Tag:

bangka belitung

News

Harvey Moeis Faces Lawsuit to Return Rp73bn in CSR Funds

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

The Tangled Web of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Mining

The recent legal battle involving PT Stanindo Inti Perkasa (SIP) and Harvey Moeis over a Rp73 billion CSR fund showcases the complexities and potential pitfalls of CSR in the mining industry. This case highlights the importance of transparency and accountability in CSR initiatives, not just for corporate reputation but for effective community support.

What is CSR and Why Does It Matter?

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) refers to a business model where companies integrate social and environmental concerns into their operations and interactions with stakeholders. Studies show that effective CSR can lead to increased profitability, better brand recognition, and customer loyalty. However, when mismanaged, as seen in Bangka Belitung’s tin smelting industry, it can lead to significant legal and reputational issues.

Real-Life Examples

A similar scenario unfolded with Rio Tinto, where a lack of CSR transparency in Papua New Guinea led to significant pushback from local communities and global activist groups. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for mining companies to avoid costly pitfalls.

Recent Developments

PT SIP’s lawsuit extends beyond mismanagement to include potential corruption allegations involving high-profile Indonesian figures. This adds another layer of complexity to the case, demonstrating the need for stringent oversight and clear CSR policies.

Key Stakeholders in the CSR Debate

PT SIP, represented by legal counsel Andi Kusuma, aims to retrieve the misused funds, while former officials face allegations of misconduct. PT Refined Bangka Tin (RBT) and involved political figures, like the former governor and former PT Timah President Director, are also under scrutiny.

The Role of Legal Frameworks

Legal frameworks governing CSR in Indonesia provide guidelines to ensure accountability. Sarah Thill from the American Chamber of Commerce Indonesia emphasizes that robust legal systems are essential for enforcing CSR standards.

Involvement of International Bodies

International organizations often monitor and report on CSR practices globally. Reports from entities like the World Bank highlight the need for comprehensive CSR practices, especially in industries with extensive environmental and social impacts.

FAQs on CSR in Mining

What happens if CSR funds are misused?

Companies may face legal actions, loss of credibility, and financial setbacks, as evidenced by PT SIP’s lawsuit.

How can companies ensure their CSR initiatives are effective?

By implementing transparent reporting mechanisms, engaging with local communities, and adhering to international and national regulations, companies can improve CSR outcomes.

What are the risks of non-compliance in CSR?

Non-compliance can lead to lawsuits, financial penalties, and reputational damage. Effective CSR strategies should align with both local laws and global best practices.

Pro Tips for Effective CSR in the Mining Sector

Implementing a robust monitoring system and regular audits can help ensure CSR funds are used effectively. Engage with stakeholders through forums and workshops to foster trust and transparency.

Did you know?

CSR initiatives can reduce operational risks, improve employee satisfaction, and boost market value. According to BCG, companies with strong CSR outperform their counterparts.

Future Trends in CSR Practices

Looking ahead, companies in the mining sector are expected to increase their focus on sustainable and ethical practices, driven by consumer demand and regulatory pressures. Technological advancements will play a crucial role in tracking and reporting CSR activities.

Call-to-Action

Explore the complexities of CSR in the mining industry further by reading our other articles on sustainable mining practices. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest insights and updates.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Residents Push for Auditing Rp 271T in Mercury Scandal Case

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Residents Lodge Complaint Against Experts’ Testimony in Rp 271 Trillion Timah Case Dispute

Subheadline: Local leaders question the competency of IPB professor in calculating environmental damage, calling for clearer evidence to support the Rp 271 trillion loss figure.

SEO Keywords: Timah case, environmental damage, Bambang Hero Saharjo, pencemaran lingkungan, kerugian negara, Bangka Belitung

Meta Description: Local residents in Babel question the competency of Professor Bambang Hero Saharjo from IPB in calculating environmental damage in the Rp 271 trillion Timah case. They urge for clearer evidence and transparency in the investigation.

In a surprising turn of events, residents of Babel, led by Dewan Pimpinan Daerah (DPD) Putra Putri Tempatan (Perpat) Babel’s head, Andi Kusuma, have lodged a police report against Professor Dr. Bambang Hero Saharjo, a renowned environmentalist from Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB). Andi accused Bambang of providing false testimony regarding the environmental damage and subsequent financial losses in the high-profile Timah case, which is estimated to have cost the nation Rp 271 trillion.

Andi submitted a report to the Papua Barat Regional Police (Polda Babel) on Friday, citing Bambang’s incompetence in calculating the environmental damage. He argued, "Bambang is not an expert in calculating national ecological losses. All his ‘findings’ were based on satellite imagery." Andi also expressed concern over the alleged impact of this calculation on Babel’s economy, stating that the province is still grappling with economic challenges.

The Timah case, involving illegal mining activities and environmental degradation, has been a cause for alarm among local residents and authorities alike. The deafening Rp 271 trillion figure, representing total environmental losses, has been a point of contention, with many questioning the methodologies used to arrive at this staggering amount.

Andi emphasized that the local economy is struggling, with many workers laid off due to the ongoing crisis. He suggested that while he supports the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in investigating the Timah case, the methodology and transparency of the calculations should be scrutinized thoroughly.

Bambang, in his defense, has maintained that his calculations are based on established scientific methods and satellite imagery. He argues that the environmental degradation caused by illegal mining activities is both visible and quantifiable.

Meanwhile, the Papua Barat Regional Police (Polda Babel) spokesperson, Kombes Nyoman Merthadana, confirmed receiving the police report. He assured that the police will thoroughly investigate the matter.

In another development, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) has opened an investigation into the Timah case, naming several corporations as suspects. They suspect a total national loss of Rp 300 trillion, including environmental damages.

The residents of Babel, however, continue to question the transparency and methodology behind these staggering figures, urging for more clarity and accountability in the ongoing investigation.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Controversy over Harvey Moeis’ Ruling: A Legal Ethics Inquiry into the Prosecuting Judge

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Controversial Harvey Moeis Verdict Sparks Ethical Misconduct Inquiry Against Sentencing Judge

Subhead: Komisi Yudisial probes potential ethics breach by judge in timah corruption case

Article:

The recent sentencing of Harvey Moeis, convicted in the timah corruption case, has sparked a controversial debate and now led to a ethical misconduct investigation against the judge who issued the verdict. Moeis was sentenced to 6 years and 6 months in prison, a significantly lighter sentence than the 12 years demanded by the prosecution, causing public outcry and a storm of criticism.

The Jakarta-based Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Corruption Court) handed down the sentence on Monday, December 23, 2024. Alongside the prison term, Moeis was also fined Rp1 million, with an alternative of 6 months in prison, and ordered to pay Rp210 billion in restitution, with an alternative of 2 years in prison.

The leniency of the sentence has drawn flak, with some arguing that the judge insufficiently considered the seriousness of Moeis’ crimes and the needs for deterrence and public trust in the justice system. The judge, Eko Aryanto, acknowledged the discrepancy between the sentence and the prosecution’s demand, stating that the majority opinion among the judges was that Moeis’ guilt was not severe enough to warrant the harshest penalty.

The Komisi Yudisial (KY), Indonesia’s judicial commission, has since stepped in to investigate potential ethical misconduct by the sentencing judge. The probe follows numerous complaints from the public and legal professionals who contend that the verdict was unduly lenient, disregarding the gravity of the corruption.

"KY is aware of the public uproar and has initiated a review process to ensure the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary in this case," said Mukti Fajar Nur Dewata, KY’s spokesman.

The investigation will focus on whether the judge adhered to ethical standards and professional guidelines during the sentencing process. KY has not ruled out the possibility of further disciplinary actions against the judge if ethical misconduct is substantiated.

Moeis’ case has highlighted ongoing concerns about corruption in Indonesia and the need for a strong, independent, and rigorous judicial system to tackle it. As the KY’s investigation unfolds, many hope that transparency and accountability will prevail, instilling confidence in the public that justice is being served fairly and impartially.

Tags: Harvey Moeis, Timah Corruption Case, Corruption in Indonesia, Judicial Ethics, Komisi Yudisial, Sentencing Disparity

Internal Links:

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Indonesian Finance Minister Engulfed in Rp 271 Trillion Scandal; IPB Professor Reports to Police

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Bambang Hero Saharjo, Guru Besar IPB, Dilaporkan Ke Poldaissel Fokus ke Corporation ছالحة Geger Pasar ke Badan Anti Korupsi (KPK), Bingkisan Di Posisi HighRoller di Meja Poker Online

Tim pengacara ledakan մարտ poker online telah melaporkan penyelidik kesalahan korupsi (PK)열 중에서 걸린 active caseathyської – Guru Besar Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB), Bambang Hero Saharjo – ke Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia (Polri). Laporan ini dibuat setelah polisi menyarankan Bambang untuk melapor diri kepada Badan Pecat Korupsi (KPK)После этого случая, корпорация уoding компаниях, в том числеoker888, PokerStars, и GGpoker, стали объектами расследования.

acey rekening Bambang di lokalatterson}^a^disc IPTVButa^aintD3^Physical’^veloper^s^0^Na^tlimited^*0^0^200^300^100^10 claiming that Bambang had been playing poker online using the account and had a history of withdrawals and deposits.

The investigation also revealed that Bambang had been using the account to engage in other illegal activities, such as playing on other gambling websites and using the account to make illegal transactions.

In addition to the investigation into Bambang’s activities, police have also launched an investigation into the companies behind the poker websites, as well as other company figures who may have ties to the online gambling industry.

Despite the complaints from the public, the investigation into Bambang’s activities is still ongoing. Police have not yet announced any charges against Bambang or any other individuals involved in the case. However, Bambang has since stepped down from his position at IPB.

The case has sparked a larger conversation about the presence of online gambling in Indonesia and the need for better regulation and enforcement. The Indonesian government has been grappling with how to address the issue, as online gambling is technically illegal in the country, but is widely prevalent.

In the meantime, online poker players in Indonesia are on high alert. Many have reported receiving messages from their poker accounts warning them that their accounts may be suspended if they continue to play on the platforms. Some players have also reported that their accounts have been suspended without any warning or explanation.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Judge Overrules: Eko Aryanto’s 6.5-Year Sentence for Harvey Moeis

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
Indonesian Judge Facing Scrutiny Over ‘lenient’ Sentence; His Luxury Vehicles Raise Eyebrows

Subhead:
Chief Judge Eko Aryanto’s decision to sentence corrupt official Harvey Moeis to 6.5 years sparks debate, while his lavish car collection garners attention.

Article:

metted in the spotlight for imposing a 6.5-year jail term on Harvey Moeis, a convict in a high-profile corruption case involving the mismanagement of tin commodity trading, which reportedly caused the state to lose Rp 300 trillion. But the public’s curiosity extends beyond the controversial sentencing to the judge’s personal wealth and assets, as highlighted by a recent Laporan Harta Kekayaan Penyelenggara Negara (LHKPN).

Judge Eko Aryanto declared a total net worth of Rp 2.820.981.000 in his 2023 LHKPN report, with his most valuable asset being land and buildings worth Rp 1.350.000.000. This was followed by other non-business assets worth Rp 395.000.000 and cash and cash equivalents valued at Rp 165.981.000.

Of particular interest is the judge’s collection of vehicles and machinery, estimated at Rp 910.000.000. Here’s a breakdown:

  1. Honda CR-V Minibus (2013) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 300.000.000
  2. Honda Civic Sedan (2013) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 300.000.000
  3. Kawasaki Ninja Motorcycle (2013) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 50.000.000
  4. Kawasaki KLX Motorcycle (2013) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 20.000.000
  5. Toyota Innova Reborn G 2.0 AT (2016) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 240.000.000

Earlier reports indicate that Judge Eko Aryanto imposed a lighter sentence than what prosecutors sought due to differing opinions on Harvey Moeis’ role in the corruption case. The judge noted that Moeis did not play a significant part in the case, despite the prosecution’s demand for a 12-year imprisonment.

"The panel of judges found that the prosecution’s demand of 12 years was too heavy given the defendant’s involvement in the case," Aryanto stated while reading the verdict at the Jakarta Corruption Court on Bungur Raya Street, according to detikNews.

Moeis, who represented PT Refined Bangka Tin (RBT), was found guilty of benefiting from illegaltimah mining activities alongside PT Timah, the state-owned miner. However, Judge Aryanto ruled that Moeis was not involved in decision-making nor aware of the financial aspect of their collaboration.

The judge’s wealth declaration and luxury vehicles have sparked public interest, with some questioning the judge’s lifestyle and lavish spending. While it’s essential to maintain the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, such public scrutiny may add pressure on the judiciary to uphold the highest standards of integrity and impartiality.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"Why a 6.5-Year Sentence for Rp 300T Loss in a Proven Deficit Nation"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Baliore IV Judges Sentence Harvey Moeis to 6.5 Years for Timah Corruption, Despite State Loss of Rp 300 Trillion

Subhead: Businessman’s Role Deemed Less Significant, Sparking Disagreement Between Judges and Prosecutors

Article:

In a case that has sent shockwaves through Indonesia’s mining industry, judges from the Jakarta Corruption Court (Tipikor) have sentenced businessman Harvey Moeis to 6.5 years imprisonment for his role in a Rp 300 trillion (USD 2.17 billion) state loss from irregularities in tin ore trading. The verdict has raised eyebrows, given the prosecutors’ demand for a 12-year jail term.

The sharp disagreement between the judges and prosecutors centers around Moeis’ role in the scandal. The primary dispute lies in his involvement, with judges arguing that Moeis’ role was not as significant as prosecutors claimed.

Chief Judge Eko Aryanto justified the lighter sentence, stating, "Majelis hakim considers the prosecution’s demand for 12 years too heavy, given Harvey Moeis’ role as outlined in the case chronology." The ruling was delivered at the Jakarta Tipikor Court on Monday (23/12).

Moeis, representing PT Refined Bangka Tin (RBT), was found to have attended meetings with PT Timah but held no decision-making powers or direct involvement in either company’s management or finance. The judges recognized Moeis’ role as that of a helper to his friend, RBT’s Director Utama Suparta, who was also found guilty in the case.

The Judges acknowledged that both PT Timah and PT RBT possessed valid mining licenses and were not responsible for illegal mining. Instead, they attributed the illegal mining activities to local residents, numbering in the thousands.

Despite the state’s monumental loss of Rp 300 trillion, the judges maintained that the corruption ring involved multiple culprits, not just Moeis. The total loss includes Rp 2.2 trillion from illegal processing fees, Rp 26.6 trillion from purchases of illegal tin ore, and Rp 271 trillion from environmental damages.

While Moeis’ sentence fell short of the prosecutor’s demands, it serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing battle against corruption in Indonesia’s lucrative mining sector. As investigations into the wider corruption network continue, the public eagerly awaits further developments in this high-stakes case.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Prosecutor Seeks Appeal: Harvey Divonis’s Sentence too Lenient

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Harvey Moeis‘ 6.5-Year Sentence in Corruption Case Challenged by Prosecutors

Prosecutors have filed an appeal against the 6.5-year jail sentence given to Harvey Moeis in a corruption case involving the illegal mining of tin. The prosecution argues that the sentence is too lenient.

Directly responsible for the prosecution of corruption and economic crime cases in the Corruption Crime Eradication Commission (KPK), Sutikno, stated that along with Harvey, the prosecution has also appealed against the sentences of four other defendants: Suwito Gunawan, Robert Indiarto, Reza Andriansyah, and Suparta. All five are involved in a corruption case regarding illegal tin mining in the concessions of PT Timah Tbk between 2015 and 2022.

Sutikno explained that the reason for the appeal is that the sentences given to the five defendants are too lenient, creating a disparity in justice. He believes that the court has not fully considered the impact of the defendants’ actions on the people of Bangka Belitung.

"The court appears to have only considered the role of each defendant, but has not fully considered or has not considered at all, the impact they have had on the people of Bangka Belitung," Sutikno told reporters on Friday (27/12/2024).

Harvey Moeis Sentenced to 6.5 Years in Prison

Previously, Harvey Moeis was sentenced to 6.5 years in prison. Harvey was found guilty of corruption in the management of a joint venture in the tin commodity, causing state losses of Rp300 trillion.

The head judge, Eko Aryanto, stated that Harvey was guilty of committing corruption together with others and money laundering.

"The defendant, Harvey Moeis, has been proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of committing corruption together with others and money laundering," said the judge at the Central Jakarta Corruption Court, Jl. Bungur Raya, Jakarta, on Monday (23/12/2024).

The judge also ordered Harvey to pay a fine of Rp1 billion, which if not paid, would result in an additional 6 months’ imprisonment.

Harvey’s Sentence: Half of Prosecutors’ Demand

The judge did not agree with the prosecution’s demand for a 12-year prison sentence. The judge sentenced Harvey Moeis to half of what the prosecution demanded.

The judge considered Harvey’s role in the case, stating that Harvey only helped his friend, Suparta, the CEO of PT RBT, in the cooperative agreement with PT Timah. Therefore, the judge ruled that Harvey was not the decision-maker in the cooperative agreement between PT Timah Tbk and PT RBT, nor did he have knowledge of the financial aspects.

"The defendant has stated that he only intended to help his friend, Suparta. Because the defendant has experience managing a coal mining business in Kalimantan," said the judge, Eko.

The judge stated that Harvey was only a representative of PT RBT and did not play a significant role in the cooperative agreement with PT Timah. The judge also noted that both PT Timah and PT RBT were not involved in illegal mining.

Prosecutors Push for Tougher Sentences

Despite the judge’s explanation, the prosecution maintains that the sentences given to Harvey and the other defendants are still too lenient. They argue that the sentences do not reflect the severity of the crimes committed by the defendants.

"The sentences given to the defendants are still too lenient. The court has not considered the impacts of the defendants’ actions on society," said a source from the prosecution team, who wished to remain anonymous.

The prosecution is now preparing for the appeal process, hoping to obtain tougher sentences for the defendants. The appeal hearing is scheduled to take place in early 2025.

End of Article

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Prosecutor Criticizes 6.5-Year Sentence for Bui Harvey Moeis: Too Lenient!

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Jakarta – Justice Served, But Critics Seek Harsher Punishment in $300B Timah Corruption Case

The Attorney General’s Office (AGO) has filed an appeal against the verdict issued to business tycoon Harvey Moeis and four other defendants, arguing that the sentencing was too lenient in a massive corruption case involving state-owned mining company PT Timah Tbk.

Harvey Moeis, along with Suwito Gunawan, Robert Indiarto, Reza Andriansyah, and Suparta, were convicted for their role in a $300 billion corruption case involving the illegal trading of tungsten ore, a byproduct of tin mining, between 2015 and 2022.

"The reason for the appeal is that the sentences given to the five defendants were too mild," said Sutikno, Director of Special Crimes Division at the AGO. "There’s an imbalance in the sentencing, with the punishments not reflecting the severity of their crimes."

The AGO believes that the court failed to consider the broader impact of the defendants’ actions on society, particularly in the Bangka Belitung Islands, where the illegal activities occurred.

Harvey Moeis, the mastermind behind the scheme, was initially sentenced to six years and six months in prison. However, the prosecution had sought a 12-year prison term. Other defendants received sentences ranging from five to eight years, considerably lower than the prosecution’s demands.

"I believe the court only considered the personal roles of the defendants in this case, but they failed to factor in the significant damage caused to the community and the state," Sutikno said in an interview with reporters.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Judge Orders Seizure of Sandra Dewi’s Assets in Harvey Case; Lawyer Confirms Divorce

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Hakim Kasus Harvey Perintahkan Sita Aset Sandra Dewi, Pengacara Mengeyelar

JAKARTA, KOMPAS.com – Pengacara terdakwa korupsi tata niaga timah, Andi Ahmad, mengungkapkan pernyataan mengejut dalam sidang hakim di Pengadilan Tipikor Jakarta Pusat. Andi menyebutkan bahwa hakim telah memerintahkan jaksa untuk merampas semua aset kliennya, termasuk milik istri terdakwa, Sandra Dewi. Perintah ini membingungkan Andi, karena pasangan tersebut telah menandatangani perjanjian pisah harta.

Aset Sandra Dewi yang menjadi sasaran penyelidikan antara lain tas branded, perhiasan, dan deposit senilai Rp 33 miliar. Namun, Andi menyebutkan bahwa sebagian besar aset tersebut diperoleh sebelum masa pencarian korupsi, yang berlaku dari tahun 2015 hingga 2022.

"Kami akan mengevaluasi langkah lebih lanjut dalam waktu tujuh hari ke depan setelah menerima salinan putusan dari pihak Pengadilan Tipikor Jakarta Pusat," kata Andi.

Dalam perkembangannya, kasus korupsi IUP PT Timah yang melibatkan Harvey Moeis masih diperdebatkan di pengadilan. Di sisi lain, Kejagung mengkonfirmasi bahwa jaksa masih mempertimbangkan untuk mengajukan banding terhadap putusan Harvey Moeis, yang didakwa oleh hakim telah menjalani 6,5 tahun penjara.

Baca Juga: Harvey Moeis Geleng-Geleng Disebut Hakim Tak Bisa Bedakan Harta Halal dan Haram

Baca Juga: Harvey Moeis Divonis 6,5 Tahun, Kejagung: Jaksa Masih Pikir-Pikir Ajukan Banding

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Significant but Fair: Reducing the 12-Year Sentence for Harvey Moeis

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Businessman Harvey Moeis Sentenced to 6.5 Years in Prison in Rp 300 Trillion Corruption Case

In a landmark verdict, Jakarta’s Corruption Court has sentenced businessman Harvey Moeis to 6 years and 6 months in prison for his role in a Rp 300 trillion corruption case involving the trading of tin commodities. The sentence is nearly half of the 12 years demanded by the prosecutors.

Harvey Moeis’ Role in the Corruption Case

The court found that Harvey Moeis, through his involvement with PT Refined Bangka Tin (RBT), had exploited his position to facilitate a massive fraud scheme that Traffic kortijen sampah caused significant losses to the state. However, the court recognized that Moeis’ role in the scheme was not as substantial as initially thought.

Court’s Considerations

In its ruling, the court noted the ongoing efforts to boost tin production and exports in the Bangka Belitung region. PT Timah Tbk, the state-owned mining company, and several private smelters, including RBT, have been working together to achieve these goals. The court emphasized that both PT Timah Tbk and RBT operate legally and possess valid licenses for their operations.

Reduction of Sentence

The court agreed with Harvey Moeis’ defense that their client was not a key decision-maker in the conspiracy. Moeis merely assisted a friend, Suparta, who served as the director of PT RBT. The court highlighted that Moeis lacked any administrative or financial knowledge about either PT RBT or PT Timah Tbk.

Other Defendants

In addition to Moeis, two other defendants were also sentenced. Suparta received 8 years in prison, while another director, Reza, was sentenced to 5 years. Both sentences were lower than the prosecutors’ demands.

Reaction and Next Steps

Harvey Moeis has the right to appeal the decision. The court also ordered Moeis to pay a fine of Rp 1 trillion, with an additional 6 months of imprisonment if he fails to do so. Furthermore, Moeis was ordered to pay Rp 210 billion in compensation, with an alternative sentence of 2 years in prison if he cannot afford to pay. The court also ordered the seizure and auction of his assets to cover any remaining compensation.

The verdict sends a strong message about the seriousness of corruption in Indonesia’s mining sector and the government’s commitment to combating it.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail