A reader of the “Your Mileage May Vary” advice column voiced a common dilemma: after a decade in communications, they wonder whether their work makes a meaningful impact compared with friends who pursue high‑visibility careers in global health and policy.
Why the Pressure to Do Something “Grand” Exists
The column points to anthropologist Ernest Becker’s 1974 Pulitzer‑Prize‑winning book The Denial of Death, which argues that cultures create ways to manage the terror of mortality. Becker suggests that the drive to leave a lasting legacy is rooted in a fear of being forgotten.
This fear historically manifested through religion’s promise of an eternal soul. In the modern era, as religion’s grip waned, people have sought “symbolic immortality” through achievements such as publishing autobiographies, building nations, or championing large‑scale social progress—a narrative that aligns with utilitarian ideas of the greatest happiness for the greatest number.
Contrasting Paths: Grand Scale vs. Everyday Love
Saint Thérèse of Lisieux (1873‑1897) offers a counter‑example. She advocated a “Little Way,” focusing on deep, daily acts of love rather than broad, heroic deeds. Her modest “little flower” approach resonated widely, making her one of the most beloved saints despite her brief, cloistered life.
The column warns that extremes—pursuing only maximal impact or only intimate devotion—can lead to regret. Effective altruists may overlook personal wellbeing, while monastic devotion can ignore broader societal needs.
What This Means for Career Choices
The column advises a nuanced view: seek roles that align with personal values, allow for gratitude‑driven generosity, and maintain mental and physical sustainability. It acknowledges that comparing “good” across professions is inherently imprecise.
Ultimately, the recommendation is to aim for a career that blends substantive positive outcomes with a pluralistic enjoyment of life’s other riches. For some, this may mean staying put; for others, it could inspire a shift toward work that feels both impactful and personally fulfilling.
Potential Next Steps
Readers may begin reassessing their professional goals through the lens of value pluralism, perhaps exploring positions that combine scale and depth. Employers could respond by offering pathways that let employees engage in both broad‑impact projects and intimate, community‑focused initiatives. Public discourse might increasingly recognize diverse definitions of “good,” reducing the pressure to conform to a singular heroic ideal.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is value pluralism, as mentioned in the column?
Value pluralism is the idea that individuals hold multiple, equally valid values that can sometimes conflict, requiring careful negotiation rather than a single hierarchy.
Why does the column reference mortality when discussing career impact?
It cites Ernest Becker’s theory that fear of death drives people to seek lasting legacies, influencing modern aspirations for extraordinary careers.
What is Saint Thérèse’s “Little Way”?
Her “Little Way” emphasizes deep, everyday acts of love and humility over large‑scale achievements, encouraging contentment with modest, heartfelt contributions.
How do you balance the desire for impact with the need for personal well‑being?
Related reading