MK Scrutinizes KPU Jawa Timur for Evasive Answers on Pilgub Jatim Controversy
In a heated exchange during a session, Vice-Chairman of the Constitutional Court (MK), Saldi Isra, reprimanded the Election Supervisory Body (KPU) of East Java for their vague responses. The incident occurred during Panel 2 Hearing No. 265/PHPU.GUB-XXIII/2025 at the MK headquarters in Jakarta on Wednesday (8/1/2026).
Saldi initially inquired about the total number of polling stations (TPS) in East Java from the legal representatives of the East Java governor and vice-governor candidates, particularly focusing on the third candidate, Tri Rismaharini and Zahrul Azhar Asumta Gus Hans, represented by Triwiyono Susilo.
"Can you please specify the total number of TPS in East Java for the gubernatorial election?" Saldi asked.
Triwiyono, however, was unable to provide an accurate response. Saldi promptly addressed the attorney, expressing that such information should be well-known to the legal representative.
"A lawyer should indeed be familiar with this information, especially when being questioned by a judge," Saldi commented.
Saldi then turned his attention to the KPU of East Java, whose responses also fell short of clarity.
"Where’s the KPU of East Java? Can you tell me the total number of TPS?" Saldi questioned.
The KPU of East Java initially failed to provide a precise count, with Saldi mildly ridiculing their response. The KPU of East Java later clarified that there were 64,280 TPS in total.
Earlier, Tri Rismaharini and Zahrul Azhar Asumta Gus Hans had filed a lawsuit against the results of the East Java gubernatorial election, alleging that there were manipulations favoring the second candidate, Khofifah Indar Parawansa, and Emil Dardak. The plaintiffs argued that there were numerous irregularities committed by the Khofifah-Emil pair, with a significant difference of 6,341,164 votes between the KPU’s count and the plaintiffs’ calculation.
Risma-Gus Hans claimed that they didn’t receive votes in several TPS across East Java, leading to suspicion of vote manipulation. Saldi emphasized the importance of clarity and direct responses from all parties involved following a judge’s inquiry.
