The New Frontier of Digital Identity Protection
In an era where artificial intelligence can mirror a human voice or recreate a photorealistic image in seconds, the boundary between a public persona and a protected asset is blurring. High-profile figures are no longer relying solely on traditional copyright laws; they are turning to trademark law to build a digital fortress around their identity.

The recent strategic move by Taylor Swift’s company, TAS Rights Management, to trademark specific vocal phrases and iconic imagery signals a pivotal shift in how celebrities manage their intellectual property. By filing for sound trademarks—specifically for the phrases “Hey, it’s Taylor Swift” and “Hey, it’s Taylor”—Swift is attempting to legally own the “sound” of her identity.
Trademarking a spoken voice is a relatively untapped legal strategy. According to intellectual property attorney Josh Gerben, attempting to register a celebrity’s spoken voice is a new use of trademark registration that has not yet been tested in court.
Beyond Copyright: Why Voice Trademarks Matter
For decades, artists have used copyright to protect the songs they write and the recordings they produce. However, copyright does not always cover the inherent quality of a person’s voice or their general likeness. This gap has been exploited by the rise of AI-generated deepfakes and unauthorized voice clones.
By utilizing trademarks, artists can potentially challenge more than just identical copies. Josh Gerben notes that registering specific phrases tied to a voice could allow a celebrity to challenge imitations that are “confusingly similar,” which is a core standard in trademark law.
This approach moves the conversation from “Who owns this recording?” to “Who owns the right to sound like this person?”
The Battle Against AI Misuse
The urgency behind these filings is driven by a surge in AI-created content. Taylor Swift has already been the target of fake AI-generated sexually explicit images and AI images posted to Truth Social by Donald Trump, which falsely suggested she endorsed him for president.
When the tools for deception become this accessible, the “clear perimeter” mentioned by other stars becomes a necessity for survival in the digital economy.
When using AI tools to generate content, be wary of “confusingly similar” likenesses. As more public figures trademark their voice and image, the legal risk for using AI clones of celebrities without consent will likely increase.
Creating a “Clear Perimeter” Around Likeness
Swift is not alone in this strategy. Matthew McConaughey previously trademarked his famous “All right, all right, all right” catchphrase to combat AI fakes and other unauthorized uses of his image and voice.
McConaughey’s philosophy highlights the core objective of this trend: consent. In a statement, he emphasized, “My team and I want to know that when my voice or likeness is ever used, it’s because I approved and signed off on it.” He further stated the goal is to ensure that “consent and attribution [are] the norm in an AI world.”
This trend suggests a future where celebrity likenesses are treated as licensed software—where any use of a voice or image requires a digital key or a signed contract, regardless of whether the content is a song, a commercial, or a social media post.
The Strategy of Visual Trademarks
Protecting the voice is only half the battle. The move to trademark specific visual snapshots is equally strategic. For example, TAS Rights Management sought to protect a specific image of Swift from her Eras Tour, described as her holding a pink guitar with a black strap, wearing a multi-colored iridescent bodysuit with silver boots on a pink stage.
By trademarking the specific “seem and feel” of a performance—similar to how she previously trademarked Female Rage: The Musical—artists can prevent AI from generating “new” images that mimic the exact branding of a specific tour or era.
For more on how intellectual property is evolving, you can explore our guides on digital IP rights and AI legal trends.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can anyone trademark their voice?
While anyone can file an application, trademarks are typically granted to those who can prove the mark identifies a specific source of goods or services. For celebrities, their voice is often inextricably linked to their commercial brand.

How is a trademark different from a copyright?
Copyright protects original works of authorship (like a song). A trademark protects symbols, names, and sounds used to identify and distinguish a brand in the marketplace.
Will this stop all AI deepfakes?
Trademarks provide a legal basis for lawsuits and takedown requests, but they cannot physically stop an AI from generating an image. They do, however, make it much easier for the owner to seek damages or force the removal of the content.
Join the Conversation
Do you suppose celebrities should be able to own their voice and likeness as trademarks, or does this limit creative expression and parody? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for the latest in tech and entertainment law.
d, without any additional comments or text.
[/gpt3]
