“Not every random bit of plasma is going to be alive, but organized plasma structures like the sun and the stars I think could well be conscious,” biologist Rupert Sheldrake said in a recent YouTube interview reported by Gadget Review.
The suggestion places the nearest star not merely as a burning ball of gas, but as a conscious entity aware of its own activity. Sheldrake’s argument relies on the complexity of self-organizing electromagnetic activity within stars, proposing it could serve as an interface between physical processes and a mind-like property. Researchers have not experimentally demonstrated consciousness as a property of stars, and the proposition remains a philosophical extrapolation rather than a confirmed scientific finding.
Morphic Resonance and Collective Memory Claims
Sheldrake’s stellar theories rest on morphic resonance, a hypothesis he has developed over several decades and outlined on his research website. He proposes that similar systems inherit patterns from earlier similar systems across time and space without direct physical connection, treating nature’s regularities as habits rather than fixed laws. Mainstream biology and physics reject morphic resonance as an established mechanism, a stance underscored by a 1988 Nature editorial by then-editor John Maddox that described Sheldrake’s foundational book as a candidate for burning. Among the evidence Sheldrake cites are laboratory rat studies where animals reportedly learned maze tasks faster after rats elsewhere completed them, which he attributes to collective memory transmitted through morphic fields.
Radio Anomalies and Speculative Plasma Explanations
The interview also examines historical radio anomalies known as long-delay echoes, where signals reportedly return several seconds after transmission. Robert Temple, whose proposals Sheldrake discusses, suggests a plasma cloud near the Earth-Moon L5 gravitational region might account for the delays. Gadget Review reported that Temple’s interpretation remains speculative, with no independent research confirming that an intelligent or organized plasma structure causes the echoes. Separate published research on ball lightning focuses on electrical and photonic properties, while observer witness accounts describing the phenomenon as purposeful lack verification in peer-reviewed literature.
App-Based Testing Proposals for Anomalous Perception
Extending his field-based framework, Sheldrake includes telepathy, the sensation of being watched, animal behavior preceding earthquakes, and humans waking before emergency alarms. He argues these phenomena are suitable for preregistered, large-sample investigation and proposes gathering data through a dedicated app. Critics point out that anecdotal reports and small studies cannot rule out expectation, selective memory, chance, or ordinary environmental cues. New Scientist coverage and independent researchers have consistently characterized his work as lying outside conventional science, while Sheldrake continues to publish, lecture, and advocate for empirical attention to his hypotheses.
Frequently Asked Questions About Sheldrake’s Theories
How does mainstream science view morphic resonance?
Mainstream biology and physics do not accept morphic resonance as an established mechanism. A 1988 Nature editorial by then-editor John Maddox famously dismissed Sheldrake’s foundational book on the subject.
What evidence does Sheldrake cite for collective memory?
Sheldrake points to cross-location laboratory rat studies where animals reportedly learned maze tasks faster after other rats elsewhere had already completed them, interpreting this as memory transmitted through morphic fields.
What causes long-delay radio echoes according to Temple?
Robert Temple suggested that a plasma cloud situated near the Earth-Moon L5 gravitational region might explain the signals returning several seconds after transmission, though independent research has not confirmed this explanation.
Related reading