Rural Epilepsy Care Faces Significant Service Gaps
Rural and remote Australians living with epilepsy face higher health costs and hospitalisation rates compared to city residents, according to the Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine (ACRRM). Data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) reveals that epilepsy-related health system costs reach $4.3 million per 100,000 population in very remote areas, nearly double the $2.5 million expenditure in major cities. With epilepsy-related hospitalisations occurring 2.1 times more frequently in remote regions, ACRRM warns that the current health system is failing these communities, citing fragmented services and shortages of specialist care.
Disparities in Specialist Access and Hospital Reliance
The geographic concentration of neurologists remains a primary barrier to equitable care. Research cited by ACRRM indicates that while 31% of the Australian population resides outside major cities, these areas are served by only 4.1% of the nation’s neurologists. This lack of local specialist support forces a reliance on public hospital services, which account for over two-thirds of total epilepsy expenditure. Epilepsy Queensland’s submission to the Senate inquiry further notes that patients in the bush contend with additional challenges, including out-of-pocket travel costs, limited access to telehealth during initial diagnosis, and fewer available ambulance services.
Did you know?
Indigenous Australians are twice as likely to have epilepsy as non-Indigenous people. The ACRRM submission advocates for a culturally appropriate approach to treatment that is designed and led by the community to address higher rates of acuity and hospitalisation.
Proposed Pathways for Improved Rural Outcomes
Improving outcomes for patients with epilepsy requires more than just increasing the number of specialists, according to ACRRM. The organisation is calling for enhanced training, appropriate remuneration, and incentives for rural generalists and GPs to upskill in epilepsy management. ACRRM notes that professional development in rural practice is often limited and requires dedicated funding to ensure clinicians have the paid time necessary to implement new treatment pathways. Furthermore, the submission suggests that a holistic model—incorporating neurology-trained nurses, telehealth-enabled first-seizure clinics, and social support services—is essential to bridging the current service gap.
The Path to the Senate Inquiry Final Report
The Senate inquiry into epilepsy, which closed its submission period on 15 May 2026, has gathered 187 perspectives on the state of the system. A public hearing held at the Queensland Parliament House recently featured a panel of people with lived experience, underscoring the urgency of addressing medication access and diagnosis barriers. With one in three people living with epilepsy estimated to be medication-resistant, these systemic delays carry significant health consequences. Additional public hearings are scheduled across Victoria, Tasmania, South Australia, and the Northern Territory throughout August, with a final report due to be delivered by 10 September 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why are epilepsy costs higher in remote areas?
Costs are higher due to increased reliance on public hospital services. According to the AIHW, hospitalisation rates for epilepsy are 2.1 times higher in remote and very remote areas, driving up total expenditure compared to major cities.
What is ACRRM proposing to fix the service gap?
ACRRM is calling for better referral pathways, enhanced training for rural generalists and GPs, and financial incentives for upskilling. They also advocate for the integration of specialist nurses and telehealth-enabled clinics.
When will the Senate inquiry findings be released?
The final report for the Senate inquiry into epilepsy in Australia is scheduled for release on 10 September 2026.
Are you or a loved one navigating epilepsy care in a regional area? Share your experiences in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for updates on the Senate inquiry findings as they are released.
Worth a look