Extensive roadwork in Sint-Gillis has triggered widespread frustration among residents, local business owners, and public transport users, according to local officials and transit representatives. The ongoing construction at the Bareel has led to significant disruptions, including the suspension of tram lines 81, 4, and 10, the total service halt of tram 97, and the rerouting of bus 50. Since June 29, the temporary bus 96—originally introduced to provide an alternative for tram line interruptions—has also been diverted via Hallepoort, deepening concerns over accessibility and safety in the municipality.
Why the current situation is under scrutiny
Mayor Jean Spinette (PS) has publicly labeled the current traffic situation in Sint-Gillis as “unsustainable.” In an Instagram statement, the mayor highlighted that the combination of daily changes to transit routes and poor communication has created a dangerous environment for cyclists, motorists, and pedestrians. Local traders, particularly at the Bareel, report a sharp decline in revenue due to the restricted access. Furthermore, the mayor noted that large trucks frequently become wedged in narrow streets, creating hazardous conditions for the local population.
Did You Know? The temporary bus line 96 was specifically launched to mitigate the impact of ongoing tram line interruptions, but it is now itself subject to diversions due to the latest phase of construction at the Bareel.
What are the proposed solutions?
Mayor Spinette and Catherine Morenville, the schepen of Mobility (Ecolo), have formally requested an urgent meeting with the MIVB, Brussels Mobility, and the Minister of Mobility, Elke Van den Brandt (Groen). The goal is to address the lack of clear communication, as existing information boards are often outdated or provide contradictory instructions. While the mayor acknowledged that the MIVB faces challenges in updating signage due to the rapidly changing construction phases, he emphasized that solutions must be found immediately rather than months down the line.
Expert Insight: The friction between municipal leadership and transit authorities highlights the difficulty of managing urban infrastructure in a dense city like Brussels. When multiple, simultaneous projects intersect with public transport hubs, the resulting “cascading failure”—where a temporary relief line itself becomes a bottleneck—often leaves local businesses and residents bearing the economic and logistical costs.
What may happen next
The MIVB has stated that it is in constant contact with the municipality, though it notes there are no simple solutions available. Spokesperson Guy Sablon indicated that the transit authority cannot increase the number of buses or drivers further, as the frequency is already at capacity. The agency is currently relying on the summer holiday period to reduce passenger numbers and alleviate pressure on the system. Meanwhile, the organization for Brussels Public Transport Users (GeBOV) continues to advocate for increased service frequency for bus 96 between Drievuldigheid and the South Station, alongside the establishment of a temporary tram terminal at the Bareel.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is bus 96 currently being diverted?
The bus is being rerouted via Hallepoort because the construction work at the Bareel entered a new phase on June 29.
What is the stance of the MIVB regarding the complaints?
The MIVB, represented by spokesperson Guy Sablon, acknowledges the frustration of passengers and local residents. However, the agency maintains that it cannot add more buses or drivers to the current service levels.
What are the local authorities asking for?
Mayor Jean Spinette and schepen Catherine Morenville are seeking an urgent meeting with regional transport stakeholders and the Minister of Mobility to improve communication and find immediate solutions to the current traffic and safety issues.
How do you believe the city could better balance the need for infrastructure upgrades with the immediate operational needs of local commuters?
