: Technology & Media :: RBC

The website will publish reports on which places people around the world have visited more often and which less often. While tracking movements will be in the territories of 131 countries. Celebrate, in particular, will be visits to shops and jobs

Photo: Arnd Wiegmann / Reuters

Google has created a website that will track the movement of people during the spread of the coronavirus. About it it says in the company blog.

On the website COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports will publish reports that indicate where Google users are located. At the same time, the company promises to adhere to its own privacy policy and will not disclose personal data, including geo-location or contact information.

For reports, Google will use anonymous data that will show the traffic to the most popular places, including shops, public places, pharmacies, parks, workplaces and residential premises. The company will monitor the movements of people around the world and initially plans to provide information on 131 countries.

The company notes that the reports reflect trends specific to the movement of people. They will indicate the percentage of the level of popularity of certain places, but not the absolute number of visits. Reports will include data that has been collected over several weeks, the most recent of which will show information for the last 48–72 hours.

Yandex has created a distribution map of the coronavirus

Technology and Media


Safari blocks (again) all third party cookies

After six years of designing ever more sophisticated protection systems against digital tracking, Safari blocks finally all Cookies third. “This is a significant improvement in confidentiality”, says John Wilander, creator of Safari’s “smart tracking prevention” mechanism, “Because it removes any possibility of exceptions, so” a little bit of cross-site tracking is allowed “. “

The privacy settings of Safari 13.1 in macOS Catalina 10.15.4 have been reduced to their simplest form. You no longer have a choice: all third-party cookies are blocked.

To fully understand this novelty, you have to go back… ten years back! As we began to understand how Google and Facebook, among others, used the Cookies to track their users outside their platforms, Apple had decided to block Cookies “Third parties and advertisers”. A radical decision, which had pushed Google to find a loophole, which earned him the reproaches of the FTC and $ 22.5 million fine.

At the time, Mozilla had decided to follow suit, before to flip. Apple itself has dropped ballast: in OS X Yosemite and iOS 8, in 2014, Safari no longer blocked that Cookies from websites you haven’t visited yet. In addition to the ranting of the IAB, the great association of the online advertising industry, the technical problems posed by the complete blockage justified this setback.

Since then, both Mozilla and Apple have worked on devices to distinguish legitimate uses from Cookies third of less justifiable uses. Firefox isolates Facebook in a container, block them “Social media trackers”, and incorporates mechanisms to prevent taking a “ digital print ”. Safari integrates ITP, an intelligent tracking prevention system which greatly reduces the lifespan of Cookies, and PPACA, a mechanism that governs the exchange of data between sites.

More subtle, these systems are also more complex, and have flaws into which the most stubborn players in the advertising industry infiltrate. After three years of cat and mouse play, Apple has released the full blocking of Cookies third on the table. This decision simplifies things considerably:

  • no cookie third parties can no longer be registered;
  • this closes the door to the forms of tracking that observed the state of ITP protection;
  • this greatly reduces the area of ​​exposure to attempts to take a browser fingerprint;
  • this prevents any attack through third party requests.

Obviously, it closes the door to certain legitimate uses of Cookies third party, such as authenticating a user on multiple sites through a centralized login server. For these uses, Apple recommends the API Storage Access, which stores data with the explicit consent of the user. A nail in the coffin of Cookies, including Google itself now wants the skin.


Employees – NBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth

A resident of the Great Prairie is Tarrant County’s sixth positive case on the new coronavirus and is the first alleged county coronavirus case that was transmitted locally, health officials said Tuesday.

The person has no known exposure to a confirmed case and has no recent travel history, Tarrant County health officials said in a statement.

“This sixth case was isolated at home after developing the symptoms,” said Vinny Taneja, director of public health in Tarrant County. “Due to HIPAA laws relating to the confidentiality of health information, we are not allowed to provide specific details about this patient.”

The Tarrant County Commissioners’ Court will hold an emergency meeting on Tuesday at 10 am regarding the coronavirus pandemic.

Previous cases in the county included a person who had traveled abroad from the state, the rector of Trinity Episcopal Church in Fort Worth, close contact with an American Airlines pilot who had tested positive and a student from UT Arlington. The pilot is not counted among the cases, officials said.

There are two cases of the new coronavirus in Southlake and one each in Arlington, Benbrook and White Settlement.

Tarrant County Public Health does not disclose the gender or approximate age of the patients. County labs cover a region of 33 counties for COVID-19 tests, officials said.

How to avoid the COVID-19 infection:

  • Wash your hands often with soap and water for at least 20 seconds. If soap and water are not available, use an alcohol-based hand sanitizer.
  • Avoid touching your eyes, nose and mouth with unwashed hands.
  • Avoid close contact with people who are sick.
  • Stay home when you’re sick.
  • Cover the cough or sneeze with a tissue, then throw the tissue in the trash.
  • Clean and disinfect frequently touched objects and surfaces.

* Information shared by the Office of Texas Gov. Greg Abbott


For the Sick, an agonizing wait for tests in Massachusetts – NBC Boston

Danni Aubain has cancer, so when she started feeling lousy late last month, she was particularly worried.

Aubain said the disease hit her like a ton of bricks. He had a 103-degree fever and a horrible, dry cough.

“I really couldn’t breathe,” he said, “and that’s scary for anyone undergoing chemotherapy.”

When seeking medical attention, Aubain said that both her oncologist and a Massachusetts General Hospital emergency room doctor pushed for her to be tested for COVID19, the new coronavirus disease that spreads worldwide.

But despite their recommendations, the response they got from state epidemiologists was that Aubain did not meet the test criteria.

“They called the Public Health Department and I was told that if I couldn’t name a person I knew had a positive test and that I hadn’t traveled outside the country, I couldn’t have been tested,” he said.

In response to NBC10 Boston’s questions, Mass. General said he cannot discuss the treatment of any patient.

But Aubain’s story is like so many others streamed to NBC10 Boston investigators in the past week by spectators across the state who have not been able to take a test. Many said they experienced symptoms of the disease, such as fever and shortness of breath. Like Aubain, some have also been seen by doctors who were convinced they need to be screened.

But with a shortage of test kits available in the state until the end of last week and with restrictive guidelines in place by the federal government, many said they were frustrated, scared and confused as to what to do next.

Federal officials are rapidly increasing the nation’s infrastructure to test COVID-19 this week after a series of missteps hampered the country’s ability to control the virus as it migrated from its epicenter in China to destinations around the world. As of Monday, there have been over 4,000 disease cases reported in the United States, which have so far seen over 70 deaths.

On Monday, health officials in Massachusetts announced that around 1,300 people were tested for the disease and 197 tested positive.

The state’s ability to test patients has increased significantly in the past few days when federal officials have granted Massachusetts clearance to begin testing the samples at the state’s public health laboratory, rather than sending them to a centralized, managed location. by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Federal officials also expanded their testing guidelines, offering doctors more discretion to order a test for the virus, and last week they shipped around 5,000 additional test kits to Massachusetts, easing local supply.

The CDC has also published new guidelines that allow doctors and nurses to subject a single nasal swab to tests, rather than a nasal swab and another sample from the patient’s throat. The change is expected to allow Massachusetts to double its testing capacity, bringing the number of tests conducted every day from 200 to 400, public health commissioner Monica Bharel said at a press conference on Sunday.

The Food and Drug Administration, which must approve the test sites, also granted permission at the end of last week to a couple of private companies – Quest Diagnostics and LabCorp – to begin testing samples collected from patients in Massachusetts. Massachusetts hospital labs are expected to launch their testing programs shortly.

“With more and more clinical labs in Massachusetts working to gain FDA approval, more online capabilities will also be available soon,” said Bharel on Sunday.

Federal officials say the United States is now on track to test thousands of patients a day for the virus after falling far behind other countries in its efforts to detect the virus.

Independent research cited by the CDC indicates that the United States had completed approximately 20,000 tests as of March 13. That number pales in comparison to the aggressive testing effort in South Korea, which has a much smaller population, but has tested around 15,000 people per day.

While the United States is ready to learn more about the extent of the pandemic soon, many in the Bay State who fear having contracted the disease say they believe the government has missed an important opportunity to help curb its spread.

“I have a couple of friends in my social circle who are experiencing flu-like symptoms and are just writing it as flu,” said Rita Czernewski, a Cantonese resident who had an unexplained illness a few weeks ago and was frustrated by her inability to get tested for the new coronavirus.

“We are just a little stuck,” he said. “The only thing we can do is just be careful.”


Bloomberg will free women who want to talk from their agreements | U.S

Michael Bloomberg He announced this Friday his decision to release the commitment not to speak to three women who signed confidentiality agreements on harassment and sexist comments at work, something to which the candidate for the nomination of the Democratic Party refused the past in the last debate carried out in Nevada.

“[La compañía] Bloomberg has identified three Confidentiality Agreements (NDA) signed in the last 30 years with women on comments that say that I [Mike Bloomberg] said. If any of them wants to be free of their commitment, they should contact the company and they will be released from the agreement, ”said the former mayor in a statement posted on his campaign website.

Founder and majority owner of Bloomberg LP, a company to which Bloomberg News belongs, the tycoon He was criticized last Wednesday by Senator Elizabeth Warren and other rivals during the last Democratic debate for her refusal to let former employees break the pact of silence signed with the Confidentiality Agreement and thus allow accusations against the politician to see the light public

Warren attacked Bloomberg hard in Las Vegas, Nevada. “The Democrats are not going to win if we have a candidate with a history of harassing women,” said the senator opening the ban against the billionaire. Warren insisted – and intended to start a mogul’s commitment on that stage – in the accusations that existed against Bloomberg for harassment and sexist comments and demanded that he “release” the women with whom he had signed confidentiality agreements so that they could speak freely about their experiences.

“We are not going to win Trump with a man who has who knows how many confidentiality agreements with women,” the senator warned. Bloomberg did not want to reveal how many such agreements exist and said the cases will continue in secret on the grounds that it was they, the women, who “decided with the agreement that they wanted to remain silent.”

“I have reflected a lot on this issue in recent days and have decided that while running the company we will not offer more Confidentiality Agreements to resolve complaints of sexual harassment or inappropriate behavior,” Bloomberg continues in the statement.

The candidate acknowledges that such agreements, specifically when used in a context of sexual harassment or assault, promote a culture of silence at work and contribute to women not feeling safe or supported. In his first debate since he jumped into the race for the nomination to opt for the White House, the billionaire explained that the women who had raised complaints against him of the only thing they could accuse him of had made jokes that they didn’t like.

Since this issue jumped into public opinion, Warren has not released the dam. During a meeting with voters on Thursday night, the senator was blunt to say that if Bloomberg did not let women speak and break their pacts of silence, the former mayor was “disqualified to be president of the United States.”