The United States government has moved to deport Iranian, Syrian, and Afghan nationals to the Central African Republic (CAR) as part of a strategy involving third-party country agreements. According to reports confirmed by Reuters, the Department of State and the CAR presidency reached a recent deal to facilitate these transfers, raising significant legal and human rights concerns regarding the safety of those being relocated.
Why is the U.S. using third-party countries for deportations?
The Trump administration has increasingly relied on bilateral agreements with third-party nations to remove individuals who cannot be legally returned to their home countries. According to U.S. officials, these agreements provide a legal mechanism to process individuals who have exhausted their legal options in the U.S. but face insurmountable barriers to repatriation. By utilizing these diplomatic channels, the administration seeks to circumvent the logistical and political challenges of deporting individuals to nations with which the U.S. lacks formal extradition or repatriation treaties.

The U.S. government provided an $85 million grant to the International Organization for Migration (IOM) this year to support operations within the Central African Republic. While the IOM is providing “post-arrival humanitarian assistance” in Bangui, the agency has stated it is not involved in the actual transport of these migrants.
What are the legal risks for deported asylum seekers?
Legal advocates argue that these transfers ignore existing protections for vulnerable populations. Emily Trostle, a lawyer representing two Iranian women slated for deportation, stated that her clients are at high risk of persecution and torture if forced to return to their home country. According to court records, both women had already received “withholding of deportation” status—a legal protection granted to individuals who face a greater than 50 percent chance of being harmed in their country of origin.

Comparison: Government Claims vs. Human Rights Concerns
| Perspective | Stance on Transfers |
|---|---|
| U.S. Government | Maintains that the process is legally sound and ensures a “fair process” for all individuals. |
| Rights Advocates | Argues the deals lack transparency and place asylum seekers in unstable, dangerous environments. |
How does the Central African Republic handle these arrivals?
Migrants arriving in Bangui, the capital of the Central African Republic, are reportedly being housed in temporary apartment complexes. The logistical arrangements are managed under the recent agreement between Washington and the CAR government. However, critics point to the country’s volatile history; the CAR has struggled with cycles of instability and poverty since gaining independence from France in 1960. Ali Rahnama, interim legal director at the Iranian American Legal Defense Fund, described the policy as a contradiction, noting that while the U.S. claims to support Iranians fighting for democracy, it is sending asylum seekers back toward the very regimes they fled.

For those tracking immigration policy, monitoring Department of State bilateral agreements often provides more insight into deportation trends than Department of Homeland Security filings alone, as these deals are frequently negotiated at the diplomatic level.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Are these deportations permanent? The transfers are part of a government-led removal strategy, though the long-term legal status of these individuals in the CAR remains unclear.
- Why the Central African Republic? The U.S. has established a bilateral agreement with the CAR government to accept these individuals, supported by significant U.S. grants to the region.
- Is the IOM involved in moving these people? No. The IOM has clarified it is not involved in the transfer process, but will provide humanitarian aid to the arrivals upon request by the CAR government.
Have questions about current immigration policy or international asylum law? Subscribe to our newsletter to receive updates on legal developments and human rights reporting.
Keep reading