Francis Fukuyama warns that the United States is at serious risk of losing the new Cold War to China, driven by a combination of flawed foreign policy maneuvers and an underestimation of Beijing’s capabilities, according to an analysis published on persuasion.com. The political scientist points to the Donald Trump administration’s handling of Iran as a primary sign of erratic statecraft, arguing that reckless political disruptions hinder effective long-term geopolitical competition.
Institutional Quality Versus Raw Economic Output
Assessing national power goes far beyond official statistics and gross domestic product metrics, according to Fukuyama’s analysis. He points to historical blind spots during the 20th century, noting that Paul Samuelson’s famous economics textbook repeatedly featured flawed charts predicting Soviet production would soon double that of the United States. While the Soviet economy suffered deep stagnation, intelligence communities treated official output numbers as absolute truth.
A similar miscalculation occurred prior to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, where a Western consensus assumed Kyiv stood no chance against a larger adversary. Analysts overlooked widespread Russian corruption and institutional waste. Although Russian GDP grew from 780 милиарда долара in 2000 to 1,5 трилиона долара in 2015, that growth relied on commodity windfalls funneled into corrupt networks rather than sustainable productivity gains.
The Lessons of Stefan Possony on Wartime Capital
Fukuyama draws on the work of Stefan Possony, a strategist from the original Cold War era who argued that command-control, autarkic economies cannot sustain modern, industrialized warfare. According to Possony’s writings examined in Fukuyama’s book Unlimited, only nations possessing deep pools of productive capital embedded in international trade possess the strategic depth required for large conflicts.
Tariffs, trade barriers, and protectionist industrial policies drain productive resources rather than build resilience. Flexible market economies adapt far more rapidly to the unpredictable shocks of modern warfare than rigid, top-down systems that attempt to mimic authoritarian models.
Pro Tip: When evaluating global power dynamics, look past raw economic output and examine the institutional resilience, adaptability, and political stability of a nation.
Internal Decay and Alliance Erosion
While China’s economic rise expanded its real GDP from roughly 1 трилион долара in 1990 to 16 трилиона долара in 2022, satellite data tracking night-time light growth suggests actual expansion in China and India may have moved slower than official figures indicate between 1993 and 2013. Fukuyama notes that the greater danger for the United States lies in domestic political dysfunction and policies that alienate international partners.
Possony and his co-authors warned back in 1961 that internal national strength serves as the primary guarantee of allied loyalty. By undermining domestic institutional strength and pushing away cooperative partners, Washington risks eroding the alliances necessary to maintain global leadership in the ongoing geopolitical competition.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is autarky in economics?
Autarky refers to an economic system where a state is completely self-sufficient and refuses to participate in international trade, with North Korea serving as a modern historical example.
Why does Francis Fukuyama argue the US is losing the new Cold War?
According to Fukuyama, flawed foreign policy decisions, domestic political dysfunction, and the self-inflicted erosion of economic and institutional strength leave the United States ill-equipped to compete with China.
What did historical miscalculations teach analysts about Soviet and Russian data?
Historical miscalculations stem from trusting official production statistics and raw GDP figures while ignoring deeper institutional rot, widespread corruption, and systemic economic stagnation.
Explore more analyses on global politics, and subscribe to our newsletter for regular updates on international relations and economic trends.
Keep reading