We will not be bullied, SA tells US

by Rachel Morgan News Editor

A recent march in Johannesburg signaled growing public frustration with perceived US interference in South African affairs, coinciding with a resurgence of grassroots support for the African National Congress (ANC) ahead of the 2026 local government elections.

Rising Tensions

The demonstration, which proceeded from Newtown to Constitution Hill in Braamfontein, saw protesters carrying placards with messages like “We will not be bullied” and “In defence of our sovereignty and democratic gains.” These sentiments mirrored earlier warnings from President Cyril Ramaphosa against what he termed bullying tactics from the United States.

ICJ Case and US Intervention

The escalating tensions are further complicated by differing views on the International Court of Justice (ICJ) case concerning allegations of genocide. President Ramaphosa has criticised US President Donald Trump’s attacks on South Africa’s foreign policy and transformation initiatives. Trump has accused the South African government of enabling “white genocide” due to farm killings, a claim rejected by the South African government, civil society, and international observers.

The ICJ has found genocidal intent plausible, and the International Criminal Court has indicted Israeli officials for crimes against humanity. On March 13th, the US formally intervened at the ICJ, labeling South Africa’s genocide allegations as false and aiming to prevent a ruling of genocide against Israel, a key US ally. The US argued that Israel does not possess the “specific intent” required to establish genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention and suggested the case is part of a broader campaign against the country.

Did You Know? The African National Congress (ANC) was founded in 1912 as the South African Native National Congress.

Ambassadorial Concerns

Recently, US Ambassador to South Africa, Leo Brent Bozell III, expressed disappointment with Pretoria’s response to “five asks” from the US government. These requests include abolishing broad-based black economic empowerment, addressing farm attacks, handling the “Kill the Boer” song, reconsidering land expropriation, securing a deal regarding South Africa’s critical minerals, and resolving issues related to digital transformation.

The ANC has refused to alter its transformation policies, and ANC deputy secretary-general Nomvula Mokonyane criticised the US envoy for making “undiplomatic statements.” The People’s March culminated in the presentation of a memorandum to Minister of Justice Mmamoloko Kubayi.

Expert Insight: The current diplomatic friction highlights a fundamental disagreement over sovereignty and the right of nations to pursue their own internal policies without external pressure. The US’s intervention in the ICJ case and its direct requests to South Africa demonstrate a willingness to actively shape the political landscape, which is being met with increasing resistance.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the ANC’s position on the US requests?

The ANC has refused to alter its transformation policies and criticised the US Ambassador for “undiplomatic statements.”

What is the US position on the ICJ case?

The US formally intervened at the ICJ, labelling South Africa’s genocide allegations as false and aiming to prevent a ruling of genocide against Israel.

What was the purpose of the march in Johannesburg?

The march was a demonstration of public frustration with the United States’ involvement in South Africa’s internal affairs.

As relations between South Africa and the United States become increasingly strained, what impact might this have on future diplomatic and economic cooperation between the two nations?

You may also like

Leave a Comment