Safdarjung Hospital in New Delhi has formally disputed allegations made by Gitanjali Angmo, wife of activist Sonam Wangchuk, regarding the transparency of her husband’s medical care. According to a statement reported by ANI, the hospital maintains that it provided a patient summary report on Saturday that explicitly included Wangchuk’s potassium levels. This conflict follows Angmo’s petition to the Delhi High Court seeking to transfer the 59-year-old activist to a private medical facility.
Dispute Over Medical Transparency and Data Reporting
The core of the disagreement centers on the accuracy and disclosure of medical data. Gitanjali Angmo alleged in a social media post that the hospital failed to provide written records of her husband’s potassium levels or include them in formal health bulletins. In response, Safdarjung Hospital stated that the summary report shared with the family on Saturday clearly documented these values.
Further complicating the matter, Angmo claimed a discrepancy between the hospital’s reported potassium level of 2.9 mEq/l and an independent laboratory result of 3.6 mEq/l. Safdarjung Hospital officials emphasized that their multidisciplinary team of experts has been consistently counseling the family to ensure adherence to treatment protocols. The hospital characterized these public allegations as detrimental to the “smooth management” of the patient’s clinical care.
Clinical Status and Treatment Refusal
Sonam Wangchuk was admitted to the Vardhman Mahavir Medical College (VMMC) and Safdarjung Hospital on July 18 after being brought in by the Delhi Police. Medical records cited by the hospital indicate that the patient had been fasting from solid food for 20 days prior to admission, resulting in generalized weakness.
Initial assessments by the hospital staff showed the patient suffering from compensated acidosis and low serum potassium. While the medical team recommended intravenous fluids, oral rehydration, and medication to stabilize these conditions, the hospital reports that Wangchuk has refused all medical interventions. The medical team continues to monitor his vitals and provide ongoing counseling.
Did you know?
Medical ethics guidelines often emphasize the “right to refuse treatment” for competent patients. However, when a patient is under observation in a public facility, hospitals must balance this autonomy with their duty of care, leading to complex legal scenarios when family members request transfers due to perceived lack of transparency.
Security Measures and Legal Claims of Detention
Beyond the medical data, the dispute encompasses concerns regarding hospital environment and movement. Gitanjali Angmo has alleged in her court petition that heavy police presence within the hospital premises has restricted the family’s ability to move freely and visit the patient. She has described the ongoing situation as “illegal detention.”
The hospital has not directly addressed the police deployment in its public statement, focusing instead on the clinical management of the patient. The matter remains before the Delhi High Court, where the primary issue is whether the court will grant permission for the transfer to a private hospital of the family’s choosing, a request Angmo justifies by stating she has “lost faith” in the care provided by the current institution.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a family member transfer a patient against medical advice?
Generally, patients have the right to discharge themselves against medical advice (DAMA). However, if a patient is in police custody or under specific legal orders, transfer requests often require judicial intervention, as seen in this case.
What is the significance of potassium levels in fasting patients?
Low serum potassium (hypokalemia), as reported in this case, can lead to muscle weakness, fatigue, and serious cardiac arrhythmias. Monitoring these levels is a standard protocol for patients undergoing prolonged fasting.
How do hospitals handle disputes with patient families?
Hospitals typically utilize multidisciplinary teams—including doctors, counselors, and social workers—to mediate communication. When disputes escalate to public allegations, institutions often issue formal summaries to clarify the clinical facts and defend their established treatment protocols.
Are you following the developments in this case? Share your perspective on hospital-family communication and patient rights in the comments section below.
Related reading