Lee Cheuk-hing, the former principal of San Wui Commercial Society Secondary School, is reviewing his summary dismissal following an incident in Singapore. After the school board rejected his resignation and terminated his contract on June 3 without compensation, lawmakers suggested the move could face a high legal threshold in court.
What led to the dismissal of Lee Cheuk-hing?
The dismissal follows an incident on May 22 during a school trip to Singapore. Lee was filmed swearing at security guards, an event that prompted his suspension and an investigation by the Education Bureau.
Last Friday, Lee announced he had appointed legal representatives to review the school board’s decision. The board had rejected his attempt to resign, opting instead to terminate his contract with immediate effect.
What are the potential legal and financial consequences?
A lawmaker has likened the summary dismissal to a “death sentence in the labour sector.” They stated that the school could face a high legal threshold to justify the move if the dispute is taken to court.
There are also concerns regarding the principal’s financial entitlements. Another lawmaker noted that the termination might affect Lee’s payments from the Subsidised Schools Provident Fund.
The stakes for such funds are notable. According to South China Morning Post calculations, 2,581 teachers withdrew an average of HK$3.38 million each from the Subsidised Schools Provident Fund last year, which provides payments upon retirement, resignation, dismissal, or death.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was the principal of San Wui Commercial Society Secondary School dismissed?
Lee Cheuk-hing was dismissed after being filmed swearing at security guards during a school trip to Singapore on May 22.
When was the contract terminated?
The school board terminated the contract with immediate effect on June 3.
What action is Lee Cheuk-hing taking?
Lee has appointed legal representatives to review his dismissal after the school board rejected his resignation.
How should schools balance disciplinary actions with the legal rights of their employees?