International Criminal Court (ICC) chief prosecutor Karim Khan has been suspended from his duties following a referral for disciplinary proceedings over allegations of sexual misconduct. The 56-year-old British barrister, who denies any wrongdoing, faces a potential removal process by the Assembly of States Parties, which requires a majority vote from its 125 member states to finalize his future at the global court.
Why was the ICC prosecutor suspended?
The Bureau of the Assembly of States Parties moved to suspend Karim Khan following a report from the United Nations Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS). According to the Associated Press, the U.N. investigation uncovered evidence of nonconsensual sexual contact involving a female aide at Khan’s office, his private residence, and while on mission. While the OIOS report provided these findings, a three-judge panel tasked with a legal assessment concluded the evidence was not conclusive enough to warrant immediate removal without further deliberation.
The process to address these allegations is unprecedented for the ICC. The Assembly of States Parties has had to repeatedly create new rules to accommodate the investigation into the chief prosecutor.
What is the process for removing an ICC official?
Only the Assembly of States Parties holds the authority to remove the prosecutor from office. This action necessitates a secret ballot where a majority of the 125 member states must vote in favor of the measure. Specifically, 63 countries would need to support the removal to terminate Khan’s tenure. While a date for this special session has not been set, the assembly has stated it will be convened as soon as possible.
How do the allegations against Karim Khan compare to prior investigations?
The current situation is the culmination of a scandal that has persisted for more than two years. According to whistleblower documents cited by the Associated Press, allegations include Khan locking his office door, engaging in unwanted physical contact, and repeatedly asking the aide to accompany him on vacation. This contrasts with earlier administrative handling; when harassment allegations were first brought to the court’s independent watchdog over two years ago, the alleged victim declined to file a formal complaint, leading the body to recommend undisclosed measures rather than a full investigation.
When tracking international legal proceedings, focus on the distinction between internal oversight reports and final judicial assessments. Often, as seen in this case, investigative findings and legal panels may arrive at different conclusions regarding the weight of evidence.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is the suspension a final decision on Karim Khan’s career?
No. The Bureau of the Assembly of States Parties explicitly stated that the suspension pending the assembly meeting is not an indication of the final outcome. - Has Karim Khan responded to the allegations?
Khan has steadfastly denied any wrongdoing throughout the process. His legal team is expected to issue a formal statement regarding the developments. - When did the investigation into these allegations begin?
The allegations were first reported to the court’s independent watchdog more than two years ago, though Khan had already temporarily stepped down in May 2025 to allow for the investigation to proceed.
Are you following the developments at the International Criminal Court? Join the conversation in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for updates on this unfolding legal matter.