Tag:

jakarta pusat

News

Breaking Facts: The Recent Shooting of a Rental Boss by a TNI AL Member

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Title: Three Indonesian Navy Members Arrested for Shooting Rental Car Boss on Toll Road

SEO Keywords: Indonesian Navy, naval officers, arrested, shooting, toll road, Banten, Tangerang, Merak, rest area, rent car, boss, killed, wounded, investigation.

Meta Description: Three members of the Indonesian Navy (TNI AL) have been arrested for their alleged involvement in the shooting incident that killed a rental car boss and injured another on the Tangerang-Merak Toll Road in Banten.

Jakarta, cnnindonesia.com — Three members of the Indonesian Navy (AL) have been arrested in connection with the fatal shooting of a rental car boss on the Tangerang-Merak Toll Road Rest Area KM 45 in Jayanti, Tangerang, Banten last Thursday. The navy personnel identified as Sertu AA, Sertu RH, and KLK BA were caught and are currently being held by authorities.

The incident, which occurred in the early hours of January 2, left the rental car boss, identified by his initials IAR, dead at the scene. Another individual, identified as RAB, was injured in the shooting and is currently receiving treatment.

The Commander of the Naval Military Police (Puspom TNI AL), Laksma Samista, confirmed that the three suspects have been apprehended and are now considered suspects in the case. He also stated that the weapons used in the shooting were not homemade but rather issued by the navy as part of their official duties.

In a separate statement, the Commander of the Naval Operations Command (Pangkoarmada II), Laksdya Denih Hendrata, revealed that the three suspects were serving as Aide de Camp (ADC) or personal aides, which is why they had weapons with them at the time. Denih also noted that the suspects had been subjected to physical assault (keroyokan) by around 15 unknown individuals at the scene prior to the shooting incident.

The Jakarta Metropolitan Police (Polda Metro Jaya) are currently leading the investigation into the case. In a press conference, the head of Polda Banten, Irjen Suyudi Ario Seto, explained that the incident was preceded by an alleged vehicle theft from a rental shop in Rajeg, Tangerang, involving a Honda Brio car bearing the license plate B-2669-KZO. The car was later resold several times, ending up in the possession of the three navy suspects.

During the investigation, Polda Banten discovered instances of unprofessional conduct by a member of the Cinangka Police, Brigadir Dery Andriani, who failed to respond to a report of the car theft and did not accompany the victim to secure and impound the vehicle. Polda Banten has since initiated disciplinary proceedings against Andriani and the Cinangka Police Chief, AKP Asep Iwan Kurniawan, for their lack of supervision.

The case is currently under investigation, with authorities working to determine the motivations and circumstances surrounding the fatal shooting.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

TNI AL Officer Accused: Rental Car Theft or Misunderstanding? Puspomal Speaks Out

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: TNI: One Navy Officer Allegedly Involved in Shooting That Killed Boss of Car Rental

The Chief of Navy Strategic Command, Laksda Sasmita, reveals the roles of three military personnel allegedly involved in a shooting incident at a toll road rest area in Tangerang, which resulted in the death of the car rental boss (48). The incident was captured on CCTV and sparked public outrage.

In a press conference held at the Headquarters of the Joint Regional Command, Jl. Gunung Sahari, Jakarta, on Monday (6/1/2025), Sasmita confirmed that only one navy officer was involved in the shooting, firing twice. The incident occurred outside a mini-market, as seen in the CCTV footage.

"One navy officer was involved in the shooting, which happened outside, not inside. There was chaos at the scene, and one person was attacked after leaving the toilet, leading to the shooting," Sasmita explained.

The three military personnel involved are identified as Sertu AA, Sertu RH, and Kelasi Kepala BA. Two of them are from Kopaska Armada I, while one is from KRI Bontang. Sasmita mentioned that they are colleagues and that their roles in the incident are not clearly defined yet.

Interestingly, the shooter and the victim are related. The shooter, Sertu AA, is the victim’s uncle. "The shooter was the victim’s uncle. He’s the one seen approaching the victim in the CCTV footage," Sasmita added.

At present, there’s no evidence suggesting the involvement of the three military personnel in the car theft. However, further investigations will be conducted if any new evidence surfaces.

The firearm used in the shooting belongs to the navy, used by Sertu AA as an aider-de-camp (ADC). "The gun is an inventory that comes with the job due to AA’s role as an ADC," explained the Commander of the Joint Regional Command, Laksdya TNI Denih Hendrata.

The shooting incident was triggered by the car rental boss trying to retrieve a Toyota Brio that was supposed to be returned but was moved to Tangerang without authorization. The car had been sold to RH and then to AA, a navy personnel, for 40 million IDR after being initially sold by the rental boss’s client to RH for 23 million IDR.

The incident unfolded on Thursday (2/1) when the rental boss and his friends found the car at a toll road rest area and attempted to take it back, leading to a scuffle that ended in the fatal shooting.

wegian, penyelidikan menunjukkan tiga orang itu merupakan rekan. Dia menyebut tiga orang itu tidak memiliki pembagian peran secara jelas dalam kasus ini.

“Dari hasil lidik yang sudah kami laksanakan sampai saat ini kita masuk ke penyidikan. Jadi peran yang tiga orang ini sebenarnya itu adalah rekan. Jadi peran itu tidak ada peran ini oh ini sebagai eksekutor, ini sebagai ini, tidak,” ujarnya.

Dia mengungkapkan pelaku penembakan dengan orang yang dikeroyok dalam video di TKP kejadian juga punya hubungan saudara. Dia menyebut pelaku penembakan adalah paman dari orang yang dikeroyok.

“Bahkan pelaku dengan yang dikeroyok tadi itu adalah saudara. Jadi pelaku ini adalah pamannya, pamannya AA tadi. Yang dalam video yang keluar dari toilet terus dihadang itu adalah paman yang bersangkutan,” ujarnya.

Dia menjelaskan belum ada bukti dugaan keterlibatan tiga anggota TNI ini dalam penggelapan mobil. Menurutnya, hal itu akan diusut lebih lanjut jika ditemukan bukti.

“Jadi peran dalam tindak kejahatan apakah sebagai penadah, apakah sebagai beking dari hasil lidik sementara masih belum ditemukan. Tapi apabila nanti dalam perkembangannya ada unsur-unsur yang bisa membuktikan itu, itu nanti proses penyidikan. Berikan waktu kepada kami lah untuk itu,” ujarnya.

Senjata api yang digunakan dalam penembakan ini adalah inventaris dinas yang digunakan oleh Sertu AA. Senjata itu dipegang oleh AA karena bertugas sebagai ajudan.

“Senjata itu adalah senjata inventaris yang melekat karena jabatan dari AA itu adalah ADC, ajudan, sehingga ketika dia dapat tugas itu sudah SOP senjata itu melekat,” ujar Pangkoarmada RI Laksdya TNI Denih Hendrata.

Sebagai informasi, penembakan ini berawal saat IA dan rekan-rekannya mencari mobil Brio yang disewa oleh AS. Mobil itu dilacak dengan GPS yang masih menyala. Pelacakan dilakukan karena lokasi GPS tak sesuai dengan perjanjian awal penyewaan serta dua dari tiga GPS telah mati.

Ternyata, mobil itu digelapkan. Mobil itu awalnya disewa oleh AS lalu diserahkan ke IH yang kini masih diburu. IH lalu diduga menyiapkan KTP dan KK palsu untuk proses penjualan mobil itu.

Mobil rental tersebut ternyata dijual ke RH seharga Rp 23 juta. RH kemudian menjual mobil itu ke AA yang merupakan prajurit TNI AL seharga Rp 40 juta.

Pada Kamis (2/1), IA dan rekan-rekannya mencari mobil itu dan menemukannya di rest area Km 45 Tol Tangerang. IA dkk mencoba에서의 dan hauteur adalah ‘optional’.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Indonesian Navy Special Forces Unit Involved in Fatal Shooting of Car Rental Boss: Kopaska

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Breaking: Indonesian Navy Admits Involvement of Three Sailors in Rohingya Refugee Boat Shooting

The Indonesian Navy has confirmed that three of its personnel were involved in a violent incident that left a migrant boat captain dead at a rest area on the Tangerang-Merak Toll Road. The sailors, all from elite units, have been detained for investigation.

The admission came from the Commander of the Indonesian Navy (Koarmada RI), Rear Admiral Denih Hendrata, during a press conference at the Koarmada headquarters in Jakarta. Two of the sailors are from the Navy’s elite amphibious troops, known as Kopaska Armada I, while the third is from a TNI AL tanker ship, KRI Bontang.

The sailors identified are Sergeant AA and Sergeant RH from Kopaska, and Petty Officer BA from the KRI Bontang. They are currently being investigated by the Naval Military Police at their headquarters.

The incident, which occurred at the rest area around kilometer 45 of the Tangerang-Merak Toll Road, involved the pogram of migrant boat captain and a shooting that resulted in his death. The Navy’s confirmation sheds light on the ongoing issue of migrant boat intercepts and their treatment by Indonesian authorities.

The public is urged to stay tuned for further developments in this pivotal case.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Judicial Tactics: Preventing Conflict of Interest in Election Dispute Cases

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Courting Impartiality: MK’s Stratgeies to Avoid Conflict of Interest in Election Disputes

As the 2024 regional elections approach, the Constitutional Court (MK) gears up for a potentially heavy docket of election dispute cases. In preparation, Chief Justice Suhartoyo has revealed strategies to ensure impartiality and prevent conflicts of interest among the justices.

The MK has received a total of 314 disputes, predominantly from gubernatorial elections (242 cases) followed by gubernatorial (23 cases) and candidature (49 cases). To manage this caseload, the MK has implemented several measures:

  1. Regulatory Updates: The MK is updating its procedural regulations to streamline the handling of election disputes.
  2. Training and Capacity Building: The court is offering guidance and workshops for all stakeholders involved in election disputes. A "Coaching Clinic" is also planned to enhance the skills of those handling these cases.
  3. Infrastructure Improvement: The MK is modernizing its facilities to accommodate the increased caseload and ensure efficient hearings.

To further mitigate potential conflicts of interest, the MK has instituted a panel system. Each panel consists of three justices, none of whom will adjudicate cases from their home regions. Pan Mohammad Faiz, Head of the Public Relations and Protocol Bureau, confirmed that all registered cases will be divided proportionally among three panels, ensuring no justice has a vested interest in a particular outcome.

In preparation for the upcoming hearings, justices will thoroughly review all registered disputes before the initial hearings begin on January 8, 2025. This proactive approach aims to ensure fairness and impartially in all proceedings.

These strategic measures by the Constitutional Court underscores its commitment to maintaining the integrity of the election process and upholding the rule of law in Indonesia.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"Rare Decision: Supreme Court’s Verdict on Presidential Term Limits and Diverse Reactions"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: MK’s Rare Ruling on Presidential Threshold Sparks Diverse Reactions

Subhead: Mahkamah Konstitusi’s decision to abolish the 20% parliamentary seat threshold for presidential candidates has sparked a range of reactions, with political parties and legal experts weighing in on the significant move.

Article:

In a surprising turn of events, the Constitutional Court (MK) has nullified the 20% parliamentary seat threshold for presidential candidates, a norm that has been in place since 2017. This groundbreaking decision, made public on January 2, 2025, has stirred up a hornet’s nest of reactions from various political parties and legal experts.

The Ruling

The court, led by chief justice Suhartoyo, ruled that Article 222 of Law No. 7/2017 on General Elections, whichmandated the 20% threshold, was inconsistent with the 1945 Constitution. The MK declared the article to be unenforceable, effectively reopening the presidential race to all political parties.

The Petitioners

This historic decision was the result of a judicial review filed by four students from UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta: Enika Maya Oktavia, Rizki Maulana Syafei, Faisal Nasirul Haq, and Tsalis Khoirul Fatna. These law and sharia students successfully argued that the threshold discriminated against smaller political parties and hindered democratic representation.

Reactions from Political Parties

  1. Pancasila Masyarakat (PKB): Potential Controversy

PKB, a political party with a significant presence in parliament, has expressed concern about the potential controversies that may arise from the MK’s decision. Waketum PKB, Jazilul Fawaid, stressed that the ruling would likely spark diverse opinions, debates, and controversies, necessitating further deliberations in parliament and a potential revision of the election law.

  1. Demokrat Party (PDIP): Tighten Presidential Candidate Requirements

PDIP, led by its DPP Chairperson Said Abdullah, welcomed the MK’s decision but aired a different perspective. Instead of focusing on potential controversies, Said proposed tightening the qualifications for presidential candidates. He suggested that a constitutional clerkship, involving various state institutions and social figures, should evaluate candidates’ leadership, experience, knowledge, and integrity.

  1. Partai Amanah Nasional (PAN) and Partai Solidaritas Indonesia (PSI): Respect for the MK’s Decision

Both PAN, chaired by Zulkifli Hasan, and PSI, represented by its deputy chair Andy Budiman, respectfully accepted the MK’s decision. They lauded the court’s role in safeguarding constitutional rights and democracy, emphasizing that the ruling was final and binding.

  1. Partai Buruh: Independent Presidential Candidate

Partai Buruh, while welcoming the MK’s decision, signaled its intention to run an independent presidential candidate in the next election. The party’s Secretary-General, Ferri Nuzarli, expressed gratitude towards the MK and praised the petitioning students for their initiative in challenging the 20% threshold.

Implications

The MK’s ruling has not only reopened political debates and Competition among political parties but has also raised questions about election laws, party coalitions, and presidential qualifications. As discussions continue, one thing is clear: the political landscape in Indonesia is set to become even more dynamic in the run-up to the 2029 presidential election.

Tags: AK Party, MK, Presidential Threshold, 2029 Election, Indonesian Politics

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

PBNU Calls for Involvement in Free Nutritious Meal Provision: We Aim to Contribute

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

PBNU’s Gus Yahya Expresses Interest in Collaborating with Government on Free Nutritious Meal Program

Jakarta — The General Chairman of the Nahdlatul Ulama (PBNU), Yahya Cholil Staquf (Gus Yahya), has expressed his organization’s intention to participate in the government’s free nutritious meal program. Speaking at a gathering with media personnel at PBNU’s headquarters in Central Jakarta, Gus Yahya shared that PBNU is eager to contribute if given the opportunity.

"We hope to be involved in the free nutritious meal program. Of course, we would like to contribute if there’s room for us to do so," said Gus Yahya on Friday (3/1/2025). He added that PBNU sees the involvement of UMKM (Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises) as a strategic avenue for the organization’s efforts.

Gus Yahya revealed that several pesantren (Islamic boarding schools) under PBNU’s purview have been contacted by the government to serve as pilot locations for the program. He noted that the program would be carried out in coordination with the government and PBNU.

"We’re currently in the process of selecting some pesantren to serve as pilot sites for this free nutritious meal program. This will be done under the coordination of the government and PBNU," he explained.

The PBNU chairman also stated that his organization is prepared to contribute to the program once its specific details have been finalized by the government. He emphasized that PBNU is ready to support the initiative led by President Prabowo Subianto.

"We’re currently awaiting the government’s plan for managing this program. When the details are finalized, we hope that PBNU can play a role in contributing to its success," Gus Yahya concluded.

(pan/pan)

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Luthfi-Yasin Officially Registered as Party in Jateng Gubernatorial Election Dispute at Constitutional Court

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Luthfi-Yasin Joins MK Sengketa as Andika-Hendi‘s Pilkada Challenge Continues

Subhead: Gubernatorial hopefuls Ahmad Luthfi-Taj Yasin file as related parties in MK saga, disputing Andika Perkasa-Hendrar Prihadi’s claims.

Article:

In a twist to the ongoing gubernatorial elections in Central Java, Ahmad Luthfi-Taj Yasin (Luthfi-Yasin), the ruling pair with a decisive victory, has joined Andika Perkasa-Hendrar Prihadi (Andika-Hendi) in the legal battle at the Constitutional Court (MK). Luthfi-Yasin, who won the election with a landslide, has now filed as a related party in the MK dispute, challenging Andika-Hendi’s grievances.

Luthfi-Yasin’s legal team, led by Heru Widodo, declared their intention to participate in the MK proceedings, stating, "As the winning pair with an overwhelming lead of over 3.5 million votes, we have a vested interest in providing our perspective and clarifying any misconceptions in the ongoing dispute."

The move comes after Andika Perkasa and Hendrar Prihadi launched a challenge against the Central Java Election Commission’s declaration of results, seeking the disqualification of Luthfi-Yasin. In their petition, Andika-Hendi allege electoral irregularities and unfair practices, a claim refuted by Luthfi-Yasin’s camp.

Widodo, speaking from the MK headquarters in Jakarta, iterated his camp’s stance: "We believe there have been no transgressions from our end. We aim to present facts and rectify any erroneous information circulating among the public. We trust the MK to deliver a fair verdict that will Validators the outcome and uphold the integrity of the elections."

Luthfi-Yasin’s intervention marks a significant development in the Java gubernatorial race, as both parties now square off in the prestigious Constitutional Court. The MK is expected to deliver a verdict that would either uphold the election results or pave the way for a fresh election.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Disciplined: 3 Cops Dismissed, Ethical Hearing Continues

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Three Police Officers Fired as DWP Event Harassment Inquiry Continues

Subhead: Polri cracks down on misconduct, with 3 high-ranking officers dismissed and more disciplinary hearings imminent.

Meta Description: Police in Indonesia, following investigations into the Djakarta Warehouse Project (DWP) event harasses, have dismissed three senior officers. More disciplinary hearings are impending as the probe continues.

Police in Indonesia have taken stern action against several of its own in the wake of harrowing reports of harassment and demands for bribes during the Djakarta Warehouse Project (DWP) event held at JIExpo, Kemayoran, Jakarta Pusat. The National Police (Polri) has dismissed three senior-ranking officers, with more disciplinary hearings scheduled in the coming days.

Policemen Dismissed

The dismissed officers, undergoing the deepest disciplinary action, are:

  1. Kombes Donald Simanjuntak – The head of the Narcotics Crime Directorate at the Metro Jaya regional police. His inaction and ineffective oversight allowed subordinates to harass and exploit DWP attendees.
  2. AKBP Malvino Edward Yusticia – A high-ranking officer within the same directorate. Yusticia was involved in the unlawful detentions and extortion cases that occurred during the event.
  3. AKP Yudhy Triananta Syaeful – A former member of the same directorate. Yudhy’s participation in the harrowing incidents has led to his dismissal.

These three were let go following disciplinary hearings held on December 31, 2024 (Donald and Yudhy) and January 2, 2025 (Malvino).

Polri’s Unyielding Stance

Karopenmas, the chief spokesperson for the National Police, Brigjen Trunoyudo Wisnu Andiko, has clarified that the dismissal of these officers should serve as a stark reminder of the consequences of misconduct. He underscored that the police force will not tolerate any form of misbehavior from its members. Moreover, the National Police has invited external observers from Kompolnas to oversee the proceedings to ensure their transparency and impartiality.

Trunoyudo iterated that Police Chief Jenderal Listyo Sigit Prabowo remains steadfast in his commitment to uphold the integrity of the force by swiftly punishing any transgressions.

On-going Investigations

The disciplinary hearings continue, with the focus now shifting to the roles played by the 3 senior officers. The Sc весьх; surgeries exposed several sketches that commenced during the event. Kombes Donald’s inaction and approval of his subordinates was cited as misconduct, which led to his dismissal. AKP Yudhy, businessman, was linked to demands for bribes during detentions. Similar allegations have emerged against AKBP Malvino.

The police force is currently scrutinizing 18 officers, and 3 have been terminated thus far. More disciplinary actions are expected in the following days, with the list of officers potentially expanding due to recent developments.

Demotion for a Police Officer

Apart from the dismissals, one police officer has received a severe demotion as punishment for their involvement in the case. Kompolnas Choirul Anam confirmed the news of a police official with the initial ‘D’ being demoted by eight ranks, along with a 30-day confined duty. This officer was identified as a significant figure in the case, although specific details on his role remain unclear.

As the probe into the DWP event harassment continues, the National Police reaffirms its commitment to enforcing zero tolerance for misconduct and corruption among its ranks. With more disciplinary hearings scheduled, investigations promise to unearth the full extent of the involved parties’ misdeeds and ensure they face appropriate consequences. The public eagerly awaits more developments in this unfolding story.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

PDIP’s Plan for a Constitutional Coalition After the Presidential Threshold Vanishes

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

PDIP Responds to MK’s Ruling: Proposes Constitutional Engineering via Party Coalition

Following the Constitutional Court’s (MK) decision to abolish the presidential threshold, which required a minimum of 20% of DPR seats or 25% of valid national votes in the previous election for presidential candidates, the opposition Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP) has issued a response.

In compliance with the MK’s ruling, PDIP’s Chairman, Said Abdullah, initially pledged full obedience. However, he also highlighted the MK’s consideration to allow political engineering regarding presidential candidate nominations.

"Regarding this ruling, we, as a political party, fully submit and comply, as the MK’s decision is final and binding," Said told reporters on Thursday (2/1/2025). However, he noted that the MK had instructed the government and the DPR to regulate, through a new law, a system that would prevent an excessive number of presidential candidates, potentially undermining the direct election of the president and vice president by the people.

Said, who also serves as the Chairman of the DPR’s Budget Agency, suggested that the nomination process for presidential candidates and running mates could still involve cooperation or coalition between political parties, with non-parliamentary parties also included, as instructed by the MK.

"All political parties have the right to propose presidential and vice-presidential candidates, not based on their DPR seat or valid national vote percentage, but through cooperation or coalition among parties, as long as it does not lead to party dominance," Said explained. He believes this system can be established through constitutional engineering, as directed by the MK, involving all parties, including those without DPR representation.

PDIP aims to strengthen political support in the DPR for the elected presidential and vice-presidential candidates. According to Said, this can be achieved without compromising each party’s right to nominate presidential and vice-presidential candidates.

"The spirit of our deliberations on Article 222 of the Election Law in the DPR is to solidify political support for the elected presidential and vice-presidential candidates to facilitate their policy agenda, budget, and legislation," Said concluded.

Furthermore, PDIP proposed constitutional engineering to tighten the qualifications for presidential and vice-presidential candidates. According to Said, these qualifications could be evaluated by state institutions or representatives of public figures.

"The MK’s ruling on constitutional engineering can also be carried out by setting qualifications for presidential and vice-presidential candidates, such as leadership, public role experience, knowledge of governance, and integrity record," Said suggested. He proposed that these evaluations be conducted by representatives of state institutions and public figures as part of the qualification process for presidential and vice-presidential candidates.

The MK’s ruling in Case No. 62/PUU-XXI/2023, read out by Chief Justice Suhartoyo on Thursday (2/1/2025), declared that Article 222 of Law No. 7 of 2017 on General Elections, which established the presidential threshold, is inconsistent with the 1945 Constitution and has no legal force. The MK granted all requests in the case.

In its consideration, the MK suggested that the government and the DPR revise the Election Law to regulate the number of presidential and vice-presidential candidates, preventing excessive nominations from undermining the direct election process by the people.

This article is derived from a news report published by Detik and has been edited for clarity and SEO optimization.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Golkar Secretary Shocked by MK’s Proposal to Lower Presidential Threshold to 20%

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Shocking Ruling: Indonesia’s Constitutional Court Abolishes Presidential Threshold for Presidential Candidates

Article:

In a monumental and unexpected decision, Indonesia’s Constitutional Court (MK) has ruled to abolish the presidential threshold, a requirement that had been in place since 2017. This decision is set to significantly alter the political landscape of the world’s fourth most populous country as it heads towards the next presidential election.

The MK, chaired by Suhartoyo, delivered the verdict in a session held at the court’s headquarters in Jakarta on Thursday, January 2, 2025. The ruling addressed Case No. 62/PUU-XXI/2023, granting all of the petitions put forth by the applicants.

The abolished presidential threshold, set at 20% of the total seats in the House of Representatives (DPR) or 25% of the national valid votes in the previous election, was a key requirement for candidates seeking the presidency and vice presidency. The threshold was implemented to ensure that presidential candidates had broad-based support, endeavoring to foster a robust and effective presidential system.

Sarmuji, the Secretary General of the Golkar Party, expressed his surprise at the MK’s decision. "We are startled by this MK ruling, given that their previous 27 rulings on this matter had consistently upheld the presidential threshold," he stated, adding, "Both the MK and the legislation have always agreed that the threshold was necessary to strengthen the presidential system."

The MK’s judgment declared that the provisions of the 2017 Election Law concerning the presidential threshold were unconstitutional, as they contravened the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In effect, this reverses a significant regulatory hurdle that had previously been in place to vet presidential hopefuls.

The removal of the presidential threshold is expected to open up the playing field for the next presidential election, potentially changing the dynamics of Indonesia’s political scene. However, the practical implications and potential challenges that may arise from this decision remain to be seen.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts