Astana’s Bold Shift: Are Wins the New Currency in Pro Cycling?
XDS-Astana is making a statement. After a frantic 2025 campaign focused almost entirely on accumulating UCI points to secure WorldTour status, the Kazakhstani team is pivoting. Despite a remarkable one-day haul of 1,068 points this week – fueled by dominance at the Tour of Oman and the Asian Continental Championships – team directeur sportif Dmitry Fofonov insists the focus is now squarely on winning races, not chasing numbers.
From Survival Mode to Victory Focus
Last year, XDS-Astana’s strategy was born of necessity. They needed points, and they needed them fast. The team racked up 32 wins and 6,727 UCI points, finishing fourth in the season-end rankings during the three-year license period. This year, yet, the situation is different. With WorldTour status secured, the team can afford to prioritize prestige and performance over purely tactical point-grabbing.
“We’re riding with a completely different mentality than last season,” Fofonov told Wielerflits. “Racing for wins is the way we like best. You don’t want to miss out on victory when you start with three decent riders just to score with all three of them, do you?”
The Points Paradox: A System Under Scrutiny
Astana’s shift in strategy comes at a time when the UCI points system is facing increased scrutiny. The team’s recent success – Cristian Scaroni and Cristían Rodríguez finishing first and second overall at the Tour of Oman, and strong performances at the Asian Championships – highlights how quickly a team can amass points, even in smaller races. A single stage win in a Grand Tour can earn 1,100 points, but Astana nearly matched that in a single day.
This raises a key question: is the current system incentivizing teams to prioritize quantity over quality? Are teams being rewarded for competing in a wider range of events, potentially diluting the focus on the sport’s most prestigious races?
A New Three-Year Cycle, A New Approach
The current three-year cycle for WorldTour licenses is a significant factor in Astana’s decision. With a new cycle beginning, the pressure to accumulate points is lessened. “We’re now entering a new three-year cycle that will determine promotion and relegation,” Fofonov explained. “You can afford to lose points again, since a new cycle is starting anyway.”
This allows Astana to focus on developing riders capable of competing at the highest level, aiming for victories in major races like the Ardennes Classics. While riders like Christian Scaroni earned points in lower-tier events last year, the team hopes to see them contending for top-tier titles in 2026.
Currently, XDS-Astana sits second in the UCI rankings with 2,447.7 points, trailing only UAE Team Emirates-XRG. However, Fofonov is clear that points are no longer the primary objective.
The Broader Implications for Pro Cycling
Astana’s decision could signal a broader shift in strategy among WorldTour teams. If more teams prioritize wins over points, it could lead to a more competitive and exciting racing calendar, with a greater emphasis on performance in major events. It could also force the UCI to re-evaluate its points system, potentially introducing changes to better align incentives with the long-term health of the sport.
FAQ
Q: What is the UCI points system?
A: The UCI points system is used to rank teams and riders based on their performance in races, determining eligibility for WorldTour licenses and participation in major events.
Q: Why did XDS-Astana change its strategy?
A: XDS-Astana secured WorldTour status and is now prioritizing winning races over solely accumulating UCI points.
Q: What does this indicate for the future of pro cycling?
A: It could lead to a greater focus on performance in major races and potentially a re-evaluation of the UCI points system.
Did you know? A rider winning a monument race like the Tour of Flanders or Paris-Roubaix earns 800 UCI points – almost as much as Astana collected in a single day at the Tour of Oman and Asian Championships.
Pro Tip: Keep an eye on how other teams respond to Astana’s shift. Will they follow suit, or will they continue to prioritize points accumulation?
What are your thoughts on Astana’s new strategy? Share your opinions in the comments below!
Worth a look