Seven Inland Border Facilities
HMRC said Birmingham, Ebbsfleet and North Weald did not require the acquisition of land.
Taxpayer costs for the Dover White Cliffs site
The most controversial British zombie facility was known as Dover white cliffs.
Another £17m was spent on a border facility in Birmingham planned at the airport car park. Newly released information shows it cost £11m to build with £6m in closure costs.
Local people vehemently opposed the site at the time. It cost £7m to buy, £9m to build and £1m to decommission.
This airfield was commandeered for the same purpose, to avert congestion on the M25. It cost £3m to build and £2m to close down.
Capital and operational costs for Sevington
The government previously revealed in a parliamentary question that total capital costs ran to £154m.
According to the FoI, the site cost £14m to acquire and another £23m to build.
The hi-tech facility was built to government specifications to handle post-Brexit checks, compared with the 80 checks originally envisioned.
Did You Know?
Frequently Asked Questions
How much was spent on the Sevington inland border facility?
Costs for the Sevington inland border facility in Kent ran to £154m in capital costs. HMRC has also revealed through freedom of information that the operational costs have run to £179m.
What happened at the Dover White Cliffs site in Guston?
Information from HMRC shows the facility has so far cost the taxpayer £28m, even though it remains a field. The Department for Transport paid £21m to procure the site and spent £7m on initial ground works, including an archaeological survey for any Roman remains.
How many trailer checks are conducted daily at Portsmouth port?
According to Portsmouth port’s director, Mike Sellers, only two trailer checks take place on average each day at the border control post, compared with the 80 checks originally envisioned.
How will local authorities manage the ongoing financial shortfalls resulting from these decommissioned and underused border facilities?
Related reading