During a hearing at the High Anti-Corruption Court on May 13, prosecutors presented evidence regarding private communications between former Office of the President chief Andriy Yermak and a woman identified by investigators as Veronika Fedorovna Anikeyev.
According to the prosecution, Anikeyev—described as a probable fortune teller—allegedly used a specialized telephone dedicated exclusively to communicating with Yermak. The presentation of these message fragments is part of an ongoing investigation into the former official’s conduct.
Evidence of Strategic Correspondence
The prosecution detailed a specific exchange occurring on December 24, 2025. This message was reportedly sent by a contact labeled “Andrey 2025″—believed to be Yermak—to Anikeyev during a search conducted at Yermak’s driver’s location.
In that specific message, the contact sent the names “Klymenko, Kryvonos,” referring to the heads of the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAP) and the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU). The correspondence reveals Anikeyev urging Yermak to adopt a “sharp” stance and engage in “active resistance” against opponents whom she claimed were “psychologically terrorizing” both parties.
Anikeyev’s messages contained strong warnings regarding Yermak’s political survival. She suggested that his current strategy was akin to an “ostrich strategy” and warned that if he did not act, his opponents would eventually target his allies. She further noted that while he currently has a “friend-guarantor,” the lack of serious evidence might change if his opponents gain power, suggesting that fleeing abroad could be a necessary consideration.
In response to these warnings, the prosecutor stated that Yermak listed several individuals and entities, including Fiala, Ukrainska Pravda, Tkach, Musaeva, Zheleznyak, Arakhamia, and Honcharenko. He reportedly responded with the statement: “I am ready for everything. I am ready for everything. Tomorrow I am ready.”
Potential Legal and Political Implications
The disclosure of this correspondence could serve as a pivotal element in the court’s evaluation of Yermak’s activities. The focus on his communications with a non-state actor during a period of intense investigation may influence how the court views his interactions with anti-corruption authorities.
Moving forward, the legal proceedings may intensify as the court weighs the significance of these private discussions. The implications for the broader political landscape could be substantial, as the case examines the boundaries between private consultation and official state conduct.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is Veronika Fedorovna Anikeyev in relation to this case?
According to investigators, she is a woman, described as a probable fortune teller, who allegedly maintained a dedicated phone line to consult with Andriy Yermak.
What was the content of the message sent on December 24, 2025?
A contact believed to be Yermak sent the names of the heads of SAP and NABU—Klymenko and Kryvonos—to Anikeyev.
How did Yermak respond to the warnings in the correspondence?
Yermak reportedly listed several names, including Fiala and Ukrainska Pravda, and stated, “I am ready for everything. I am ready for everything. Tomorrow I am ready.”
How should the use of non-official advisors by high-ranking officials be viewed in a legal context?
