tagging accountable, and strengthening due process protections are crucial steps.
Did you know? The Court of Appeals in the Philippines overturned a civil forfeiture case against Cumpio and Domequil in October 2025, finding little reason to believe they were connected to the NPA.
The case of Frenchie Mae Cumpio and Marielle Domequil serves as a warning. Protecting fundamental freedoms requires vigilance, advocacy, and a commitment to upholding the rule of law. Without these safeguards, the space for dissent will continue to shrink, and those who speak truth to power will face increasing risks.
Learn more about the Free Tacloban 5 Network and how to support their campaign.
Related reading