Tag:

mahkamah konstitusi

News

Judicial Tactics: Preventing Conflict of Interest in Election Dispute Cases

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Courting Impartiality: MK’s Stratgeies to Avoid Conflict of Interest in Election Disputes

As the 2024 regional elections approach, the Constitutional Court (MK) gears up for a potentially heavy docket of election dispute cases. In preparation, Chief Justice Suhartoyo has revealed strategies to ensure impartiality and prevent conflicts of interest among the justices.

The MK has received a total of 314 disputes, predominantly from gubernatorial elections (242 cases) followed by gubernatorial (23 cases) and candidature (49 cases). To manage this caseload, the MK has implemented several measures:

  1. Regulatory Updates: The MK is updating its procedural regulations to streamline the handling of election disputes.
  2. Training and Capacity Building: The court is offering guidance and workshops for all stakeholders involved in election disputes. A "Coaching Clinic" is also planned to enhance the skills of those handling these cases.
  3. Infrastructure Improvement: The MK is modernizing its facilities to accommodate the increased caseload and ensure efficient hearings.

To further mitigate potential conflicts of interest, the MK has instituted a panel system. Each panel consists of three justices, none of whom will adjudicate cases from their home regions. Pan Mohammad Faiz, Head of the Public Relations and Protocol Bureau, confirmed that all registered cases will be divided proportionally among three panels, ensuring no justice has a vested interest in a particular outcome.

In preparation for the upcoming hearings, justices will thoroughly review all registered disputes before the initial hearings begin on January 8, 2025. This proactive approach aims to ensure fairness and impartially in all proceedings.

These strategic measures by the Constitutional Court underscores its commitment to maintaining the integrity of the election process and upholding the rule of law in Indonesia.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Gen Z’s Unorthodox Tactics Upend Elite Plans in Regional and Presidential Elections

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Title: Gen-Z Students‘ Legal Activism Garners Praise for Safeguarding Inauguration: Who's Who?</strong></p>”>Indonesian Democracy

In a significant turn of events, the legal activism of several students has earned widespread commendation for helping to prevent elitist political schemas in the upcoming 2024 regional elections and presidential election. These students, hailing from various universities and primarily belonging to Generation Z, have made history through their persistent pursuit of justice.

Dr. Titi Anggraini, a law lecturer at the University of Indonesia (UI) specializing in election law, has lauded the efforts of these students. Four students from UIN Sunan Kalijaga (Suka) Yogyakarta—Enika Maya Oktavia, Rizki Maulana Syafei, Faisal Nasirul Haq, and Tsalis Khoriul Fatna—filed a petition with the Constitutional Court (MK) challenging the presidential threshold, which was subsequently struck down as unconstitutional in a landmark decision (Nomor.62/PUU-XXII/2024).

Additionally, two UI students—.worked indirectly to prevent the acceleration of simultaneous regional elections in 2024, maintaining the original date of November 14, 2024. Moreover, a student from UIN Jakarta, A. Fahrur Rozi, successfully argued before the MK that the age requirement for regional heads should be based on the nomination stage, not the inauguration, as previously ruled by the Mahkamah Agung (MA).

These efforts, Dr. Anggraini noted, have not only shaped Indonesia’s legal landscape but also inspired hope for the future of the country’s democracy. "History is made by many of our Gen-Z, though not all get the spotlight. Our hope for Indonesia lies in them; we must protect and nurture their spirit."

Praise for these students also came from Anies Baswedan, former Governor of DKI Jakarta and presidential candidate in the last election. He lauded the students for "strengthening, not undermining, Indonesia’s democracy," adding that they offered "hope for Indonesia’s democratic future."

The Pusat Studi Hukum Konstitusi (PSHK) of the University of Islam Indonesia (UII) also heaped praise on the students and theMK for their courageous decision. Retno Widiastuti, a researcher at PSHK, commended the students for their "jihad konstitusional" and the MK for being the "guardian of the constitution and democracy."

Ex-MK Chief Jimly Asshiddiqie also welcomed the MK’s decision, hoping it would brighten the future of Indonesia’s democracy. "Finally, MK has abolished the 20% presidential threshold for the 2029 election. This is a New Year’s gift that brightens the future of our democracy."

These students’ efforts serve as a reminder of the crucial role young people play in shaping and safeguarding democracy. Their activism underscores the principle that every citizen has the power to influence and change the course of history. As the country looks towards the 2024 elections and beyond, the actions of these students serve as an inspiration for all Indonesians to actively participate in the democratic process.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

7 Key Players in the Indonesian Presidential Election Threshold: From Bahlil to PDIP, and Jokowi

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
MK Abolishes 20% Presidential Threshold: Immediate Reactions and Implications

Subhead:
Constitutional Court strikes down presidential threshold, impacting 2024 elections and beyond

Byline:
CNN Indonesia

Body:

The Constitutional Court (MK) has officially annulled the 20% presidential threshold for the 2024 elections, stating that it contradicts the Constitution. The MK handed down its decision today, nullifying Article 222 of the Election Law that required presidential candidates to be backed by political parties holding at least 20% of seats in the House of Representatives (DPR) or receiving 25% of the national vote in the previous legislative elections.

Parallax Ad Break

Reactions from Political Parties and Key Figures:

  1. PDIP

    • Ganjar Pranowo, PDIP’s chairperson, has called on all political parties to prepare for the change in regulations following the MK’s decision.
    • Dolfie Othniel Fredric Palit, secretary of PDIP’s DPR faction, urged the DPR and the government to reconvene and revise the election law promptly.

  2. Golkar

    • Bahlil Lahadalia, Golkar’s chairman, expressed respect for the MK’s decision but emphasized the importance of maintaining the strength of the presidential system.

  3. NasDem

    • Irma Suryani Chaniago, NasDem’s chairperson, deemed the MK’s decision risky, as it was based on a lawsuit filed by a few individuals rather than broad public participation.

  4. Yusril Ihza Mahendra (Minister of Law and Human Rights)

    • The minister praised the MK’s decision, stating that all parties must respect and comply with the court’s final and binding verdict.

  5. Mahfud MD (Former Minister of Defense and former MK Chief Justice)

    • Mahfud welcomed the MK’s judgment, viewing it as a landmark decision that could deter the misuse of the threshold to disenfranchise voters and political parties.

  6. PKB

    • Jazilul Fawaid, PKB’s deputy chairperson, described the MK’s decision as a New Year’s gift and expressed confidence that the MK, DPR, and government could address the repercussions collectively.
  7. President Joko Widodo
    • The President called on all parties to respect and comply with the MK’s final and binding decision, acknowledging that the ruling may lead to a surge in presidential candidates in the upcoming elections.

Implications and Next Steps:

The abolition of the presidential threshold raises several questions and potential challenges, including the need for a potential revision of the election law and the alteration of the political landscape for the 2024 elections and beyond. All stakeholders, including political parties, the DPR, the government, and election monitoring bodies, must now collaborate to navigate the implications of this significant judicial decision.

tags: Indonesian Politics; Constitutional Court; Presidential Election; Election Law

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"Rare Decision: Supreme Court’s Verdict on Presidential Term Limits and Diverse Reactions"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: MK’s Rare Ruling on Presidential Threshold Sparks Diverse Reactions

Subhead: Mahkamah Konstitusi’s decision to abolish the 20% parliamentary seat threshold for presidential candidates has sparked a range of reactions, with political parties and legal experts weighing in on the significant move.

Article:

In a surprising turn of events, the Constitutional Court (MK) has nullified the 20% parliamentary seat threshold for presidential candidates, a norm that has been in place since 2017. This groundbreaking decision, made public on January 2, 2025, has stirred up a hornet’s nest of reactions from various political parties and legal experts.

The Ruling

The court, led by chief justice Suhartoyo, ruled that Article 222 of Law No. 7/2017 on General Elections, whichmandated the 20% threshold, was inconsistent with the 1945 Constitution. The MK declared the article to be unenforceable, effectively reopening the presidential race to all political parties.

The Petitioners

This historic decision was the result of a judicial review filed by four students from UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta: Enika Maya Oktavia, Rizki Maulana Syafei, Faisal Nasirul Haq, and Tsalis Khoirul Fatna. These law and sharia students successfully argued that the threshold discriminated against smaller political parties and hindered democratic representation.

Reactions from Political Parties

  1. Pancasila Masyarakat (PKB): Potential Controversy

PKB, a political party with a significant presence in parliament, has expressed concern about the potential controversies that may arise from the MK’s decision. Waketum PKB, Jazilul Fawaid, stressed that the ruling would likely spark diverse opinions, debates, and controversies, necessitating further deliberations in parliament and a potential revision of the election law.

  1. Demokrat Party (PDIP): Tighten Presidential Candidate Requirements

PDIP, led by its DPP Chairperson Said Abdullah, welcomed the MK’s decision but aired a different perspective. Instead of focusing on potential controversies, Said proposed tightening the qualifications for presidential candidates. He suggested that a constitutional clerkship, involving various state institutions and social figures, should evaluate candidates’ leadership, experience, knowledge, and integrity.

  1. Partai Amanah Nasional (PAN) and Partai Solidaritas Indonesia (PSI): Respect for the MK’s Decision

Both PAN, chaired by Zulkifli Hasan, and PSI, represented by its deputy chair Andy Budiman, respectfully accepted the MK’s decision. They lauded the court’s role in safeguarding constitutional rights and democracy, emphasizing that the ruling was final and binding.

  1. Partai Buruh: Independent Presidential Candidate

Partai Buruh, while welcoming the MK’s decision, signaled its intention to run an independent presidential candidate in the next election. The party’s Secretary-General, Ferri Nuzarli, expressed gratitude towards the MK and praised the petitioning students for their initiative in challenging the 20% threshold.

Implications

The MK’s ruling has not only reopened political debates and Competition among political parties but has also raised questions about election laws, party coalitions, and presidential qualifications. As discussions continue, one thing is clear: the political landscape in Indonesia is set to become even more dynamic in the run-up to the 2029 presidential election.

Tags: AK Party, MK, Presidential Threshold, 2029 Election, Indonesian Politics

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

President Jokowi Addresses the 20% Threshold Elimination: A Video Exclusive

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

President Jokowi Responds to the Elimination of the 20% Election Threshold

Indonesian President Joko Widodo, commonly known as Jokowi, has addressed the Constitutional Court‘s (MK) decision to abolish the 20% electoral threshold for presidential candidates. In a video released by 20Detik, the president expressed his understanding and respect for the court’s ruling, stating, "We will respect the MK’s decision and move forward from there."

The MK’s recent decision to strike down the controversial 20% threshold has left political parties grappling with its implications. The threshold was implemented to prevent mushrooming political parties and to ensure that only parties with substantial support could compete in elections.

However, critics argued that it restricted democracy by preventing smaller parties from participating and forming coalitions. The MK’s verdict has now opened up the political landscape, potentially allowing for a more diverse range of political voices to emerge.

PAN Stands Firm with Prabowo Despite MK Ruling

Amidst the MK’s decision, the National awakening Party (Partai Nasionalis Demokrat – PAN) has reaffirmed its commitment to Prabowo Subianto, the presidential candidate it backed in the 2019 election. Despite the threshold’s elimination, PAN’s deputy chairman, Yandri Susanto, reassured that the party would "remain loyal and continue to support Prabowo."

This declaration comes as a signal that PAN is not planning to switch allegiance in the upcoming 2024 presidential election. However, political analysts are watching the situation closely, as the court’s ruling could potentially encourage mergers and realignments among political parties.

Constitutional Threshold Challenge

The MK’s decision to scrap the 20% electoral threshold is a significant development in Indonesia’s democracy. The ruling was made following a judicial review that challenged the constitutionalpatibility of the threshold, which was introduced by the Electoral Reform Law.

The Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK), Indonesia’s highest constitutional court, ruled that the threshold infringed upon citizens’ fundamental rights to participate in political activities and form associations, as guaranteed by the constitution.

Post-Threshold Political Landscape

With the 20% threshold abolished, political parties are now free to form coalitions without the need to reach the previous threshold. One party that stands to benefit from this is the Labour Party (Partai Buruh), which plans to nominate its own presidential candidate for the 2029 election. Party leader Parto Wigodo has stated that the party will put forward its own candidate, believing that it has the potential to win the presidency.

The political scene is now in a state of flux, with parties weighing the pros and cons of the MK’s decision and strategizing for the future elections. As Indonesia grapples with these developments, the international community watches with interest, eager to see how the country’s democracy will evolve in the coming years.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Luthfi-Yasin Officially Registered as Party in Jateng Gubernatorial Election Dispute at Constitutional Court

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Luthfi-Yasin Joins MK Sengketa as Andika-Hendi‘s Pilkada Challenge Continues

Subhead: Gubernatorial hopefuls Ahmad Luthfi-Taj Yasin file as related parties in MK saga, disputing Andika Perkasa-Hendrar Prihadi’s claims.

Article:

In a twist to the ongoing gubernatorial elections in Central Java, Ahmad Luthfi-Taj Yasin (Luthfi-Yasin), the ruling pair with a decisive victory, has joined Andika Perkasa-Hendrar Prihadi (Andika-Hendi) in the legal battle at the Constitutional Court (MK). Luthfi-Yasin, who won the election with a landslide, has now filed as a related party in the MK dispute, challenging Andika-Hendi’s grievances.

Luthfi-Yasin’s legal team, led by Heru Widodo, declared their intention to participate in the MK proceedings, stating, "As the winning pair with an overwhelming lead of over 3.5 million votes, we have a vested interest in providing our perspective and clarifying any misconceptions in the ongoing dispute."

The move comes after Andika Perkasa and Hendrar Prihadi launched a challenge against the Central Java Election Commission’s declaration of results, seeking the disqualification of Luthfi-Yasin. In their petition, Andika-Hendi allege electoral irregularities and unfair practices, a claim refuted by Luthfi-Yasin’s camp.

Widodo, speaking from the MK headquarters in Jakarta, iterated his camp’s stance: "We believe there have been no transgressions from our end. We aim to present facts and rectify any erroneous information circulating among the public. We trust the MK to deliver a fair verdict that will Validators the outcome and uphold the integrity of the elections."

Luthfi-Yasin’s intervention marks a significant development in the Java gubernatorial race, as both parties now square off in the prestigious Constitutional Court. The MK is expected to deliver a verdict that would either uphold the election results or pave the way for a fresh election.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"Historic Shift: Indonesia’s MK Eliminates Presidential Threshold and Its Potential Impact on the Republic"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Indonesia‘s Mahkamah Konstitusi Abolishes Presidential Threshold for Polls: More Candidates Expected in 2029

Article:

The Constitutional Court (MK) of Indonesia has struck down the presidential threshold, a requirement that presidential candidates must secure at least 20% of the seats in the House of Representatives (DPR) or 25% of the national valid votes in the previous legislative election to be eligible. This decision is set to increase the number of presidential hopefuls in the 2029 election.

In a ruling on case 62/PUU-XXI/2023 delivered on January 2, 2025, the MK, led by its chief Suhartoyo, abolished the threshold, citing that it contradicts the 1945 Indonesian Constitution and lacks legal binding power. The MK granted all demands from the petitioners – four lawyers from the Syariah and Law Faculty of UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

The presidential threshold, introduced in the 2017 Election Law, was aimed at ensuring that only larger parties could nominate presidential candidates. However, the petitioners argued that it violated the "one man one vote one value" principle by creating disparities in the weight of votes.

The MK agreed, stating that the value of votes should be determined within each election period. The presidential threshold, currently set at 20% of DPR seats or 25% of national valid votes, extends its influence across two election periods, potentially distorting democratic representation.

This ruling comes after a series of other cases challenging the constitutionality of the presidential threshold. These include case 129/PUU-XXI/2023, filed by Gugum Ridho Putra, case 87/PUU-XXII/2024, involving four lecturers, and case 101/PUU-XXII/2024, submitted by the Netgrit democracy activist and transparency foundation, represented by Hadar Nafis Gumay and Titi Anggraini.

The MK’s decision indicates that the presidential threshold contravenes political rights, popular sovereignty, and moral, rational, and highly intolerable unfairness principles cherished by the 1945 Constitution. Henceforth, presidential and vice-presidential candidates can be nominated by political parties or coalitions regardless of their seat or vote share in previous elections.

Eliminating the presidential threshold may open the door to as many as 30 presidential and vice-presidential pairs, says MK deputy chief Saldi Isra.

The presidential threshold was initially introduced as an additional regulation to strengthen the presidential system. It first appeared in the 2003 Law on the Election of the President and Vice President, with a threshold of 15% of DPR seats or 20% of national valid votes. This was subsequently raised to 25% of DPR seats or 20% of national valid votes in the 2008 Law. The current threshold was set in the 2017 Election Law.

With the MK’s decision, political parties and coalitions can now nominate more diverse presidential candidates, fostering greater choice and inclusivity in Indonesian democracy. This ruling is expected to shape the presidential landscape in the upcoming 2029 election.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Revised Title: "The Shifting Presidential Threshold: A New Challenge for the Constitutional Court"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Title: A Significant Shift: Mahkamah Konstitusi’s Decision on Presidential Threshold

Article:

In a surprising turn of events, the Constitutional Court (MK) has recently made a decision that differs from its past rulings regarding the presidential threshold. This threshold, known as the minimum 20% requirement for presidential candidates, has been a contentious issue for years.

The presidential threshold, as outlined in Article 222 of the 2017 Election Law, mandates that a presidential candidate must be nominated by a political party or a coalition of political parties that has secured at least 20% of parliamentary seats or 25% of the national vote in the previous legislative election.

Numerous attempts have been made to overturn this rule, with various arguments, but these efforts have been consistently rejected by the MK. However, the recent decision in early 2025 has altered this trajectory.

A Long History of Rejections

The MK has heard 36 cases challenging the presidential threshold since 2017. The earliest cases, such as those in 2017 and 2018, argued that the threshold favors established parties and discourages new ones, violating the constitutional right to equality. Another argument posited that the threshold is unconstitutional as it was not mandated by the 1945 Constitution.

Prominent figures like Rizal Ramli also joined these challenges. In 2020, Ramli argued that the threshold denied certain parties the right to nominate presidential candidates, violating their constitutional rights. Despite these efforts, the MK consistently dismissed these challenges.

A Turning Point in 2025

In early 2025, the MK, chaired by Suhartoyo, delivered a unexpected verdict in the case of No. 62/PUU-XXI/2023. The court struck down the presidential threshold, declaring it unconstitutional.

The MK reasoned that the threshold did not effectively simplify the number of participating parties in elections. Moreover, it benefitted larger parties with seats in the House of Representatives, potentially creating a conflict of interest.

"Democracy Thrives with More Options"

Wakil Ketua MK, Saldi Isra, went on to explain that maintaining the threshold could lead to a two-candidate system, which might polarize the electorate. He urged the government and the House of Representatives to revise the 2017 Election Law to eliminate the threshold and implement sanctions for parties that fail to nominate presidential candidates.

"Dissenting Voices"

While the majority of the MK agreed with the decision, two justices—Anwar Usman and Daniel Yusmic P Foekh—presented dissenting opinions. They argued that the MK had previously confirmed that only political parties participating in the election could challenge the presidential threshold, and that the threshold did not violate any constitutional rights.

Despite these dissenting voices, the MK’s decision marks a significant shift in the electoral landscape, potentially opening the door to a more diverse range of presidential candidates in future elections. (rdp/lir)

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

PDIP’s Plan for a Constitutional Coalition After the Presidential Threshold Vanishes

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

PDIP Responds to MK’s Ruling: Proposes Constitutional Engineering via Party Coalition

Following the Constitutional Court’s (MK) decision to abolish the presidential threshold, which required a minimum of 20% of DPR seats or 25% of valid national votes in the previous election for presidential candidates, the opposition Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP) has issued a response.

In compliance with the MK’s ruling, PDIP’s Chairman, Said Abdullah, initially pledged full obedience. However, he also highlighted the MK’s consideration to allow political engineering regarding presidential candidate nominations.

"Regarding this ruling, we, as a political party, fully submit and comply, as the MK’s decision is final and binding," Said told reporters on Thursday (2/1/2025). However, he noted that the MK had instructed the government and the DPR to regulate, through a new law, a system that would prevent an excessive number of presidential candidates, potentially undermining the direct election of the president and vice president by the people.

Said, who also serves as the Chairman of the DPR’s Budget Agency, suggested that the nomination process for presidential candidates and running mates could still involve cooperation or coalition between political parties, with non-parliamentary parties also included, as instructed by the MK.

"All political parties have the right to propose presidential and vice-presidential candidates, not based on their DPR seat or valid national vote percentage, but through cooperation or coalition among parties, as long as it does not lead to party dominance," Said explained. He believes this system can be established through constitutional engineering, as directed by the MK, involving all parties, including those without DPR representation.

PDIP aims to strengthen political support in the DPR for the elected presidential and vice-presidential candidates. According to Said, this can be achieved without compromising each party’s right to nominate presidential and vice-presidential candidates.

"The spirit of our deliberations on Article 222 of the Election Law in the DPR is to solidify political support for the elected presidential and vice-presidential candidates to facilitate their policy agenda, budget, and legislation," Said concluded.

Furthermore, PDIP proposed constitutional engineering to tighten the qualifications for presidential and vice-presidential candidates. According to Said, these qualifications could be evaluated by state institutions or representatives of public figures.

"The MK’s ruling on constitutional engineering can also be carried out by setting qualifications for presidential and vice-presidential candidates, such as leadership, public role experience, knowledge of governance, and integrity record," Said suggested. He proposed that these evaluations be conducted by representatives of state institutions and public figures as part of the qualification process for presidential and vice-presidential candidates.

The MK’s ruling in Case No. 62/PUU-XXI/2023, read out by Chief Justice Suhartoyo on Thursday (2/1/2025), declared that Article 222 of Law No. 7 of 2017 on General Elections, which established the presidential threshold, is inconsistent with the 1945 Constitution and has no legal force. The MK granted all requests in the case.

In its consideration, the MK suggested that the government and the DPR revise the Election Law to regulate the number of presidential and vice-presidential candidates, preventing excessive nominations from undermining the direct election process by the people.

This article is derived from a news report published by Detik and has been edited for clarity and SEO optimization.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Golkar Secretary Shocked by MK’s Proposal to Lower Presidential Threshold to 20%

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Shocking Ruling: Indonesia’s Constitutional Court Abolishes Presidential Threshold for Presidential Candidates

Article:

In a monumental and unexpected decision, Indonesia’s Constitutional Court (MK) has ruled to abolish the presidential threshold, a requirement that had been in place since 2017. This decision is set to significantly alter the political landscape of the world’s fourth most populous country as it heads towards the next presidential election.

The MK, chaired by Suhartoyo, delivered the verdict in a session held at the court’s headquarters in Jakarta on Thursday, January 2, 2025. The ruling addressed Case No. 62/PUU-XXI/2023, granting all of the petitions put forth by the applicants.

The abolished presidential threshold, set at 20% of the total seats in the House of Representatives (DPR) or 25% of the national valid votes in the previous election, was a key requirement for candidates seeking the presidency and vice presidency. The threshold was implemented to ensure that presidential candidates had broad-based support, endeavoring to foster a robust and effective presidential system.

Sarmuji, the Secretary General of the Golkar Party, expressed his surprise at the MK’s decision. "We are startled by this MK ruling, given that their previous 27 rulings on this matter had consistently upheld the presidential threshold," he stated, adding, "Both the MK and the legislation have always agreed that the threshold was necessary to strengthen the presidential system."

The MK’s judgment declared that the provisions of the 2017 Election Law concerning the presidential threshold were unconstitutional, as they contravened the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In effect, this reverses a significant regulatory hurdle that had previously been in place to vet presidential hopefuls.

The removal of the presidential threshold is expected to open up the playing field for the next presidential election, potentially changing the dynamics of Indonesia’s political scene. However, the practical implications and potential challenges that may arise from this decision remain to be seen.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts