Tag:

rieke diah pitaloka

Entertainment

Respons Rieke Diah Pitaloka Dijodohkan dengan Dedi Mulyadi

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

The Evolution of National Data Sovereignty: Beyond Simple Statistics

The push for the RUU Satu Data Indonesia (RUU SDI) marks a pivotal shift in how a nation manages its most valuable asset: information. For too long, government data has existed in silos, scattered across various ministries and agencies without a unified coordination framework.

The Evolution of National Data Sovereignty: Beyond Simple Statistics
Data Satu Data Indonesia Satu

The trend is moving toward a “Single Source of Truth.” By integrating numeric and spatial data, the government can move away from viewing data as mere rows of statistics and instead treat it as a strategic tool for national sovereignty.

When data is integrated, the state can make decisions based on a comprehensive map of the country’s needs rather than fragmented reports. This integration is not just a technical upgrade; it is a strategic move to ensure that national data remains under national control, protecting it from external vulnerabilities.

Did you know? The RUU Satu Data Indonesia is designed to be the first regulation specifically dedicated to integrating basic state data, combining both spatial (geographic) and numeric information to create a holistic national database.

Hyper-Local Data: The Key to Ending Social Inequality

One of the most significant trends in modern governance is the shift toward bottom-up data collection. As highlighted by legislator Rieke Diah Pitaloka, national development cannot be effective if it ignores the grassroots level.

From Instagram — related to Data, Dedi Mulyadi

The future of social welfare depends on village-based data. By involving people at the village and sub-district levels, the government can ensure that data is valid and reflective of real-world conditions. This prevents policies from being “mistargeted,” which often leads to social gaps and inequality.

Integrating local insights into a national system ensures that aid, infrastructure, and services reach those who actually demand them, rather than those who simply exist on a flawed digital list.

The Risks of Centralization: Security and Accuracy

While integration offers efficiency, it also creates a “single point of failure.” This is why critical warnings from leaders like Dedi Mulyadi are essential. The trend toward centralized data must be accompanied by two non-negotiable pillars:

  • Input Accuracy: Preventing “wrong input” at the source to avoid systemic errors in policy.
  • Data Leakage Prevention: Ensuring that sensitive national data does not “run” or leak to unauthorized third parties.
Pro Tip: For policymakers, the goal should not just be “collecting more data,” but “collecting cleaner data.” Data hygiene at the village level is more valuable than a massive but inaccurate national database.

The Humanization of Policy: Social Media and Political Engagement

An unexpected trend emerging from the discussion of RUU SDI is the role of organic social media interaction in humanizing complex legislative issues. The friendly interaction between Rieke Diah Pitaloka and Dedi Mulyadi—which led netizens to jokingly “matchmake” them—demonstrates a shift in how the public consumes political news.

CURHATAN RIEKE DIAH PITALOKA MENGENAI JODOH DIRINYA YANG BELUM ADA SAMPAI SEKARANG #shorts

When high-level policy discussions (like the Prolegnas 2026 priorities) are presented through relatable, human interactions, they gain more visibility. While the “shipping” of political figures by netizens may seem trivial, it keeps the conversation around data sovereignty alive in the public consciousness, bridging the gap between dry legal jargon and the general population.

This suggests a future where political engagement is driven less by formal press releases and more by authentic, viral moments that draw attention back to the actual substance of the law.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the RUU Satu Data Indonesia (RUU SDI)?
It is a proposed law aimed at integrating various types of government data, including numeric and spatial data, to strengthen national data sovereignty and improve policy-making.

Why is village-based data significant for national development?
Village-based data ensures that policies are based on valid, real-time information from the grassroots, reducing the risk of mistargeted government programs and social inequality.

What are the primary concerns regarding a national data system?
The main concerns include the accuracy of data entry (preventing wrong inputs) and the security of the data to prevent leaks to unauthorized parties.

Join the Conversation

Do you think a centralized national data system will improve government efficiency, or are the security risks too high? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for more insights on digital governance!

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Entertainment

Rieke PDIP Emosi: Kasus ‘Child Grooming’ Aurelie Moeremans di DPR

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Indonesia Grapples with ‘Child Grooming’: A Rising Tide of Awareness and the Fight for Justice

A recent parliamentary hearing in Jakarta has brought the insidious practice of ‘child grooming’ into sharp focus, sparked by the publication of Indonesian actress Aurelie Moeremans’ memoir, ‘Broken Strings.’ The case, and the impassioned response from lawmaker Rieke Diah Pitaloka, highlights a growing national reckoning with a form of abuse often shrouded in secrecy. But this isn’t just an Indonesian issue; it’s a global phenomenon demanding urgent attention.

The Aurelie Moeremans Case: A Catalyst for Change

Moeremans’ memoir details alleged manipulation and emotional abuse experienced during her youth, a pattern now widely recognized as ‘child grooming.’ The case gained traction on social media, prompting the hashtag #SaveAurelie and igniting a national conversation. Rieke Diah Pitaloka, a member of the PDIP faction in the DPR (House of Representatives), expressed frustration that such cases often go unaddressed unless they achieve viral status. “No viral, no justice,” she stated, a sentiment reflecting a perceived lack of proactive investigation by authorities.

The core of child grooming lies in establishing emotional dependency and trust with a minor, systematically eroding their boundaries and preparing them for exploitation. It’s not simply about sexual advances; it’s a calculated process of manipulation. This is a crucial distinction, as highlighted by Rieke, who emphasized that grooming isn’t a standalone crime but a precursor to more serious offenses.

The Global Rise of Child Grooming and Online Facilitation

While the Aurelie Moeremans case is a recent example, the prevalence of child grooming is a growing concern worldwide. According to a 2023 report by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) in the US, reports of online enticement of children increased by 68% between 2019 and 2022. This surge is directly linked to the increased use of social media and online platforms by young people.

The internet provides groomers with anonymity and access to a vast pool of potential victims. Platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and online gaming communities are frequently exploited. Groomers often pose as peers, offering friendship, support, or shared interests to gain a child’s trust. They then gradually introduce manipulative tactics, isolating the child from their support network.

The Role of Social Media Algorithms

Social media algorithms can inadvertently contribute to the problem. Algorithms designed to maximize engagement may prioritize content that appeals to vulnerable individuals, potentially exposing them to groomers. Furthermore, the echo chamber effect can reinforce harmful beliefs and normalize abusive behavior.

Pro Tip: Parents should familiarize themselves with the privacy settings on their children’s social media accounts and encourage open communication about online interactions. Regularly discuss online safety and the importance of reporting suspicious behavior.

Legal and Societal Challenges in Addressing Child Grooming

One of the biggest challenges in combating child grooming is the lack of specific legislation in many countries, including Indonesia. Often, groomers are prosecuted under broader laws related to sexual abuse or exploitation, which may not fully capture the insidious nature of the grooming process. This can result in lenient sentences and a failure to adequately address the harm caused.

Societal taboos surrounding discussions of sexual abuse also contribute to the problem. Victims may be reluctant to come forward due to fear of stigma, shame, or disbelief. This silence allows groomers to operate with impunity.

Did you know? Grooming can occur offline as well as online. Individuals in positions of trust, such as coaches, teachers, or religious leaders, may exploit their authority to groom children.

Future Trends and Potential Solutions

Several trends are shaping the future of child grooming prevention and intervention:

  • AI-Powered Detection: Artificial intelligence is being developed to identify potential grooming behavior online, analyzing language patterns, image content, and network connections.
  • Enhanced Online Safety Measures: Social media platforms are under increasing pressure to implement stricter safety measures, including age verification, content moderation, and reporting mechanisms.
  • Trauma-Informed Care: A growing emphasis on providing trauma-informed care to victims of grooming, recognizing the long-term psychological impact of abuse.
  • Legislative Reform: Calls for specific legislation criminalizing child grooming as a distinct offense, with harsher penalties for perpetrators.
  • Public Awareness Campaigns: Increased public awareness campaigns to educate parents, educators, and children about the dangers of grooming and how to recognize the warning signs.

The case of Aurelie Moeremans serves as a stark reminder that child grooming is a pervasive and dangerous threat. Addressing this issue requires a multi-faceted approach, involving legal reform, technological innovation, and a fundamental shift in societal attitudes towards sexual abuse.

FAQ

  • What is child grooming? It’s a manipulative process where an adult builds a relationship with a child to gain their trust for abusive purposes.
  • What are the warning signs of grooming? Excessive attention, secretive behavior, gifts, and attempts to isolate the child from their friends and family.
  • What should I do if I suspect a child is being groomed? Report your concerns to the authorities and offer support to the child.
  • Is child grooming only an online problem? No, it can happen both online and offline.

Resources:

Do you have thoughts on this important issue? Share your comments below and let’s continue the conversation.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Entertainment

Tragic Passing of Comedian Mat Solar: Remembering a Legendary Talent

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

The Evolution of Sitcoms in the Digital Age

Sitcoms have long entertained audiences with humorous narratives and beloved characters. In recent years, digital streaming platforms have drastically changed how these shows are consumed. Today, there’s a shift towards creating content that resonates across diverse, global audiences. This trend encourages writers and producers to weave more relevant and socially-conscious storylines that reflect contemporary issues and multicultural perspectives.

The Role of Digital Archiving

In the wake of the passing of iconic figures like Nasrullah, known as Mat Solar, the preservation of comedic art through digital archives has gained significance. Platforms are expanding their services by not only offering streaming but also curating detailed collections of classic episodes, interviews, and behind-the-scenes content. This approach not only honors the legacy of comedians but also provides new generations with a comprehensive understanding of their impact.

Trends in Digital Tributes

The digital age has transformed how celebrities are remembered. Social media platforms like Instagram and Facebook now play a pivotal role in communal grieving and celebrating legacies. The immediacy with which family, colleagues, and fans share their memories and condolences illustrates the globalization of mourning practices, offering an inclusive space for all voices.

Interactive Memorials and Digital Mausoleums

Moreover, digital memorials are evolving into interactive experiences. For instance, virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies allow fans to engage with space dedicated to late celebrities, such as the now-famous Mat Solar digital archives. These technologies enable audiences to relive moments and connect with art in more immersive ways. A recent study highlighted that interactive digital memorials increase emotional engagement by 30% compared to static posts.

Fostering Community and Continued Engagement

Social media has inherently enabled people around the world to connect. In tributes and discussions about beloved figures, there is a growing trend of fostering community through hashtags and dedicated threads. For example, the #RIPMatSolar hashtag functions as both a collective space for mourning and a powerful marketing tool, keeping the comedian’s legacy lively in public discourse.

Future Implications for Content Creation

Content creators are now increasingly mindful of the longevity and legacy of their work. As the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated remote production, it also accelerated the adoption of technologies that withstand sudden changes in the industry landscape. This foresight has proven vital for continuing creative endeavors even in challenging circumstances.

FAQs About Sitcom Evolution and Digital Tributes

How are sitcoms adapting to modern audiences?

Modern sitcoms are integrating more diverse casts and storylines that speak directly to today’s global issues. Streaming platforms are allowing creators to experiment with shorter formats and serialized content that can be consumed at the viewer’s pace.

What makes digital tributes effective?

Effective digital tributes combine personal stories, multimedia content, and interactive elements to create a comprehensive and emotionally resonant experience.

How secure are digital memorials?

Security in digital memorials is prioritized with robust measures such as encryption and access controls, ensuring that these spaces remain respectful and safe for users.

Pro Tips for Engaging with Sitcom Content

Seek out special episodes and bonus content that often provide deeper insights into beloved characters. Engage in community discussions and support fan-created projects to foster a greater appreciation for the comedy you love.

Closing Thoughts

The influence of legendary comedians like Nasrullah continues to ripple through modern media. As the landscape evolves, embracing these digital trends will ensure that cherished comedy moments are preserved and appreciated for generations to come.

Are you also a fan of classic sitcoms or engaged in creating digital memorials? Share your thoughts in the comments below, explore more of our articles for related insights, and consider subscribing to our newsletter for the latest updates in digital content trends.

d, without any additional comments or text.
[/gpt3]

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"Threat Assessment: PDIP’s Warnings on the 12% PPN Content Proposal"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

PDIP Chairperson Questions discipline of DPR Members as Rieke Diah Pitaloka faces MKD Complaint

JAKARTA – Deddy Yevry Sitorus, the Chairman of the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP)’s Central leadership body (DPP), has spoken out about the recent complaint filed against PDIP legislator Rieke Diah Pitaloka with the House of Representatives’ Ethics Council (MKD). The complaint alleges that Pitaloka provoked a negative reaction against the proposed increase in the Value Added Tax (PPN) rate to 12%.

Sitorus expressed puzzlement at the situation, stating, "The action taken by MKD could potentially undermine the critical role of DPR members and erode public trust in the institution. The DPR, as a checks and balances mechanism against the power of the government, relies on its members’ ability to scrutinize and voice their opinions."

The PDIP chairman highlighted that it is unsurprising for DPR members to critically evaluate government policies. Instead, he queried the lack of engagement from legislators who remain silent in public forums. "The real issue should be with members who are indifferent to their responsibilities and the aspirations of the people. The MKD should investigate those who never speak up, either in parliamentary sessions or through mainstream and social media. After all, the people’s money is used to pay these representatives’ salaries," Sitorus stated.

Sitorus believes that MKD should protect the freedom of DPR members to express their views. He warned that using MKD to suppress critical voices could be detrimental to the DPR’s independence. "MKD was established to safeguard the freedom of DPR members to speak out, not to muzzle them. It would be dangerous if MKD were used to silence members who dare to criticize," he added.

It has been revealed that MKD has received a complaint against Pitaloka regarding her request to postpone the PPN rate increase during a DPR plenary meeting. The complaint, signed by MKD Chairman Nazaruddin Dek Gam, was delivered to Pitaloka on December 27, 2024. Although a summons was issued, it was postponed due to the ongoing DPR recess.

In response, Pitaloka questioned the legitimacy of the summons, given the ongoing recess. She also challenged the veracity of the witnesses’ statements and requested information regarding their verification. Pitaloka maintains that she is currently performing her duties as a legislator, making it impossible for her to attend the MKD hearing.

The aftermath of this incident remains to be seen, as the PDIP and other political parties continue to weigh in on the matter. The balance between critical discourse and ethical conduct within the DPR is set to be a hot topic in Indonesian politics.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

"PDIP’s Rieke Addresses Allegations of 12% Commission Provocation Amid MKD Nomination"

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline: Rieke Diah Pitaloka of PDIP Refuses MKD DPR Invitation, Questions Verification Process

In a recent development, Member of Parliament (DPR) and a key figure in the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI Perjuangan), Rieke Diah Pitaloka, has publicly stated that she will not attend a hearing at the DPR’s Ethics Council (MKD DPR) amid allegations of provoking the discussion around the potential increase of Value-Added Tax (PPN) to 12%.

Rieke, in a letter uploaded on her official Instagram account, mentioned that she was unable to attend the MKD DPR hearing due to her current duties as a member of parliament, stating that she was on official business alongside her fellow DPR members during the legislature’s recess.

In her letter, Rieke also questioned the authenticity of the MKD DPR’s summon, asking for confirmation regarding the originating document number 743/PW.09/12/2024, dated December 27, 2024. She expressed her concern about receiving the summon via WhatsApp, rather than through official channels.

Additionally, Rieke raised concerns about the verification process of the witnesses’ statements, requesting the MKD DPR to provide detailed information about the outcome of this process, as specified in the DPR RI Regulation Number 2 Year 2015 on Procedural Rules of the DPR Ethics Council.

The MKD DPR has acknowledged receiving a complaint against Rieke, with the grievance centered around her statement advocating for the postponement of the PPN 12% increase during the DPR’s plenary session.

Chairman of the MKD DPR, Nazaruddin Dek Gam, confirmed receiving the complaint and subsequently summoning Rieke. However, due to the ongoing recess and the absence of DPR members from their constituencies, the hearing has been postponed. Dek Gam assured that further steps would be taken once the DPR resumes its activities.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Entwurf eines geplanten Prüfberichts der MKD wegen der Ernennung von PDIP-Mitgliedern als PPN 12% wird als Provokationhari angesehen

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
PDP‘s Rieke Diah Pitaloka’s Intervention on PPN Hike Sparks Controversy,andet DPR’s MKD

Article:

Rieke Diah Pitaloka, an Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) lawmaker, recently sparked a controversy after her intervention on the proposed 12% Value Added Tax (PPN) hike was viewed as a provocation. Her remarks were subsequently reported to the House of Representatives’ (DPR) Ethics Council (MKD).

Rieke, who is a member of the DPR’s Commission VI representing the PDI-P faction, recently spoke about the contentious PPN increase issue during a plenary session of the DPR. She urged the President-elect, Prabowo Subianto, to reconsider the government’s plan to raise the PPN rate to 12% at the beginning of his tenure.

Rieke’s appeal, made within a packed DPR building at Senayan, Jakarta, was met with mixed reactions. Political figures from Gerindra Party, in particular, have been vocal about opposing the PPN hike. They have been quick to point out that Dolfie Othniel Frederic Palit, the chairman of the taxation task force, is affiliated with the PDI-P.

Rieke’s Intervention and MKD’s Response

In her intervention, Rieke asked President Prabowo to postpone or even scrap the planned PPN hike, aligning with the provisions in the undated Law Number 7 of 2021. She also recommended implementing a self-assessment monitoring system in the tax administration and turning taxes into an anti-corruption tool.

Interestingly, Puan Maharani, the DPR Speaker, shared similar sentiments, stating her confidence in the new government’s dedication to enhancing the public’s well-being. Meanwhile, Sufmi Dasco Ahmad, a DPR Deputy Speaker, suggested an alternative: increasing luxury goods tax by 12% while decreasing tax on essential goods for the populace.

MKD’s Investigation

As a result of these developments, Rieke received a report to the DPR’s MKD. Alfadjri Aditia Prayoga lodged a complaint, alleging that Rieke’s statement contained provocative content pertaining to the 12% PPN hike. Upon receiving the report, MKD Chairman Nazaruddin Dek Gam confirmed the receipt of the complaint and the subsequent summoning of Rieke.

MKD’s initial plans to summon Rieke were delayed due to the ongoing DPR recess. Commission members are currently away from the capital, attending to their constituencies. The matter will be addressed after the recess, with MKD investigation and further actions to follow.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Political Storm: Pitaloka’s PDI-P Challenged at MKD for Stirring 12% PPN Rejection Protests

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Title: Rieke Diah Pitaloka Dilaporkan ke MKD soal Provokasi Tolak PPN 12 Persen

Article:

JAKARTA, KOMPAS.com – Anggota Fraksi PDI-P DPR RI Rieke Diah Pitaloka dilaporkan ke Mahkamah Kehormatan Dewan (MKD) atas dugaan pelanggaran kode etik. Ketua MKD DPR RI Nazaruddin Dek Gam mengkonfirmasi bahwa laporan terhadap Rieke diterima oleh pihaknya dari pengadu pada 20 Desember 2024. Politikus PAN itu juga mengonfirmasi surat pemanggilan Rieke oleh MKD akibat dugaan pelanggaran etik yang dilakukannya.

"Laporan ada, laporan ada. Benar, surat saya saya tanda tangan kok. Enggak mungkin ada surat kalau enggak ada laporan, benar ada laporan," kata Dek Gam saat dihubungi, Minggu (29/12/2024).

Menurut Dek Gam, laporan terhadap Rieke年連続 Coming from the pengadu bernama Alfadjri Aditia Prayoga, yang mengadu soal pernyataan Rieke dalam konten di media sosial yang dianggap memprovokasi warga menolak kebijakan PPN 12 persen.

Meski demikian, Dek Gam belum mau berkomentar lebih jauh soal pelaporan Rieke. Dia hanya menegaskan bahwa MKD kemungkinan bakal menunda pemanggilan Rieke yang seharusnya dilakukan Senin (30/12/2024).

"Iya surat pemanggilan itu, iya surat pemanggilan itu memang aku tanda tangan. Tapi kan kita masih libur (sidang) nih, masih reses. Jadi anggota-anggota masih di dapil. Jadi kita tunda dulu lah," katanya.

Baca juga:

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Rieke Diah Pitaloka Presses For Delay in VAT Increase

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
MP from PDI Perjuangan, Rieke Diah Pitaloka, Facing Ethics Probe Over PPN Hike Remarks

Subhead:
Parliament’s Ethics Body Receives Complaint Amid PPI 12% Increase Controversy

Article:

A member of Indonesia’s House of Representatives (DPR) from the PDI Perjuangan faction, Rieke Diah Pitaloka, is being investigated by the Mahkamah Kehormatan Dewan (MKD) following a complaint regarding her statements calling for the postponement of the planned 12% increase in the Value Added Tax (PPN). The MKD confirmed receiving the complaint, which alleges a potential ethics violation.

Dek Gam, the MKD’s chairman, verified the existence of the complaint. "Yes, the report is there. It’s true, I’ve signed the letter, and there’s no letter without a report. Yes, there is a report," he told reporters.

A summon letter circulating online reveals that the MKD received a complaint accusing Rieke of violation of parliamentary ethics codes due to her public statements that appeared to incite dissent against the PPN hike.

The MKD has scheduled Rieke’s officially summon for Monday, December 30, at the MKD’s conference room. However, the hearing has been postponed due to the ongoing recess, as many DPR members remain in their respective districts.

Previously, Rieke publicly opposed the planned PPN increase during a plenary session. "I propose in this plenary session that we support President Prabowo’s plan to postpone, or even scrap, the 12% PPN hike," she said during an unexpected intervention.

Stay informed as we continue to monitor this developing story. (yoa/pta)

[End of Article]

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

PDIP’s Rieke Under Fire for Criticizing 12% PPN Rate; DPR Delays Calling MKD for Questioning

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

Headline:
Indonesian Parliament‘s Ethics Panel Summons PDIP MP Rieke Diah Pitaloka Over PPN 12% Delay Remarks

Article:

The Ethics Committee of the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR), known as the Mahkamah Kehormatan Dewan (MKD), has received a complaint against PDI Perjuangan (PDIP) member Rieke Diah Pitaloka. The complaint arises from her remarks during a DPR plenary session, calling for the delay of the 12% Value-Added Tax (PPN) hike.

According to a document received by detik.com on Sunday, December 29, 2024, a letter numbered 743/PW.09/12/2024, dated December 27, 2024, was signed by the MKD chairman, Nazaruddin Dek Gam. The complainant, identified as Alfadjri Aditia Prayoga, filed the complaint on December 20, 2024, leading to an invitation for Ms. Rieke to the MKD’s boardroom on December 30, 2024.

The complaint, as cited in the letter, alleges a breach of ethics due to Ms. Rieke’s remarks on social media, urging people to reject the PPN 12% policy. MKD chairman Dek Gam confirmed receipt of the complaint and the ensuing summons but noted that it has been delayed due to the ongoing recess period. Members are currently in their respective constituencies, making a gathering unfeasible at the moment. Dek Gam mentioned that further actions would be determined by the panel upon their reconvening.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

PDIP’s U-turn: Criticizing the 12% PPN Tax Hike

by Chief Editor
written by Chief Editor

"Political Tug-of-War Over PPN 12%: PDIP‘s About-Face Raises Eyebrows

The Indonesian political landscape is abuzz with a heated debate surrounding the impending increase in Value Added Tax (PPN) to 12%, slated for 2025. The harmonization of tax regulations (HPP) law, passed in October 2021, is theLejjidad. However, the finger-pointing game has begun, with each political party trying to distance itself from the unpopular decision.

PDIP’s Rieke Diah Pitaloka recently took the floor at the DPR’s plenary meeting, urging President Prabowo Subianto to reconsider the PPN hike, even suggesting it as a New Year’s gift for the people. She proposes implementing self-assessment monitoring systems in tax management and believes that taxes can be a tool to combat corruption. Her plea has been met with mixed reactions, with some questioning PDIP’s sincerity, given their role in passing the HPP law.

Gerindra’s Wihadi Wiyanto was quick to counter, reminding everyone that the decision to raise PPN lies with the HPP law, a product of the previous DPR period, spearheaded by PDIP. He accused PDIP of having a ‘U-turn’ attitude, now asking for the government to step in. Wihadi further criticized PDIP for their role in initiating the PPN increase, now trying to distance themselves from the decision.

Sara Gerindra, Rahayu Saraswati Djojohadikusumo, added fuel to the fire, expressing her surprise at PDIP’s sudden opposition to PPN 12% when they were instrumental in its initiation during their tenure as chairs of the relevant committee. She questioned PDIP’s motives and genuine commitment to the people’s best interests.

PDIP’s Dolfie Othniel Frederic Palit attempted to deflect the blame, claiming that the HPP law is an Initiative of the Jokowi administration. He highlighted that the law, modeled after an Omnibus Bill, modifies several tax laws and introduces voluntary taxpayer disclosure and carbon tax programs. While acknowledging the government’s right to alter the PPN rate within a 5-15% range, he emphasized the need for balanced economic growth and increased welfare for the people.

As the political wrangling continues, one thing is clear: the PPN 12% increase is seemingly here to stay, barring any unexpected U-turns or political maneuvering. Only time will tell how this tax hike will affect the Indonesian economy and the people’s livelihoods.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail