Title: Mexican Judicial Reform Under Scrutiny: UN Expert Sounds Alarm
The judicial reform introduced by former Mexican president Andrés Manuel López Obrador has sparked international concern and criticism, with Margaret Satterthwaite, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers, expressing grave worries about its potential consequences.
In a recent article for Open Global Rights, Satterthwaite highlighted that the electoral process for judges, approved in September 2024, has raised red flags not just in Mexico, but also at the international level. The UN Human Rights Committee and her own mandate have both cautioned about the dangers of this new system, emphasizing the need for a selection process based on professional excellence and merit.
Satterthwaite underscored that an independent judiciary is crucial for democratic governance, acting as a check against the other branches of government and ensuring nobody is above the law. "Undermining it is a strike against the human rights protections to which all Mexicans are entitled under international law," she stated.
One of the most contentious aspects of the reform is the shift from merit-based appointments to popular election of judges, including those in higher courts. This marks a significant departure from the system built over the past few decades to ensure the most qualified candidates were selected.
Under the old system, judicial candidates underwent rigorous written and oral exams that evaluated their legal knowledge and analytical skills, with portions conducted anonymously. "While there was still much to improve (issues of corruption and undue influence by powerful actors persisted), the system was producing fruits: Mexico’s judiciary was increasingly composed of the country’s most qualified legal minds," Satterthwaite noted.
However, the new system, she pointed out, relies on recommendation letters from neighbors or friends, without clear guidelines on required relevant experience or how candidates will be selected from the approximately 25,000 registrants for judicial posts.
"Other fundamental questions remain unanswered," Satterthwaite added. "How will the process be protected against organized crime influence? What measures will be implemented to attract qualified and experienced lawyers? What role will civil society play in the process?"
International human rights law demands that judges be competent and integrity-driven, selected through methods that exclude improper motivations. Given their nature, electoral processes risk prioritizing popularity over impartiality and competence.
Satterthwaite’s warnings follow similar concerns raised by Mexican organizations like the Federal Judicial Council (CJF), which has expressed alarm about the risks and human rights violations posed by this reform.
Lee también:
