The Shifting Sands of Conflict: Key Trends from 2025’s Most Read Military & Geopolitical Analysis
As we close the book on 2025, a clear picture emerges from the year’s most-read analysis at War on the Rocks: the future of warfare and international relations isn’t about singular, dramatic shifts, but a complex interplay of established rivalries, rapidly evolving technology, and a renewed focus on historical lessons. The articles that resonated most with our readers point to several key trends that will likely dominate the geopolitical landscape for years to come.
The Proliferation & Pitfalls of Drone Technology
The intense interest in Jakub Jajcay’s piece, “I Fought in Ukraine and Here’s Why FPV Drones Kind of Suck,” highlights a crucial reality often glossed over in the hype surrounding drone warfare. While First-Person View (FPV) drones have undeniably changed the battlefield, offering low-cost reconnaissance and attack capabilities, their limitations – susceptibility to jamming, reliance on skilled pilots, and vulnerability to countermeasures – are becoming increasingly apparent.
Expect to see a move beyond simply more drones, towards smarter drones. This includes advancements in AI-powered autonomous systems, improved electronic warfare capabilities to counter jamming, and the development of drone swarms that can overwhelm defenses. The Ukrainian conflict serves as a real-world laboratory, accelerating this evolution.
The Return of Great Power Competition & Shifting Alliances
Articles focusing on Russia, China, and North Korea – including analyses of Trump’s national security strategy, the Russia-North Korea partnership, and China’s ambitions in the South China Sea – consistently drew high readership. This underscores the growing concern over great power competition and the reshaping of global alliances.
Rick Landgraf’s analysis of a potential second Trump administration’s national security strategy suggests a possible move towards more transactional relationships and a questioning of long-held alliances. This uncertainty is forcing nations to reassess their strategic partnerships and explore alternative security arrangements. The strengthening ties between Russia and North Korea, as highlighted by Choong-Koo Lee, is a prime example of this realignment.
Historical Echoes in Modern Conflict
The surprising popularity of articles examining historical battles – Cannae, Lake Champlain, Antietam, Leuthen, and the Yalu – reveals a deep-seated desire to understand the present through the lens of the past. Bret Devereaux’s piece on Cannae, for instance, isn’t just an academic exercise; it’s a reminder of the enduring principles of encirclement and annihilation, relevant to modern battlefield tactics.
Military strategists are increasingly turning to historical case studies to identify patterns, anticipate enemy behavior, and develop effective countermeasures. This trend suggests a rejection of purely technological solutions and a renewed appreciation for the human element in warfare.
The Future of Marine Corps Modernization & Force Structure
The focus on the Marine Corps, with articles like Ben Connable’s “We Need a Marine Corps, Part I: A Corps in Crisis” and Brandan Schofield & Andrew Edwards’ analysis of the III MEF’s mobility mandate, indicates a critical debate about the role and structure of this vital force. The Marine Corps is grappling with the challenge of adapting to a changing threat landscape, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region.
Expect to see continued experimentation with new technologies, such as unmanned systems and long-range precision fires, as the Marine Corps seeks to maintain its relevance in a contested maritime environment. The emphasis on mobility and distributed operations reflects a recognition of the need to operate in a dispersed and rapidly changing battlespace.
Submarine Warfare & Naval Power
Peter Briggs’ stark warning about Australia’s submarine program – “When It Comes to Submarines, Australia Is Going to Be Left High and Dry” – resonated deeply, highlighting the strategic vulnerabilities created by delays and setbacks in defense procurement. Liborio Palombella’s analysis of the Falklands War further underscores the critical importance of submarine warfare in modern naval operations.
The AUKUS security pact, while intended to address Australia’s submarine needs, faces significant challenges. The global demand for submarines is increasing, and the capacity to build and maintain these complex vessels is limited. This will likely lead to increased competition for submarine technology and expertise.
Wargaming & Strategic Foresight
The inclusion of a wargame scenario – “A Wargame to Take Taiwan, from China’s Perspective” – demonstrates the growing importance of strategic foresight and scenario planning. Wargames allow policymakers and military leaders to explore potential courses of action, identify vulnerabilities, and develop contingency plans.
Expect to see more sophisticated wargaming exercises, incorporating AI and machine learning to simulate complex scenarios and generate insights. These exercises will be crucial for preparing for potential conflicts and mitigating risks.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is drone warfare becoming less effective? Not necessarily, but its effectiveness is being challenged by countermeasures and limitations in technology.
- What is the biggest threat to global stability? Great power competition, particularly between the US, China, and Russia, is currently the most significant threat.
- Why is studying military history still relevant? Historical analysis provides valuable insights into enduring principles of warfare and can help anticipate future challenges.
- What is the future of the Marine Corps? The Marine Corps is adapting to a changing threat landscape by embracing new technologies and focusing on mobility and distributed operations.
Want to delve deeper into these critical issues? Explore more analysis at War on the Rocks and join the conversation. Become a member to support independent, in-depth reporting on national security and foreign policy.
