The Centro Democrático party announced its intent to support government initiatives that align with its core principles, despite expressing concerns over the recent election of Honorio Henríquez as Senate president. In a statement released Wednesday, July 22, the party cited potential government interference and confrontational gestures during the voting process as sources of friction, while confirming a commitment to national interests.
Election Results and Party Concerns
The Senate leadership vote concluded with Honorio Henríquez securing the presidency with 56 votes, defeating Alfredo Deluque, who received 45 votes. The Centro Democrático, which holds 17 seats, had championed Henríquez’s candidacy, positioning him as a figure of dialogue and transparency. Former president Álvaro Uribe praised the result, describing Henríquez as a “mesurado” and “transparente” choice for the role.
Following the vote, the Centro Democrático issued a formal statement on X, formerly Twitter, outlining its legislative agenda. The party plans to back government proposals focused on security, the recovery of private enterprise, a reduced state, and social policies. However, the party also voiced unease regarding what it described as an “intervención percibida” by the incoming government in the legislative leadership selection.
Did You Know?
The selection of the Senate president for the 2026-2027 term involved a highly contested process where the Centro Democrático, despite being the second-largest bancada, successfully pushed for Honorio Henríquez against a coalition of parties including Cambio Radical, the Partido de la U, the Partido Conservador, and Salvación Nacional.
President-Elect Abelardo De La Espriella’s Response
In a video published on July 21, President-elect Abelardo De La Espriella denied claims of interference in the Senate elections. He stated that his actions were guided by the principle of “equilibrio institucional” and a commitment to the separation of powers. De La Espriella specifically refuted allegations that he reached out to senators to solicit votes or offer benefits such as contracts, positions, or “prevendas.”
The president-elect explained that he had initially considered having Enrique Gómez, director of the Movimiento de Salvación Nacional, present him with the presidential sash. He ultimately withdrew the idea, noting that Gómez’s brother will be the Minister of Finance and his son will occupy the chief of staff role of the Presidency. De La Espriella maintained that he remained neutral during the negotiations between legislative factions.
Future Legislative Outlook
The relationship between the new government and the Centro Democrático remains in a state of flux. Álvaro Uribe has publicly stated that while his party intends to support the president-elect’s initiatives, they remain vigilant against perceived attempts to undermine the party. Uribe warned that the party would defend itself as “abejitas laboriosas” if the new administration acts against them.

Political observers may watch for the first major legislative debates to see if the Senate leadership can balance the executive’s policy agenda with the independence of the legislative branch. The upcoming term will likely test the administration’s stated commitment to “no va a haber presiones” and whether the current legislative alliances hold firm.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the stance of the Centro Democrático toward the new government?
The party stated it will support initiatives related to security, private enterprise, a reduced state, and social policies, provided they align with their own positions.

Did the president-elect influence the Senate vote?
Abelardo De La Espriella denied interfering in the election, stating he respected the independence of the legislative branch and did not call any senators to request votes or offer benefits.
Why did the Centro Democrático express concern?
The party expressed concern over an “intervención percibida” by the incoming government during the Senate leadership election and identified “ciertos gestos de confrontación” from the administration.
How will the legislative branch navigate the disagreements between the executive and the opposition in the coming months?
Related reading