/data/photo/2026/02/18/69959b35f2222.jpg)
Advocate Muhammad Firdaus Oiwobo has filed a formal police report against former Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM) Student Executive Board (BEM) chairman Tiyo Ardianto at the Tangerang Selatan Police Station. The complaint, registered on June 15, 2026, under case number LP/B/1867/VI/2026/SPKT/POLRES TANGERANG SELATAN/POLDA METRO JAYA, centers on a viral video in which Ardianto allegedly urged the public to stop supporting the government’s Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) program.
Why the report was filed
Firdaus Oiwobo initiated legal action after claiming the video contained inflammatory content that went beyond simple criticism. According to his statement, the video included an explicit call for the public to abandon the MBG program and characterized the Satuan Pelayanan Pemenuhan Gizi (SPPG) as an organization labeled with derogatory terms regarding their affiliation with President Prabowo.
What happens next in the investigation
The Tangerang Selatan Police have formally accepted the report and have begun the investigative process. As a potential next step, investigators are scheduled to conduct an examination of Firdaus Oiwobo to provide further testimony regarding his role as the complainant. While the case is in its early stages, the police will likely review the digital evidence and determine if the statements made in the video meet the criteria for criminal charges under existing statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the subject of the police report?
The subject is Tiyo Ardianto, the former chairman of the BEM UGM.
What specific allegations were made against the subject?
Firdaus Oiwobo alleges that Ardianto incited the public to stop participating in the government’s MBG program and used derogatory language toward the SPPG.
What is the current status of the legal proceedings?
The report has been registered at the Tangerang Selatan Police Station, and the complainant is scheduled to undergo an official examination by police investigators.
How do you think digital platforms should balance the right to free expression with the potential for legal consequences regarding government-led initiatives?
Keep reading