Emails released by the US Department of Justice reveal that Lord Peter Mandelson sought feedback from Jeffrey Epstein on a draft of his 2010 memoir. The book focused on the rise of New Labour and Mandelson’s relationships with former Prime Ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.
A Critical Review
Epstein’s response, dated May 16, 2010, was sharply critical. He argued the book risked compromising “discretion, trust, handshakes, privacy” – qualities he suggested were essential for certain “deals.” He also offered a blunt assessment of how Blair and Brown were publicly perceived, describing Blair as “frail, flustered, tired, weak” and Brown as “flawed, demanding, pig-headed, irrationally determined.”
Epstein further characterized the draft as “not uplifting, […] gossipy and defensive,” and urged Mandelson to revise it. Mandelson, however, disputed Epstein’s assessment, stating that he had “read it too fast” and that the manuscript was still incomplete.
The Nature of the Relationship
The email exchange highlights the extent to which Mandelson valued Epstein’s counsel. The correspondence demonstrates a continued relationship between the two men after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. The released emails offer insight into this dynamic.
It remains unclear whether Mandelson incorporated Epstein’s feedback into the final version of his memoir. The release of these emails could prompt further scrutiny of the relationship between the two men and the potential influence Epstein wielded.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the subject of the book Mandelson shared with Epstein?
The book was a memoir about the rise of New Labour and Lord Mandelson’s relationships with Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.
What was Epstein’s overall assessment of the book draft?
Epstein found the draft “troubling,” describing it as “not uplifting, […] gossipy and defensive” and recommending revisions.
When was the email exchange between Mandelson and Epstein dated?
The email exchange is dated May 16, 2010.
Given the renewed attention to Epstein’s network, what further details about relationships between prominent figures and the disgraced financier might come to light?
