The UK government’s carbon capture and storage (CCS) programme faces scrutiny as projected costs reach £264bn by 2050, according to analysis by climate experts Dr. Andrew Boswell and Simon Oldridge. While official government press releases estimate spending at £21.7bn, this figure represents only the project’s initial phase. The full cost, as identified by Boswell and Oldridge, includes significant long-term financial commitments that could shift the burden onto taxpayers and energy bill payers.
How Much Will Carbon Capture Actually Cost?
The projected £264bn price tag for the full CCS programme far exceeds the government’s publicly stated figures. Data from the Climate Change Committee (CCC) suggests this expenditure will be split between the public and private sectors. An investigation by the House of Commons public accounts committee determined that approximately 25% of public costs will be funded directly by the government, while the remainder is expected to be recovered through levies on consumer energy bills. This implies a potential transfer of up to £198bn in costs to household energy accounts. Additionally, government documents reveal an uncosted commitment to pay a “premium” for hydrogen produced via CCS for 15 years, a move that could add tens of billions more to the total.
The UK government has attempted to implement CCS schemes several times, including the 2005 Peterhead plan and a 2012 funding competition, all of which were abandoned due to cost escalation and infeasibility.
Why Is CCS Facing Criticism as a Climate Solution?
Critics argue that the programme is ineffective at reducing emissions, with some suggesting it may actually increase them. The CCC notes that CCS deployment is intended for hard-to-abate sectors like chemicals and cement; however, data indicates only 5% to 6% of the planned UK deployment targets these industries. The vast majority of the projects are linked to fossil fuel-based power stations and hydrogen production from fossil gas. Because these plants require significant gas consumption, they necessitate increased imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG). According to reports, LNG often carries a higher greenhouse gas footprint than coal due to methane leakage during production and transport.
Who Influences CCS Policy?
The push for CCS has been linked to significant lobbying efforts by major oil companies. In 2023, Equinor, BP, and ExxonMobil held 24 meetings with Conservative ministers to discuss the technology. Investigative work by ProPublica and Drilled suggests that the scientific framework for CCS was heavily shaped by BP. Specifically, the 2004 “Wedges” paper—a foundational document for global climate policy—was financed and guided by BP executives. The paper presented CCS as an “already deployed at an industrial scale” technology at a time when it had barely been tested. BP is currently the lead operator for the government’s first CCS cluster.
Pro Tip: Tracking Energy Policy
To stay updated on how government spending impacts your utility costs, regularly review the reports published by the House of Commons public accounts committee. These documents provide the most granular detail on how public funds and consumer levies are allocated toward large-scale infrastructure projects.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the total projected cost of the UK’s CCS programme?
While the government has cited £21.7bn for the first phase, climate experts Dr. Andrew Boswell and Simon Oldridge project the total cost to reach £264bn by 2050.
Who pays for the carbon capture programme?
According to the House of Commons public accounts committee, 25% of costs will be borne by the government, while the remainder is expected to be covered by levies on consumer energy bills.
Are there alternatives to carbon capture for power generation?
Yes. Experts point to the rapid evolution of battery technology and the expansion of renewable energy sources as more efficient, lower-cost ways to ensure a stable electricity supply without relying on fossil fuels.
Is hydrogen produced from fossil gas cleaner than other methods?
No. CCC data indicates that producing hydrogen from gas with CCS is expected to cost twice as much by 2050 as producing hydrogen via the electrolysis of water using renewable electricity.
Stay informed on the latest developments in energy policy and climate infrastructure. Subscribe to our newsletter for deep-dive analysis on how national spending affects your future.
