Tag:

kejaksaan

News

Bahuri’s Request for Case Reopening, Metro Police Assures Thorough Investigation

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Firli Bahuri’s Lawyer Presses for Pemerasan Case Halting as Evidence Remains Incomplete

FIRLI BAHURI’S LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE URGES TO HALT PERMESANAN CASE DUE TO COMPLETE LACK OF EVIDENCE

JAKARTA – Firli Bahuri, fluent in numerous languages, including Mandarin and Japanese, has requested the cessation of his ongoing case involving alleged threats against former Minister of Agriculture, Syahrul Yasin Limpo (SYL), citing incomplete evidence. The Jakarta Metropolitan Police (Polda Metro Jaya) has affirmed its commitment to conclude the case.

Firli’s lawyer, Ian Iskandar, stated that the case’s evidence files had been repeatedly returned by prosecutors due to incompleteness. Given this, Ian believes police investigators should issue a Suspension of Examination (SP3) as per the Criminal Procedure Code, Article 109(2) of Indonesia’s Criminal Procedure Law Number 8/1981.

"It should be followed up by the investigation team of Polda Metro Jaya by ceasing the investigation and issuing a Suspension of Examination as regulated," Ian explained in an interview on Thursday, January 2, 2025.

Ian revealed that the evidence file for the alleged extortion case has been returned a total of four times, with the last instance occurring on February 2, 2024. Despite this, the investigation team failed to complete and submit the evidence file to the Jakarta Provincial Prosecutor’s Office by November 18, 2024.

Polda Metro Jaya’s Response

Separately, the head of the Criminal Investigation Directorate, Kombes Ade Safri Simanjuntak, assured that the case would be resolved. He indicated that the investigation is being conducted professionally and transparently.

"We assure you that the investigation in this case is being handled professionally and transparently," Ade Safri told reporters.

Ade Safri disclosed that the investigation team is still working on completing the evidence file for the alleged extortion of SYL. The team continues to coordinate with the Jakarta Provincial Prosecutor’s Office regarding the evidence file’s completeness.

"Insha’Allah, we will be able to complete and finalize the case file soon. We are continuously coordinating with the Prosecutorial Office of the Jakarta Provincial Prosecutor’s Office for compliance with P19 instructions," he said.

Additionally, the investigation team has also coordinated with the Anti-Corruption Commission (KPK) regarding the case’s handling. Both Polri and KPK are committed to resolving the case.

"On that occasion, the investigation team also presented the investigation progress made so far, including efforts to comply with P19 instructions, and stated that there are no obstacles in the investigation process and P19 compliance efforts," Ade Safri concluded.

Firli Bahuri is currently facing multiple cases at Polda Metro Jaya, with the primary case involving alleged extortion of SYL. He has been named a suspect in this case, and investigators are also exploring potential money laundering charges (TPPU). Another case involves Firli’s alleged violation of article 36 in conjunction with article 65 of Law Number 30/2002, as amended by Law Number 19/2019, regarding a meeting with parties involved in the case.

Firli has previously filed two pretrial appeals, with the first being rejected and the second withdrawn for completion of the evidence file.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Jakarta’s Cultural Affairs Chief Inactive, Named Suspect in Corruption Case

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Breaking News: Jakarta Anti-Corruption Bureau Names Iwan Henry Wardhana and Two Others as Suspects in Cultural Agency Corruption Case

The Independentunicipal Corruption Eradication Commission (Korini), Jakarta, has named Iwan Henry Wardhana, the former head of the Jakarta Culture Agency, and two others as suspects in a corruption case involving the embezzlement of government funds. The two other suspects are MFM, the acting head of the utilization division, and GAR, a private individual.

"The three suspects are alleged to have conspired to use ghost cultural centers to inflated expense reports for art and culture events, allowing GAR to siphon off funds into their personal accounts," said Syahron Hasibuan, head of the Public Relations Unit of Korini, Jakarta.

In this case, investigators accuse the suspects of violating Articles 2 and 3 of the Corruption Eradication Law (UU Tipikor), read together with Articles 18 and 55 of the Criminal Code (KUHP), and Article 64 of the Criminal Code. MFM and GAR have been taken into custody for 20 days, while Iwan Henry Wardhana’s whereabouts are yet to be determined.

Prior to this, Governor Teguh Setyabudi had earlier revoked Wardhana’s appointment as head of the Jakarta Culture Agency pending the outcome of the corruption investigation. The governer also stated that the Secretary of the Culture Agency would act as the interim head of the agency until further notice.

[End of Article]

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Investigators Must Cease Probe Against Me, Alleges PMJ Under KUHAP Rules

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Ex-KPK Chief Firli Bahuri: Polda Metro Jaya Should Drop Corruption Case Against Me

Jakarta CNN Indonesia — Former Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) chairman Firli Bahuri has stated that the Metropolitan Jaya Regional Police (Polda Metro Jaya) should drop the corruption case against him. According to Firli, the investigation has not met the required standards, with the case file being returned to the prosecutor’s office four times due to material deficiencies.

Firli, a former Commissioner General of Police, revealed that the case file was most recently returned on February 2, 2024. He further explained that the Jakarta Prosecutor’s Office sent a letter to Polda Metro Jaya on March 7, 2024, asking for an update on the case’s progress, as it had exceeded the 14-day investigation period. However, until November 18, 2024, Polda Metro Jaya failed to complete the case file, including following prosecutors’ instructions.

As a result, on November 28, 2024, the Jakarta Prosecutor’s Office returned the Letter of Permission to Commence Investigation (SPDP) to Polda Metro Jaya, a decision confirmed in a preliminary court filing by the Legal Aid Institute (MAKI).

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Judge Overrules: Eko Aryanto’s 6.5-Year Sentence for Harvey Moeis

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
Indonesian Judge Facing Scrutiny Over ‘lenient’ Sentence; His Luxury Vehicles Raise Eyebrows

Subhead:
Chief Judge Eko Aryanto’s decision to sentence corrupt official Harvey Moeis to 6.5 years sparks debate, while his lavish car collection garners attention.

Article:

metted in the spotlight for imposing a 6.5-year jail term on Harvey Moeis, a convict in a high-profile corruption case involving the mismanagement of tin commodity trading, which reportedly caused the state to lose Rp 300 trillion. But the public’s curiosity extends beyond the controversial sentencing to the judge’s personal wealth and assets, as highlighted by a recent Laporan Harta Kekayaan Penyelenggara Negara (LHKPN).

Judge Eko Aryanto declared a total net worth of Rp 2.820.981.000 in his 2023 LHKPN report, with his most valuable asset being land and buildings worth Rp 1.350.000.000. This was followed by other non-business assets worth Rp 395.000.000 and cash and cash equivalents valued at Rp 165.981.000.

Of particular interest is the judge’s collection of vehicles and machinery, estimated at Rp 910.000.000. Here’s a breakdown:

  1. Honda CR-V Minibus (2013) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 300.000.000
  2. Honda Civic Sedan (2013) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 300.000.000
  3. Kawasaki Ninja Motorcycle (2013) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 50.000.000
  4. Kawasaki KLX Motorcycle (2013) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 20.000.000
  5. Toyota Innova Reborn G 2.0 AT (2016) – Purchased personally, valued at Rp 240.000.000

Earlier reports indicate that Judge Eko Aryanto imposed a lighter sentence than what prosecutors sought due to differing opinions on Harvey Moeis’ role in the corruption case. The judge noted that Moeis did not play a significant part in the case, despite the prosecution’s demand for a 12-year imprisonment.

"The panel of judges found that the prosecution’s demand of 12 years was too heavy given the defendant’s involvement in the case," Aryanto stated while reading the verdict at the Jakarta Corruption Court on Bungur Raya Street, according to detikNews.

Moeis, who represented PT Refined Bangka Tin (RBT), was found guilty of benefiting from illegaltimah mining activities alongside PT Timah, the state-owned miner. However, Judge Aryanto ruled that Moeis was not involved in decision-making nor aware of the financial aspect of their collaboration.

The judge’s wealth declaration and luxury vehicles have sparked public interest, with some questioning the judge’s lifestyle and lavish spending. While it’s essential to maintain the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, such public scrutiny may add pressure on the judiciary to uphold the highest standards of integrity and impartiality.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Gamma Family Coordinates with Experts to Report General Irwan to Propam

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Family of SMK Student Fatally Shot by Police Considers Legal Action Against Officer as He’s Transferred

Subhead: Relatives of Gamma Rizkynata Oktafandy, the 17-year-old SMK student killed by a police officer in Semarang, Jawa Tengah, are weighing legal options against Kombes Pol Irwan, the former head of Semarang’s Police Resort, who has been transferred to the Police Education and Training Center (STIK) in Jakarta.

Article:

Jakarta, CNN Indonesia — The family of Gamma Rizkynata Oktafandy, the teenager killed by a police officer in Semarang, Jawa Tengah, is considering taking legal action against Kombes Pol Irwan, who was recently transferred from his position as the head of Semarang’s Police Resort to the Police Education and Training Center (STIK) in Jakarta.

Irwan has been embroiled in controversy since the incident in November, where a police officer, Aipda Robig Zainudin, shot and killed Gamma during a confrontation. Irwan, as the then-head of Semarang’s Police Resort, issued a statement claiming that Robig had fired in self-defense after being threatened with a sharp weapon during an attempt to disperse a street brawl.

However, Irwan’s version of events has been disputed. The family of Gamma, represented by Zaenal Abidin ‘Petir’, has questioned Irwan’s account, arguing that the officer’s actions were not justified. They have since demanded that Irwan be removed from his position, citing a lack of professionalism and potential corruption of the investigation.

The family is now considering filing a complaint against Irwan with the Police Professional Ethics Commission (Propam) at the National Police Headquarters (Mabes Polri). "We’re still gathering information from experts to confirm if Irwan’s statements can indeed be reported," said Subambang, the family’s spokesperson and Gamma’s grandfather. "We need to be careful not to make any mistakes."

The family’s lawyer, Zaenal, has welcomed Irwan’s transfer but has also called for a review of the former officer’s actions. "Polri should evaluate Irwan’s decision to try and ‘protect’ Robig after he fatally shot Gamma and his friends," he said. Zaenal also criticized Irwan’s visit to Gamma’s family shortly after the teenager’s death, suggesting it was an attempt to hush up the matter.

The family maintains that Irwan should not be allowed to hold a similar position in the future. "It’s only right that he’s no longer the head of Semarang’s Police Resort," said Zaenal. "But we’ll still report him to Propam for not conducting a transparent investigation into Gamma’s case."

However, the public relations department of the Jawa Tengah Police has denied that Irwan’s transfer is a result of the incident. Kombes Artanto, the department’s head, stated that the transfer is a routine rotation within the police force.

The officer who shot Gamma, Aipda Robig Zainudin, has been dismissed from the police force and is currently facing legal charges for murder and assault causing death, as filed by Gamma’s family. The investigation into the case is ongoing.

In a recent hearing with the DPR’s Commission III, Irwan expressed his condolences to Gamma’s family and the people of Semarang, stating that he was prepared to face any consequences for his actions. However, his apology has done little to appease the family, who continue to seek justice for Gamma’s death.

Article Tags: Polisi Tembak Siswa SMK, Semarang, Irwan, Propam, Mabes Polri, Zaenal ‘Petir’, Aipda Robig Zainudin, Robig

Word Count: approximately 600 words

SEO Keywords: Polisi Tembak Siswa SMK, Semarang, Irwan, Propam, Mabes Polri, Zaenal ‘Petir’, Aipda Robig Zainudin, Robig

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Aid in $300 T Timah Corruption Scandal

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
Corruption Scandal: Activist Frowns on Court’s Decision, Demands Return of Seized Assets from Helena Lim

Subhead:
Anti-Corruption Activist Disagrees with Court Verdict, Pressures Prosecutors to Appeal

Byline:
Lirang Brata, Jakarta

Article:

In a surprising turn of events, the Masyarakat Anti Korupsi Indonesia (MAKI) has expressed its displeasure with the court’s decision to return seized assets to Helena Lim, a money changer and businesswoman accused of participating in a multi-billion-dollar corruption scheme involving the trade of tin. The activist group is urging prosecutors to appeal the verdict, which it believes is lenient given the magnitude of the alleged crime.

MAKI’s coordinator, Boyamin Saiman, told reporters, "I was let down by the court’s decision to return Helena Lim’s assets. I urge the Attorney General’s Office to file an appeal and insist on the seizure of her wealth to make up for the Rp 300 trillion loss to the state."

In its verdict, the court ruled that Helena Lim must pay a Rp 900 million fine as damages for her role in the corruption case that benefited Harvey Moeis. Boyamin contests this, highlighting the disparity between the damages assigned to each defendant. "It’s confusing, to say the least. Harvey Moeis was initially accused of causing Rp 420 billion in losses, but the damages assigned to him in this latest verdict amount to only Rp 210 billion," he said, questioning where the remaining funds went.

Boyamin maintains that Helena Lim, who has been convicted of corruption and money-laundering, should have her assets seized to compensate for the losses incurred by the state. "Given her involvement in the corruption case and the fact that her wealth is suspected to be the proceeds of her illegal activities, her assets should be seized and forfeited to the state," he stated.

The activistgroup is calling for a fair and just legal process, underscoring the enormous losses suffered by the state due to Helena Lim’s alleged role in the illegal tin trading scheme. "Helena Lim’s conviction should serve as an example, and her assets should be seized to help recover the Rp 27 trillion in damages caused to the state," Boyamin stressed.

Moreover, MAKI has urged the government to continue investigating the case and consider declaring entrepreneur Robert Bonosusatya (RBS) a suspect in connection with the illegal tin trading scandal.

In a separate development, Helena Lim was sentenced to five years in prison for her role in the corruption case. The court also handed down a Rp 750 million fine, subsided by an additional six months of imprisonment, and ordered her to pay Rp 900 million in damages.

*}

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"Harvey Moeis Sentenced to 6.5 Years in Prison for IM57+ Fraud, Under Certain Conditions"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Jakartan Businessman Harvey Moeis Sentenced to 6.5 Years for Multi-Billion Dollar Corruption Case

In a decision that has left many questioning its fairness, businessman Harvey Moeis was sentenced to 6.5 years in prison for his role in a corruption case involving the trading of tin commodities. The verdict, handed down by a panel of judges, comes despite the staggering Rp 300 trillion (approximately USD 2.1 billion) in state losses attributed to the scandal.

IM57+ Lakso Anindito, a prominent figure in the anti-corruption movement, expressed his astonishment at the leniency shown to Moeis. "The sentence is not in line with public expectations of justice as Moeis has not actively contributed to fully exposing the scandal," he told detikcom on Saturday, December 28, 2024.

Anindito argued that Moeis’ sentence could only be understood if he had proactively worked to completely unravel the case, including identifying the ultimate beneficiaries of the corruption.

The judges, in their ruling, deemed the prosecution’s 12-year demand excessive for Moeis, whom they viewed as having a limited role in the affair. Moeis was not formally listed as a commissioner, director, or shareholder of PT RBT, the company at the center of the scandal. However, they also emphasized that Moeis’ ability to act as a representative of the company’s management made him a pivotal figure in potentially uncovering the full extent of the corruption.

Moeis’ 6-year, 6-month sentence includes a fine of Rp 1 billion, which, if unpaid, would add an additional 6 months to his jail term. He has also been ordered to pay Rp 210 billion in compensation. Failure to do so could result in his assets being seized and auctioned off to cover the debt, with any additional amount converted into a further 2-year prison sentence.

The corruption case involving Moeis and others has resulted in unprecedented state losses and has drawn widespread public scrutiny. Anindito lamented that the leniency shown to Moeis could set a dangerous precedent for future corruption cases, stating that it undermines the efforts to achieve justice and comprehensive disclosure of such scandals.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
World

"Revealed: South Korean President Authorizes Lethal Force During Martial Law"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
South Korean President Allows Military to Use Force to Enter Parliament Amid Failed Emergency Measures Attempt

Article:

In a disturbing turn of events, the ousted President of South Korea, Yoon Suk Yeol, authorized the military to use force, including firing their weapons, to enter the National Assembly if necessary. This revelation was uncovered in a prosecutor’s report viewed by the AFP news agency on Saturday, December 28.

The 10-page summary of the indictment against former Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun, made available to the media, also disclosed that Yoon had pledged to declare martial law three times if required, as early as December 3. Yoon was impeached by the legislature earlier this month and is currently under investigation for his attempts to topple the civilian government, leading the country into political chaos and ultimately resulting in his removal from office.

Yoon’s lawyer, Yoon Kab-keun, rejected the prosecutors’ report, stating that it was "a one-sided report that does not reflect the objective facts or common sense."

On December 3, as lawmakers rushed to the parliament to reject Yoon’s martial law declaration, heavily armed troops stormed the building, climbing fences, breaking windows, and landing via helicopter. According to the indictment report, Yoon instructed the commander of the defense headquarters in Seoul, Lee Jin-woo, that soldiers could open fire if necessary to enter the National Assembly.

"Haven’t you entered yet? What are you doing? Break in and drag them out, even if you have to shoot," Yoon reportedly told Lee, according to the prosecution’s report.

Watch: President Yoon Unseated, South Korea’s Ruling Party Leader Steps Down

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"Why a 6.5-Year Sentence for Rp 300T Loss in a Proven Deficit Nation"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Baliore IV Judges Sentence Harvey Moeis to 6.5 Years for Timah Corruption, Despite State Loss of Rp 300 Trillion

Subhead: Businessman’s Role Deemed Less Significant, Sparking Disagreement Between Judges and Prosecutors

Article:

In a case that has sent shockwaves through Indonesia’s mining industry, judges from the Jakarta Corruption Court (Tipikor) have sentenced businessman Harvey Moeis to 6.5 years imprisonment for his role in a Rp 300 trillion (USD 2.17 billion) state loss from irregularities in tin ore trading. The verdict has raised eyebrows, given the prosecutors’ demand for a 12-year jail term.

The sharp disagreement between the judges and prosecutors centers around Moeis’ role in the scandal. The primary dispute lies in his involvement, with judges arguing that Moeis’ role was not as significant as prosecutors claimed.

Chief Judge Eko Aryanto justified the lighter sentence, stating, "Majelis hakim considers the prosecution’s demand for 12 years too heavy, given Harvey Moeis’ role as outlined in the case chronology." The ruling was delivered at the Jakarta Tipikor Court on Monday (23/12).

Moeis, representing PT Refined Bangka Tin (RBT), was found to have attended meetings with PT Timah but held no decision-making powers or direct involvement in either company’s management or finance. The judges recognized Moeis’ role as that of a helper to his friend, RBT’s Director Utama Suparta, who was also found guilty in the case.

The Judges acknowledged that both PT Timah and PT RBT possessed valid mining licenses and were not responsible for illegal mining. Instead, they attributed the illegal mining activities to local residents, numbering in the thousands.

Despite the state’s monumental loss of Rp 300 trillion, the judges maintained that the corruption ring involved multiple culprits, not just Moeis. The total loss includes Rp 2.2 trillion from illegal processing fees, Rp 26.6 trillion from purchases of illegal tin ore, and Rp 271 trillion from environmental damages.

While Moeis’ sentence fell short of the prosecutor’s demands, it serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing battle against corruption in Indonesia’s lucrative mining sector. As investigations into the wider corruption network continue, the public eagerly awaits further developments in this high-stakes case.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Prosecutor Criticizes 6.5-Year Sentence for Bui Harvey Moeis: Too Lenient!

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Jakarta – Justice Served, But Critics Seek Harsher Punishment in $300B Timah Corruption Case

The Attorney General’s Office (AGO) has filed an appeal against the verdict issued to business tycoon Harvey Moeis and four other defendants, arguing that the sentencing was too lenient in a massive corruption case involving state-owned mining company PT Timah Tbk.

Harvey Moeis, along with Suwito Gunawan, Robert Indiarto, Reza Andriansyah, and Suparta, were convicted for their role in a $300 billion corruption case involving the illegal trading of tungsten ore, a byproduct of tin mining, between 2015 and 2022.

"The reason for the appeal is that the sentences given to the five defendants were too mild," said Sutikno, Director of Special Crimes Division at the AGO. "There’s an imbalance in the sentencing, with the punishments not reflecting the severity of their crimes."

The AGO believes that the court failed to consider the broader impact of the defendants’ actions on society, particularly in the Bangka Belitung Islands, where the illegal activities occurred.

Harvey Moeis, the mastermind behind the scheme, was initially sentenced to six years and six months in prison. However, the prosecution had sought a 12-year prison term. Other defendants received sentences ranging from five to eight years, considerably lower than the prosecution’s demands.

"I believe the court only considered the personal roles of the defendants in this case, but they failed to factor in the significant damage caused to the community and the state," Sutikno said in an interview with reporters.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts