Reza Pahlavi Slams European Media Bias After Berlin Visit

by Chief Editor

Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of Iran’s last Shah, has issued a sharp rebuke of European media following recent visits to Berlin and Stockholm. Pahlavi accused journalists of “silencing” the voices of the Iranian people by failing to address critical human rights issues during his press conferences.

Accusations of “Silencing” and Media Bias

Pahlavi expressed deep disappointment, claiming that not a single question was asked regarding the thousands of Iranians he says were “slaughtered” by the regime in January. He also noted a lack of inquiries regarding the recent executions of political prisoners by the Mullah regime.

The 65-year-old stated that journalists in the heart of a continent claiming to stand for dignity and human rights have “fully abandoned” their professional responsibilities and moral objectivity. According to Pahlavi, the media appeared more interested in criticizing the United States and Israel than the Iranian regime.

Did You Know? Reza Pahlavi has lived in exile for decades, having left Iran even before the Islamic Revolution of 1979.

Calls for Regime Change in Berlin

During his appearance at the federal press conference venue in Berlin on April 23, 2026, Pahlavi called for the total overthrow of Iran’s leadership. He urged European governments to stop appeasing the current power system, describing the regime as a “wounded beast” that has never been as fragile as it is now.

From Instagram — related to Pahlavi, Iran

Pahlavi warned that stability is impossible if even a “watered-down version” of the current system survives. He positioned himself as a potential leader for a democratic transition should the leadership be toppled.

Expert Insight: The tension between Pahlavi’s demands and the European media’s approach highlights a significant gap in perspective. While Pahlavi views the regime as an imminent collapse, the journalistic focus on international actors like the US and Israel suggests a preference for analyzing geopolitical stability over the internal revolutionary goals of the exiled opposition.

Security Incidents and Political Friction

Pahlavi’s visit was marked by a security incident in which he was splashed with a red liquid, identified as tomato sauce, by a protester. Police detained a man following the attack, though the incident did not appear to deter Pahlavi, who continued to wave to supporters.

"ENOUGH CHANCES": Reza Pahlavi Slams Europe for Yielding to Tehran's Blackmail | DRM News | AH1C

Beyond the media, Pahlavi reported friction with political figures. In a post on X, he expressed disappointment over a conversation with a member of parliament who suggested that Iranians might not yet be ready for democracy.

Symbolism and Support

While Pahlavi is seen as a symbol of transition for Iranians in exile, reports indicate he may not have a broad following within Iran itself. His role is often viewed through the lens of his family’s history as an authoritarian dynasty.

His primary support comes from secular Iranians or those who left the country following the fall of the Pahlavis. Despite the challenges, Pahlavi vowed on X to continue fighting “even if we must do it alone” until Iran is free.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Reza Pahlavi criticizing European journalists?

Pahlavi claims that European media are “silencing” Iranians by ignoring the “slaughter” of thousands in January and the execution of political prisoners, focusing instead on criticizing the US and Israel.

Frequently Asked Questions
Pahlavi Iran Iranians

What happened to Reza Pahlavi during his Berlin visit?

In addition to delivering a speech calling for regime change, Pahlavi was splashed with a red liquid by a protester as he left the federal press conference building.

Who currently supports Reza Pahlavi’s movement?

He is primarily supported by secular Iranians and those who left Iran after the Pahlavi dynasty was overthrown.

Do you believe international media should prioritize the goals of exiled opposition leaders or focus on the diplomatic stability of existing regimes?

You may also like

Leave a Comment