/data/photo/2026/01/15/696856074fb69.jpeg "696856074fb69.jpeg")
Former staff member Jurist Tan remains a key figure in the corruption case involving the procurement of Chromebook laptops, a scandal that led to a 10-year prison sentence for his former superior, Nadiem Makarim. While Makarim was sentenced by the Jakarta Corruption Court on June 30, 2026, authorities have confirmed that Tan is currently not in Indonesia.
Status of the Investigation
The Attorney General’s Office (Kejagung) has officially confirmed that Jurist Tan is outside the country. Anang Supriatna, Head of the Legal Information Center at the Attorney General’s Office, stated on July 2, 2026, that the office is actively pursuing the suspect. To facilitate this, the Kejagung has formally requested that Interpol issue a red notice for Tan, though approval is currently pending.
The Indonesian National Police previously indicated they have tracked Tan’s location. On September 22, 2025, Brigadier General Untung Widyatmoko, Secretary of the NCB Interpol Indonesia, stated that the agency was aware of Tan’s whereabouts. However, the police have declined to disclose the specific country or city to the public, citing ongoing procedural requirements.
During the sentencing of Nadiem Makarim on June 30, 2026, the court imposed a 10-year prison term and a Rp 1 billion fine, marking a significant legal conclusion to the Chromebook procurement corruption scandal.
Judicial Findings on Authority
The Jakarta Corruption Court’s verdict highlighted that the corruption was not an isolated incident but a result of systematic planning. During the sentencing, Judge Sunoto noted that Nadiem Makarim abused his authority by appointing Jurist Tan as a special staffer with broad, excessive powers.
According to the court, this arrangement was not coincidental. Judges determined that the administrative structure was specifically designed to grant Tan unusual authority, a plan that the court found was formulated even before Makarim was officially inaugurated as a minister.
The court’s focus on the “systematic” nature of the staff appointments suggests a legal strategy aimed at dismantling the internal mechanisms that enabled the alleged corruption. By linking the appointment of staff to a pre-inauguration plan, the judiciary has signaled that administrative oversight failures are being treated as central to the criminal conspiracy, rather than mere procedural errors.
What May Happen Next
The legal proceedings regarding Jurist Tan are expected to move into a new phase once the international search process advances. Should the Interpol red notice be approved, it would significantly increase the pressure on the suspect and facilitate cooperation with foreign law enforcement agencies. Given that the Indonesian authorities already claim to have identified his location, a formal extradition request or an international law enforcement operation remains a possible next step in bringing the case to a conclusion.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where is Jurist Tan currently located?
According to the Attorney General’s Office, Jurist Tan is not in Indonesia. While the Indonesian National Police stated in September 2025 that they know his location, they have not disclosed it to the public.
What is the status of the red notice for Jurist Tan?
The Attorney General’s Office has confirmed they have requested a red notice from Interpol, but as of July 2, 2026, the request has not yet been approved.
Why did the court implicate Nadiem Makarim in the appointment of his staff?
The court ruled that Makarim abused his authority by systematically placing Jurist Tan in a position with powers that exceeded the scope of a standard staffer, noting this was planned before Makarim took office.
How do you view the use of international legal channels in resolving domestic corruption cases that involve suspects who have fled abroad?
