Thames Valley Police is assessing allegations concerning Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, including potential misconduct in public office and breaches of official secrets. This comes after the release of millions of files by the US Department of Justice that shed modern light on his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
Further Scrutiny
The police assessment follows reports that a second woman was allegedly sent to the UK by Epstein for a sexual encounter with Andrew in 2010. The encounter reportedly occurred at Royal Lodge. According to the woman’s lawyer, Brad Edwards, she alleges she was given tea and a tour of Buckingham Palace following the encounter.
Files released by the US Department of Justice also include pictures of Andrew. Sir Keir has stated that everyone is equal under the law and should be subject to it, suggesting Andrew should testify before the US Congress if he has information.
Political Response
The prime minister has indicated he would not oppose a parliamentary debate on Andrew’s links to Epstein. Thames Valley Police has confirmed it is assessing the information received in line with established procedures.
Thames Valley Police could open a formal criminal investigation, but the assessment phase must be completed first. A full investigation would likely involve gathering further evidence and interviewing witnesses. Alternatively, the police could determine that there are insufficient grounds to proceed.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Thames Valley Police currently assessing?
Thames Valley Police is assessing whether there are grounds to investigate Andrew for suspected misconduct in public office and breach of official secrets.
What allegations have been made regarding a second woman?
Thames Valley Police is assessing allegations, first reported by the BBC, that a second woman was sent to the UK by Epstein for a sexual encounter with Andrew in 2010.
What has Sir Keir said about Andrew testifying?
Sir Keir has suggested Andrew should testify before the US Congress, stating that anyone with information should come forward.
As these investigations unfold, what level of transparency do you believe is necessary to maintain public trust?
Keep reading