Indonesia’s Think Tank Gap in the G-20
The University of Pennsylvania’s Lauder Institute recently identified several Indonesian research institutions, including CSIS and SMERU, as top-tier performers in its Global Go To Think Tank Index Report. While these institutions earned international recognition, Indonesia hosts only 37 registered think tanks. This figure places the country behind its G-20 peers, as nine of the world’s top ten think tank nations belong to the G-20 forum.
The United States currently leads global rankings with 2,203 institutions, followed by China with 1,413 and India with 612. Total global registration stands at 11,175. Indonesia’s count remains low despite its G-20 status, a contrast highlighted by Vietnam’s 10th-place global ranking with 180 institutions.
Vietnam’s Model for Evidence-Based Policy
Vietnam’s growth as a hub for policy research dates back to the 1986 Doi Moi economic reforms. Institutions like the Central Institute for Economic Management (CIEM) and the Diplomatic Academy of Vietnam (DAV) function as intellectual motors, connecting academic findings directly to state policymaking. These groups provide the government with data-driven scenario simulations and policy briefs to navigate economic shifts.
This integration of research into governance corresponds with Vietnam’s economic performance, which reached 8 percent growth in 2025. By facilitating independent discussion spaces for stakeholders, these think tanks act as a bridge between developmental goals and state action.
Correlation Between Governance and Human Development
Data from 2023 shows a positive correlation of 0.732 between government effectiveness and the Human Development Index (HDI) across G-20 nations. While countries like Australia, Germany, and Canada maintain high scores in both categories, Indonesia currently falls below the linear trend-line for G-20 member states.
Development planning in Indonesia often faces challenges from sectoral ego and rigid bureaucratic structures. Think tanks offer a mechanism to mitigate these issues by serving as “idea factories.” They translate complex research into actionable advice, helping policymakers avoid the pitfalls of projects that proceed without public participation or consideration of environmental limits.
Institutional Synergies for Golden Indonesia 2045
Law 59/2024 established the National Long-Term Development Plan (RPJPN) to guide the country toward its Golden Indonesia 2045 vision. Achieving these social, economic, and governance transformations requires a research ecosystem that bridges the gap between political interests and scientific evidence. Government bodies including the Ministry of National Development Planning (Bappenas), the National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), and the National Institute of Public Administration (LAN) hold the responsibility to oversee planners, researchers, and policy analysts. Increasing the national research budget—currently at 0.3 percent of GDP—remains a core requirement for supporting this infrastructure.
How Independent Research Institutions Shape Public Policy and Economic Growth
Why is the number of think tanks considered a measure of governance?
Think tanks act as independent voices that translate academic research into accessible language for both the public and policymakers. A higher density of these institutions suggests a more robust framework for evidence-based decision-making and public accountability.
How do think tanks influence national economic growth?
By preparing policy briefs and scenario simulations, think tanks allow governments to anticipate economic risks and formulate sustainable development strategies. This process helps bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical policy implementation, as seen in the development models used by Vietnam.
What is the role of think tanks in the Golden Indonesia 2045 vision?
They serve as strategic partners that provide rapid response recommendations and data-driven analysis to the government. Their role is to ensure that national development plans are not trapped by sectoral interests and that they remain grounded in scientific evidence.
Keep reading